You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

UKOPS - The Thread

145679

Comments

  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    Hi, Can anyone please tell me. I have recently qualified for the UKOPS Main event but was wanting to try another satelitte to qualify for the High Roller event. What happens if I qualify for the Main event again? Thanks
    Posted by jackAherts
    I don't believe the "mixed" SuperSats (High Roller & Main Event) are running any more, though I could be wrong on that There WILL, I'm quite sure, be High Roller Sats though.
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread : I don't believe the "mixed" SuperSats (High Roller & Main Event) are running any more, though I could be wrong on that There WILL, I'm quite sure, be High Roller Sats though.
    Posted by Tikay10
    Okay cheers Tikay, I will have a look through the lobby
  • edited November 2011

    After looking forward to UKOPS since it was announced, and trying to satellite into all the events (with some success) that i was able to play, and buying in the events i did not satellite into,   i recently found out i am unable to play tonights event and saturdays event due to covering for someone at work.

    I emailed Sky and they did change the saturdays £110 event so i can play in wednesdays  £110 event, and i was very greatful.

    I then unregistered for the omaha event UKOPS2,  thinking this was one i'd bought in direct, it wasn't however, and my account was not refunded, fair enough.
    I emailed my PRIORITY contact and was told that they could not refund my £55 , and could not change this to another event.
    I then asked if i could be re-entered into the event, with the £55 buy -in i'd earned and they would not even re-enter me. 
    So i'm now £55 out of pocket, and have to go to work, now i can't wait for UKOPS to be over, and i will never ever be satting into an event again, as sky seem reluctant to help me out when work or other things may prevent me from playing.

    Must run better

  • edited November 2011
    Ding Ding

    Round 2
  • edited November 2011
    seems like theres going to be a big overaly in UKOPS2
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    seems like theres going to be a big overaly in UKOPS2
    Posted by big_mick12
    not really.  needs 200 to hit the gtd.  got 140 runners.  only needs 60 rebuys/addons to break even.  should make it comfortably
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    seems like theres going to be a big overaly in UKOPS2
    Posted by big_mick12
    Doubt it, after the re-buys and add-ons!

  • edited November 2011

    Thanx for all of the support guys, much appreciated

    Really enjoyed taking that one down, as you can imagine

    Roll on the rest of the Series
  • edited November 2011
    nah its been smashed my maths was very poor lol 
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    UKOPS1 huge success in terms of entrants, and the few quid Sky overlaid in the initial satellites was certainly repaid, and then some. Such a shame that Sky didn't seize the bull by the horns and commit properly to this event by putting it on TV live. First rule of marketing - never go at anything half-heartedly.
    Posted by Eyeman
    Astounding.

    A live show every night really would add nothing.  If anything it would saturate the series meaning by the time we get to the main everyone would be sick to the back teeth of it.  SkyPoker's unique selling point is the TV and now the community but they don't want to overly focus purely on the TV channel.  It's starting to become a major player in the UK based market and the UKOPS is a further attempt to push on further, rather than being 'that site with the TV channel.'  There is no business case to have a nightly live show.  There could also be pre records for some of the non-live events.

    Half-heartedly?  Have you seen the amount of overlay they threw at this series in the from of satellites to get some buzz going.  They were burning money the first week to kick start it.  We got a ton of extra value, there was a ton of advertising online and on the channel and you see this as half hearted?  Seriously, the big picture must be a dot to you.  (N.B.  That last line was stolen from Friends)
  • edited November 2011
    I just managed to hang onto getting into the 10k omaha for 2 quid something, in a satellite with lots of extra value.

    Delighted when I squeezed into the money.

    Even more delighted when made final table, without rebuys or top-ups, as out of my financial league. Till now, anyway.

    I'm a noob at Omaha, love it though I do.

    The biggest win of my life, and I am now a winning poker player at sky poker, by a couple of grand give ot take a bit, I should think.

    So happy! So drained!

    David aka 10BITE aka Tenbyite
  • edited November 2011
    Congratulations to David and to all who cashed in Event 2.

