You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Sat call or fold?

edited January 2014 in The Poker Clinic

This could be an easy call, an easy fold, or close. I've no idea, useless at sats.

6pm sat into the main last night, 36 left from 150, 30 prizes.

I'm 33rd/34th.

Opponent had previously shown he knows what he's doing, taking shoving spots with weak holdings on 2 occasions, 1 I remember was a button shove with 45s with a stack just about big enough to have fold equity still.


1,119 to call.

Would leave me 1.9k with 600 in blind next hand....
1bigdaddy Small blind  600.00 600.00 12222.00
DOHHHHHHH Big blind  1200.00 1800.00 3050.00
  Your hole cards
  • 6
  • 7
     
REDARROW61 All-in  2319.00 4119.00 0.00
unbpower Fold     
Dideusboo Fold     
JONONZIE Fold     
1bigdaddy Fold     
DOHHHHHHH 

Comments

  • edited January 2014
    Do we know what the average stack is? I'm leaning heavily towards a fold here - I know we've already chucked in 1,200 chips, and it's only another 1,100, but I really can't see us beating very much with 67 off.
  • edited January 2014

    It'll be 150 x 2,000 / 36 = 8.3kish avg.......?
  • edited January 2014
    I'm calling. Folding here is just so meh when you're getting 3/1, we shouldn't care too much about holdings when facing such odds. I don't think you should ever let your M get this low, even in a sat. Still 6 players to go before a prize so you need chips from somewhere, getting it in here one of those where you just have to sigh and call.
  • edited January 2014
    No chance we can fold to a seat so think I'd call and go for it. 


  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    Do we know what the average stack is? I'm leaning heavily towards a fold here - I know we've already chucked in 1,200 chips, and it's only another 1,100, but I really can't see us beating very much with 67 off.
    Posted by Slipwater
    Calling here is obv +EV, so why pass that up. It does not matter that we are behind, we only need 25% equity to break even, thats almost the equity needed to crack any over pair.
  • edited January 2014
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : Calling here is obv +EV, so why pass that up. It does not matter that we are behind, we only need 25% equity to break even, thats almost the equity needed to crack any over pair.
    Posted by mugsy78
    That may well be, mugsy, but in the fifteen seconds we get to make our decision, I think we fold more often than we call. Equity percentages just do not (accurately) enter our thought processes in this limited space of time.
  • edited January 2014

    It being a sat makes no difference then?

    Ofc I click 'call any' as soon as he shoves in a normal mtt. Thought the sat survival thing might change it.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    It being a sat makes no difference then? Ofc I click 'call any' as soon as he shoves in a normal mtt. Thought the sat survival thing might change it.
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    It does... But we need 6 people to bust still.

    All things considered it's a call imo.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    It being a sat makes no difference then? Ofc I click 'call any' as soon as he shoves in a normal mtt. Thought the sat survival thing might change it.
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    Theres just too many players to go before the prize. Obviously you can let your M get a little lower in sats but letting it get to 2 is just too low, even for a sat.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : That may well be, mugsy, but in the fifteen seconds we get to make our decision, I think we fold more often than we call. Equity percentages just do not (accurately) enter our thought processes in this limited space of time.
    Posted by Slipwater
    Not sure if you're trying to level me here. We should already know what pot odds we are facing even before the action gets to us. Its not really hard to work out what 1000/4000 is to get an approx of equity. I see Rancid gets a more accurate answer but honestly this should come auto to you. We don't really need a pin point calc to give us a rough idea..

    Also what do you think about when facing all ins if you're not thinking abour equity, pot odds etc?
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : Not sure if you're trying to level me here. We should already know what pot odds we are facing even before the action gets to us. Its not really hard to work out what 1000/4000 is to get an approx of equity. I see Rancid gets a more accurate answer but honestly this should come auto to you. We don't really need a pin point calc to give us a rough idea.. Also what do you think about when facing all ins if you're not thinking abour equity, pot odds etc?
    Posted by mugsy78
    Usually what flavour of Pot Noodle to have for tea.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : Usually what flavour of Pot Noodle to have for tea.
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    Heh made me lol
  • edited January 2014
    I just don't think I'm calling off another 1,100 chips with a hand that (statistically) is likely to be worse than the villain's. I guess we're ahead of 4 5.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    I just don't think I'm calling off another 1,100 chips with a hand that (statistically) is likely to be worse than the villain's. I guess we're ahead of 4 5.
    Posted by Slipwater
    So we wait for a big hand? I think you're missing the point here, it matters not whether we are behind, what matters is our EV on calling here, also we have almost no fold equity if we wait for a hand to shove with as we have to post 600 in the sb the very next hand which leaves op 2bbs and possibly being in a multiway pot when we do get it in.... Folding here pretty much means we are folding our way out of the torny....Just because we get it in on the next hand with AX does not mean we have anymore equity to win the hand as for each player in the pot our equity will be much lower, so its more than feesable to have more equity here with 67 vs 1 player than it will be if we hold AK vs 2 players.. eg 67 37% vs KJ 62%, if we shove with AK and end up in a multi way pot vs trash..AK 36% J10h 34% 67c 28%, so just because we wait for a better hand does not mean we will have more equity when it goes in.

