Why cant all the sats be the same structure as the super sats???

K8LOU

I dont understand the reason why sky cant slow the structure down to the structure of the super sats ??? The sats on this site are absolute bingo and I beleive this puts alot of players off because they loose there edge !!! Would it not be possible to put on 2 different formats ?? turbo sats and slower sats ?????

Slipwater

I must admit, I do dislike the satellites - I never do well in them. Ever! I end up buying straight into whichever event I want to play.

goldnballz

Agreed, these super sats are soooo much better than the 3 min bingo ones, & looks like they're proving very popular

GaryQQQ

There's been several threads about in the past.

As I've stated before I almost never enter sats because of the bingo structure. In my opinion skill edges are blunted to the extent that it's almost impossible to beat the rake (which gets taken from both your entry fee and your prize).

Sats are a great earner for the site; each seat filled by a satellite qualifier earns at least twice as much rake as a direct buy-in. I've nothing against players with a small roll using sats to take a shot if they so choose, but if you can afford a direct buy-in that's the more sensible option imo.

The_Don90

I havent played in a while but if you're complaining about turbo sats then i 100% disagree. 

I also 100% disagree with GaryQQQ. 

There is a huge skill edge in turbo sats, even as quick as 1 min levels. The 3 min levels i completely crush. 

If you can't beat em then adapt. Its a skill game. 

Also if they have more turbos, more can play and fill throughout the day. More rake and the morwe we can play to balance the variance.