    Tuesday 1st November 2011

    UKOPS Event 2 £10,000 Gtd PLO

    https://www.skypoker.com/secure/poker/sky_lobby?action=go_tnmt_lobby&game_id=5195669&guid=b92adc87-1d32-4195-b316-6f194b8c9cbe
    HeadsValue
     
     
          
    10bite1411240001£3388.50 + 80 League Points
    yougotme2402£1970.35 + 76 League Points
    DiggerMan03£1380.50 + 72 League Points
    candyking704£1129.50 + 68 League Points
    shanks24605£916.15 + 64 League Points
    UNCLE_PAT06£753 + 60 League Points
    LOL_RAISE07£627.50 + 56 League Points
    TimmyRaRa08£502 + 52 League Points
    JE8509£376.50 + 48 League Points
    SoLack010£251 + 44 League Points
    IANFRAZER011£125.50 + 40 League Points
    CHRIS0904012£125.50 + 36 League Points
    dantb10013£125.50 + 32 League Points
    bh0ywndr014£125.50 + 28 League Points
    Direwolf015£125.50 + 24 League Points
    curlarge016£125.50 + 20 League Points
    delaney09017£125.50 + 20 League Points
    lacl018£125.50 + 20 League Points
    GW279019£125.50 + 20 League Points
    Batkin88020£125.50 + 20 League Points
    peg1021
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    I just managed to hang onto getting into the 10k omaha for 2 quid something, in a satellite with lots of extra value. Delighted when I squeezed into the money. Even more delighted when made final table, without rebuys or top-ups, as out of my financial league. Till now, anyway. I'm a noob at Omaha, love it though I do. The biggest win of my life, and I am now a winning poker player at sky poker, by a couple of grand give ot take a bit, I should think. So happy! So drained! David aka 10BITE aka Tenbyite
    Posted by 10bite14
    Chuffed to bits for you, David, & enjoyed sharing a Table with you.

    Bet you feel even more proud this morning, basking in the glow. And so you should.

    Congrats Sir, many congrats.

    UKOPS1 & UKOPS2 have both gone to "regular guys". What's not to like?
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    I just managed to hang onto getting into the 10k omaha for 2 quid something, in a satellite with lots of extra value. Delighted when I squeezed into the money. Even more delighted when made final table, without rebuys or top-ups, as out of my financial league. Till now, anyway. I'm a noob at Omaha, love it though I do. The biggest win of my life, and I am now a winning poker player at sky poker, by a couple of grand give ot take a bit, I should think. So happy! So drained! David aka 10BITE aka Tenbyite
    Posted by 10bite14

    Congratulations sir and well played!
  • edited November 2011
    wp 10bite14...great to hear stories like that,
    onwards & up!
  • edited November 2011
    WD 10bite14

    A quick one for Sky.  The UKOPS3 Semi is listed as PL rather than NL in the lobby
  • edited November 2011
    Back to UKOPS for me tonight. Cashed in Monday's, couldn't play last night as I had a pool game (Played like an absolute demon I must add, played 3 games and 8balled my opponent twice) Now for a long old haul in the doublestack.
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    I just managed to hang onto getting into the 10k omaha for 2 quid something, in a satellite with lots of extra value. Delighted when I squeezed into the money. Even more delighted when made final table, without rebuys or top-ups, as out of my financial league. Till now, anyway. I'm a noob at Omaha, love it though I do. The biggest win of my life, and I am now a winning poker player at sky poker, by a couple of grand give ot take a bit, I should think. So happy! So drained! David aka 10BITE aka Tenbyite
    Posted by 10bite14
    Great result sir!

    U put my chippies to good use!
  • edited November 2011
    Firstly, before i stick my head on the chopping block i'm gunna say that Tikay, you sir are amazing. Love the stuff you do on 865 and for SkyPoker in general and fingers crossed i get to meet you one day.

    About the UKOPS coverage/commitment/expenditure etc.
    Whilst i think it's hard for anyone to disagree that it costs a bunch of money to air a live show, the rake taken from the UKOPS tourneys themselves would more than cover it surely? I work it out to be about £4400 worth of rake taken in just the bounty hunter tournaments alone, so even if it was some sort of internet only stream from your living room where you discuss what's going on :P (obviously i'm in jest here but i think the point still has some merit). With such a loyal fanbase that SkyPoker has, and the community that's been built up around it, to hype up the UKOPS and then show all these satellites on TV, but not the actual events themselves seems... not unfair, just a little unbalanced.
    I'm also gunna chip in and say whilst i'm not questioning the behind the scenes of SkyPoker at all, i'm sceptical that such a big emphasis can be put on the work ethic of those that produced UKOPS. There were no bracelets given out, the tournies were pretty similar to weekly ones on Sky despite a few little changes in starting stacks and blind levels, along with no form of coverage of the events themselves or an opportunity for people to switch tickets between events.
    I LOVE SkyPoker, and i'm only saying all this because i truly believe that this UKOPS thing has legs. It's just at the moment they are prosthetic, and squeeking a little bit :P

    TommyD - For someone to say that too much coverage over a 1 week period of 7/8 events is absolute crazy imo. All you have to do is look at PokerStars to see that coverage = WIN. The WCOOP and SCOOP had over 50 events each and they each had their own live-streams, radio shows etc and it was a MASSIVE success. Too much coverage /> too little, and i'm sure most of the people on Sky would say one of the best things about playing on the site is to see themselves on TV!

    Cliffs:
    1) TK, i love you, and Sky Poker.
    2) UKOPS has the potential to be HUGE, instead of a something that people are gunna forget about in a week or two.
    3) Coverage = GOOD. If you think you'd get worn out from only 7/8 events worth of coverage, i doubt you're a poker fan at heart. Bigger the better baby!

    Much love to y'all and run good out there people.
    Cheers,
    Carlos Smitalos
    P.S. This is NOT supposed to be a "this is wrong, that is wrong, fix it". I'm just pointing stuff out that people can agree/disagree with. It's all just my opinion and if people wanna come on here and tell me i'm wrong that's cool! :)
  • edited November 2011
    so 4.4k in rake is supposed to cover presenter/analysts/guest/2 cameramen/runner/sound guy/graphics guy/director/producer/makeup and probably 1-2 other people who I've forgotten for about 8 hours to do the live show

    not taking into account the massive overlay that sky got done for in the first week of sats

    plus they get taxed on all rake

    plus all the expenses of all the UKOPS stuff like the site graphics/leaflets at SPT/producing promo videos.
  • edited November 2011
    Congratulations to Diamond81 and all who cashed in event 3. I'm impressed to see the prizepool in this one more than doubling the guarantee.

    Wednesday 2nd November 2011

    UKOPS Event 3 - £10,000 Gtd. Double Stack

    https://www.skypoker.com/secure/poker/sky_lobby?action=go_tnmt_lobby&game_id=5195684&guid=f23b074c-1703-4cf4-8b4f-aa8b38538380
    HeadsValue
     
     
          
    diamond8116800001£5670 + 80 League Points
    Dave48802£3255 + 76 League Points
    18AND5TIME03£2205 + 72 League Points
    railtard1104£1680 + 68 League Points
    AB015105£1470 + 64 League Points
    winner560306£1260 + 60 League Points
    mondonewc07£840 + 56 League Points
    troyg08£630 + 52 League Points
    elsadog09£420 + 48 League Points
    goodylad21010£210 + 44 League Points
    M4VERICK011£178.50 + 40 League Points
    Mariusz80012£178.50 + 36 League Points
    albaking013£178.50 + 32 League Points
    aiken2001014£178.50 + 28 League Points
    candyking7015£178.50 + 24 League Points
    Tommo07016£178.50 + 20 League Points
    DrewMcRobb017£178.50 + 20 League Points
    sara36dd08018£178.50 + 20 League Points
    WATTIE68019£178.50 + 20 League Points
    heellloooo020£178.50 + 20 League Points
    ACOZUBI021£157.50 + 16 League Points
    gerrard99022£157.50 + 16 League Points
    macapaca023£157.50 + 16 League Points
    goldenb238024£157.50 + 16 League Points
    iblamecoco025£157.50 + 16 League Points
    pumpkin23026£157.50 + 16 League Points
    Boonicon027£157.50 + 16 League Points
    made4game028£157.50 + 16 League Points
    JAEGERBOMB029£157.50 + 16 League Points
    THETANK030
  • edited November 2011
    "so 4.4k in rake is supposed to cover presenter/analysts/guest/2 cameramen/runner/sound guy/graphics guy/director/producer/makeup and probably 1-2 other people who I've forgotten for about 8 hours to do the live show
    not taking into account the massive overlay that sky got done for in the first week of sats
    plus they get taxed on all rake
    plus all the expenses of all the UKOPS stuff like the site graphics/leaflets at SPT/producing promo videos."

    scotty get your tongue out of skypokers ar se!! :).... surely he has his own opinion... its all about improving things... the first ukops isnt/wasnt going to be perfect... they will deffo improve the next time around which is great...
    why cant people on this forum give some input without being shot down??? i dont think its fair..
    surely everyone has a right to there own opinion.. and its not like hes talking absolute rubbish is it...
    its not impossible for sky to air more of the ukops next time around...
    surely increasing the traffic of the site long term will increase revenue long term... so i think airing all the ukops would potentially increase future profits over the following... gotta spend money to make money havent you??
    i dont disagree with the fact they spend alot of money etc etc... as sky are very good imo...
    i also think it would of been nice to air all of the series as its not a regular occurance is it?

    its a bit like hosting the world cup... we are only gonna show the semi final and the final.... just doesnt seem to be logical...
    at the end of the day... sky is a business and its up to them what they want and wish to do...

    but also keeping the majority happy is also good as they want feedback..
    gl to all... 
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    so 4.4k in rake is supposed to cover presenter/analysts/guest/2 cameramen/runner/sound guy/graphics guy/director/producer/makeup and probably 1-2 other people who I've forgotten for about 8 hours to do the live show not taking into account the massive overlay that sky got done for in the first week of sats plus they get taxed on all rake plus all the expenses of all the UKOPS stuff like the site graphics/leaflets at SPT/producing promo videos.
    Posted by scotty77
    I wasn't saying the rake should cover it, obviously the money taken in rake and the budget for TV shows are two completely different things. But if the best you can come up with is "but rake isn't going to cover the cost, is it" then i'd like to think i had a point there. As i said previously, it doesn't even need to be something well polished or immaculate. Just some form of coverage to make the UKOPS something people will remember! I doubt many Sky players who know won any of the first 3 events unless they come to this particular thread. Most people play poker for fun and the main attraction of Sky is the TV element, or even if it's just their names being mentioned.
    Heck, I'd vlog about the UKOPS series for free for gods sake! It can't be that hard to string some form of display together to give the series a little more prestiege.
    Cheers,
    Carlos Smitalos
    P.s. Thanks to IMAROCK for covering my back, much appreciated man. It doesn't take someone to agree with you to have to stick up for ya, thanks again dude. Even if people don't agree with what i've said in my posts that's absolutely fine with me! :) I'm just trying to make the next UKOPS and SkyPoker in general better for everyone, and i wouldn't be spending my time on these long posts if i was just "hating".
  • edited November 2011
    I agree, Smitalos. I posted similarly, though nowhere near as eloquently, and YoungGun started a similar thread in GPC. I used the term half-heartedly (which was, in hindsight an error) and that got picked upon more than my points, which were as yours.
    Apparently 100 meeting went into the making of UKOPS - I'm guessing a few fewer meetings, and the air-time would have been more than covered, and the world would have more little packets of biscuits than now (tongue in cheek, btw).
    To see TommyD suggest that Sky needs to move away from their TV roots and that no-one cares about the channel is nonsense.
    Maybe Apple might want to discontinue their iPod and iPhone series - we're all bored of them now. When you have a unique selling point, don't rejoin the crowd.
    I'll mention again that when the open (and velocity) was shown nightly, the tournament was maxed out at 600 EVERY NIGHT. It's clear that Sky can't afford such frippery, but 7 days of TV to go with the UKOPS events seems like a great idea to me.
    I'm made up that the series has been a success, and hope it is repeated (at least annually if not 6-monthly or more). Due to work commitments etc, I am unlikely to play an more of this series' events, but can't remember being so excited to see my table open for these tournaments since my early days of online poker.
  • edited November 2011
    In Response to To Tikay + TommyD:
    Firstly, before i stick my head on the chopping block i'm gunna say that Tikay, you sir are amazing. Love the stuff you do on 865 and for SkyPoker in general and fingers crossed i get to meet you one day. About the UKOPS coverage/commitment/expenditure etc. Whilst i think it's hard for anyone to disagree that it costs a bunch of money to air a live show, the rake taken from the UKOPS tourneys themselves would more than cover it surely? I work it out to be about £4400 worth of rake taken in just the bounty hunter tournaments alone, so even if it was some sort of internet only stream from your living room where you discuss what's going on :P (obviously i'm in jest here but i think the point still has some merit). With such a loyal fanbase that SkyPoker has, and the community that's been built up around it, to hype up the UKOPS and then show all these satellites on TV, but not the actual events themselves seems... not unfair, just a little unbalanced. I'm also gunna chip in and say whilst i'm not questioning the behind the scenes of SkyPoker at all, i'm sceptical that such a big emphasis can be put on the work ethic of those that produced UKOPS. There were no bracelets given out, the tournies were pretty similar to weekly ones on Sky despite a few little changes in starting stacks and blind levels, along with no form of coverage of the events themselves or an opportunity for people to switch tickets between events. I LOVE SkyPoker, and i'm only saying all this because i truly believe that this UKOPS thing has legs. It's just at the moment they are prosthetic, and squeeking a little bit :P TommyD - For someone to say that too much coverage over a 1 week period of 7/8 events is absolute crazy imo. All you have to do is look at PokerStars to see that coverage = WIN. The WCOOP and SCOOP had over 50 events each and they each had their own live-streams, radio shows etc and it was a MASSIVE success. Too much coverage /> too little, and i'm sure most of the people on Sky would say one of the best things about playing on the site is to see themselves on TV! Cliffs: 1) TK, i love you, and Sky Poker. 2) UKOPS has the potential to be HUGE, instead of a something that people are gunna forget about in a week or two. 3) Coverage = GOOD. If you think you'd get worn out from only 7/8 events worth of coverage, i doubt you're a poker fan at heart. Bigger the better baby! Much love to y'all and run good out there people. Cheers, Carlos Smitalos P.S. This is NOT supposed to be a "this is wrong, that is wrong, fix it". I'm just pointing stuff out that people can agree/disagree with. It's all just my opinion and if people wanna come on here and tell me i'm wrong that's cool! :)
    Posted by Smitalos
    Hey Smitalos

    I appreciate your opinion.  I would say though that in my opinion you can't compare UKOPS with WCOOP or SCOOP.  Stars has a vastly deeper player pool and I would think those webcasts didn't cost that much compared to 4 hours of live TV in the UK.  It helps that they generate as much money as they do.  Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't these webcasts a recent inclusion for the last SCOOP and WCOOPS?  The Stars juggernaut had already been rolling long before they added these, Sky and UKOPS are at a much different stage of development.

  • edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - The Thread:
    I agree, Smitalos. I posted similarly, though nowhere near as eloquently, and YoungGun started a similar thread in GPC. I used the term half-heartedly (which was, in hindsight an error) and that got picked upon more than my points, which were as yours. Apparently 100 meeting went into the making of UKOPS - I'm guessing a few fewer meetings, and the air-time would have been more than covered, and the world would have more little packets of biscuits than now (tongue in cheek, btw). To see TommyD suggest that Sky needs to move away from their TV roots and that no-one cares about the channel is nonsense. Maybe Apple might want to discontinue their iPod and iPhone series - we're all bored of them now. When you have a unique selling point, don't rejoin the crowd. I'll mention again that when the open (and velocity) was shown nightly, the tournament was maxed out at 600 EVERY NIGHT. It's clear that Sky can't afford such frippery, but 7 days of TV to go with the UKOPS events seems like a great idea to me. I'm made up that the series has been a success, and hope it is repeated (at least annually if not 6-monthly or more). Due to work commitments etc, I am unlikely to play an more of this series' events, but can't remember being so excited to see my table open for these tournaments since my early days of online poker.
    Posted by Eyeman

    I said nothing of the sort.  What I stated was that Sky is attempting to become more than just 'that site with the TV Channel.'  I cannot fathom how you have taken what I have posted as advocating discontinuing the channel, I view 865 as a core element of SkyPoker, just that it shouldn't be the be all and end all.

  • edited November 2011
    Of course every one has opinion on this, but comments about taking tongues out of places aren't really needed so please don't resort to it. Every one has their opinion and we should be able to respect all sides of the debate.

    As for the UKOPS series and TV issue, Tikay mentioned earlier on much of the thinking from a Sky Poker business perspective. Now, please don't mistake me for being one of those who is privy to all of the information re: financials, etc. Frankly I don't need to be - I am here for the poker content and the Community. However, the premise is a fairly simple one.

    To put on one live TV show costs a substantial amount of money. We're not talking low thousands, either. There are the costs of crew, presenters, make-up, wardrobe (although Tikay's burgundy jumper came from there, along with a travesty of a shirt I wore a few years back now), technical support, studio overheads, design costs and so on. It is MUCH more than many people would guess. If Sky as a business open the live shows for another 4 live shows, you're looking at a big chunk of change. While there would definitely be extra rake from tournaments and incremental bits and pieces (some UKOPS players might want to play a couple of sit and gos at the same time, for example), it's nowhere near to covering the amount spent on UKOPS as a whole. 

    That leaves us with a basic question: where should that extra money come from? Marketing? Then we have less players come to - or continue to play on- the site, so less people playing the tournaments and therefore can only offer smaller guarantees. Take it from the guarantee prize pools? Then less people play, you lose the prestige, etc. There's a balance to be struck and I personally believe the whole Sky Poker team have made a collective effort to tick as many of the boxes as possible, both for the players and for Sky's continued growth as a poker room. £140,000 in guarantees in one week is pretty ambitious, I think most of us would agree.

    There have been some nice suggestions around this, such as a vblog, and those are things we will certainly take away from the comments on this thread. The one thing I'd like to impress though is that Sky really HAVE tried to get behind this as much as possible and we're very pleased with how that's gone. Risks are sometimes taken in business from time to time, but in this instance I think a solid platform for future UKOPS and the like had to be the best course of action. Nothing is every perfect the first time around and we'll make the tweaks we can for the next set of UKOPS, I am sure.

    My advice on issues such as this is to have a listen to what Tikay says. Yes he's 'pro-Sky' but he does talk very honestly about some things you'd frankly never get an insight on from some of the 'bigger' sites. He's a huge resource for you guys so do take on board what he says. :)

    Again, the above is all my personal opinion. I don't have huge insight in to highest level decision-making, but from what I can see there's a lot of common sense around this whole issue which can be applied. Sure I'd love to see the shows on all week based around the UKOPS events - I am sure we all would - but decisions have to be made and I for one think Sky are on the money this time.

    Oh, and I will stop kissing backside now. I have to do certain amounts of it per week though for two reasons: 1) they pay me 2) I love this site, the Community and where it's headed. It's an exciting time on Sky Poker - why not get behind it?
  • edited November 2011
    wpwp diamond81
  • edited November 2011
    Eyeman - Yeah i saw your earlier post about 'half-hearted' and to some degree i do agree with you to be honest. SkyDave has said the GTD's for the tournaments were ambitious, but i thought they could've done better (a grade of C+ if you will! haha!). The fact that the GTD's were smashed shows how 1) This UKOPS thing could really be a big success, 2) How many people flock to these prestiegious 'TV' events with big prizepools. With regards to how often they do this, i could even see them getting away with every 3 months (like the FTOPS did on FullTilt), and you're right, it's the biggest and arguably best thing to happen to SkyPoker in quite some time man! Thanks for your reply and the way you went about it, let's keep sharing the poker love!

    TommyD - Thanks for taking the time to respond with such humility sir! Brought a smile to my face just reading your thought out response, so thank you! :) Whilst i agree that Sky is going to be a little rusty with its first UKOPS, i think it's important to get the ball rolling as quickly as possible. Admittedly, they are never going to be able to put on such coverage like Stars do, but i was just trying to prove a point in the way that people who love poker, will love poker media! Updates, news, promotions etc. Whether it's a notification that the final-table of an event is underway, or giving the winners a call next time a show on 865 is broadcast, just anything to give people that feeling of, "That could be me!! :O..... :D".
    I was chatting to a poker-mate of mine from Canada the other week and explained how i've moved to Sky. (He hadn't even heard of the site to be honest!). But when i mentioned the 'you can be on TV' thing, his ears perked up and said it was "sick" in a good way! :P
    Yes, Sky doesn't want to be a one trick pony with the TV thing, but my oh my is it one hell of a trick to get people onboard and loyal to the site in the first place.

    SkyDave - All i can really say is thank you for coming to the thread, and that i'm glad some of the stuff is being taken onboard. :)
    I apologise dearly for the ramblyness of my reply, i've been up for about 20hrs and am knackered!
    Keep up the good discussion guys.
    Cheers,
    Carlos Smitalos
  • edited November 2011
    My observation so far is that UKOPS has gone fantastically well for SKY and tonight's guarantee for a £500+ buy-in has already been achieved.

    Bounty hunters continue to be very popular on this site and adding to Scotty77's suggestion I think the £100 buy in should be something to try and include in the tornament schedule on a regular basis.

    Also, if the UKOPS event is repeated it may be worth adding an small extra buy-in of 50p to the main tourament each night so that the winner gets the normal cash winnings plus a seat to the main event. Dependant upon entrants this may even stretch to 2nd or 3rd place receiving seats to the main event - just a thought.

    Very well done so far - can't wait for tonight's show!
Sign In or Register to comment.