    We never fold when facing 3/1 pot odds unless its on the bubble, but 6 away from a prize we don't have that option imo
  • edited January 2014

    Was thinking if I fold, I've still got some fold equity in some spots.

    If it's folded to me in the small blind next hand for example.

    Or if not I then have 4 hands to find a spot to get it in first, potentially with 60+% equity rather than <40% ?

    Worst case scenario, I get it in in this kind of spot again, but officially for my tournament life rather than effectively for my tournament life (like here).
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    Was thinking if I fold, I've still got some fold equity in some spots. If it's folded to me in the small blind next hand for example. Or if not I then have 4 hands to find a spot to get it in first, potentially with 60+% equity rather than <40% ? Worst case scenario, I get it in in this kind of spot again, but officially for my tournament life rather than effectively for my tournament life (like here).
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    its unlikely that you're going to find a spot now where you will have 60+ equity given that you will only have 2bbs if you fold. It's high likely that you're going to be multi-way. Also you have 0 fold equity if you do fold because you give the bb an auto call when you shove, just like this is an auto call.

    I remember Casper Berry saying that you never ever fold when facing 3/1 odds..ever. Thats stayed with me and i know why..because it's a mathmatical nightmare when you do fold given such great odds.
  • edited January 2014
    I don't add up the percentages and fractions and ratios and divide by this and subtract that and blah blah, mugsy. I look at the hand. I look at the stacks. Then I take it from there. To be honest, I think most players do those things.

    But maybe that's why you're a better poker player than I am.
  • edited January 2014
    Think I'll plump for Chicken and mushroom flavour tonight.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    Think I'll plump for Chicken and mushroom flavour tonight.
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    Whack a Chicago Town pizza in the oven - Sloppy Joe. Mine's almost ready :)
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    Was thinking if I fold, I've still got some fold equity in some spots. If it's folded to me in the small blind next hand for example. Or if not I then have 4 hands to find a spot to get it in first, potentially with 60+% equity rather than <40% ? Worst case scenario, I get it in in this kind of spot again, but officially for my tournament life rather than effectively for my tournament life (like here).
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    With 2bbs I doubt your going to find many spots where u have any FE.

    I think it's much closer if there's 2-3 players to bust, as there's 6 I think given the price it's a meh call.

    If you double here you have a stack size we can put pressure on people with in the right spots.
  • edited January 2014
    its a call 1.19  to win like 4k more then lieky ya up against 2 hig cards so its a 60/40  and ya getting 3/1
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    I don't add up the percentages and fractions and ratios and divide by this and subtract that and blah blah, mugsy. I look at the hand. I look at the stacks. Then I take it from there. To be honest, I think most players do those things. But maybe that's why you're a better poker player than I am.
    Posted by Slipwater
    Is that what you think? Every other thread in this section equity is frequently mentioned. I'm sure the micro stakes players on Deuces Cracked and 2+2 would disagree. Looking at the stacks is the way we calc what equity  we need in the hand to break even on our call, so it seems you look at stacks etc and get what answer? We use pot odds ,equity, implied odds, reverse implied, EV etc etc to work out if we are making sound or bad investments in the long term ie what our expected value is.

    It does not really bother me much whether you care about all those above, but i can say this, every torny chip, or cash game £ what you push into the middle has an EV on it whether you are thinking about it or not.

    Knowing what equity we need in a hand is a solid platform to base our decisions, then we add other factors on top.
    To state most poker players do not think this way simply isn't true, however i agree with you on one thing you have said and that there isn't enough ample time here on SKY to play thinking poker, the time alocated is so fast and no time bank makes it hard to think about all the things we should/need to think about.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : Is that what you think? Every other thread in this section equity is frequently mentioned. I'm sure the micro stakes players on Deuces Cracked and 2+2 would disagree. Looking at the stacks is the way we calc what equity  we need in the hand to break even on our call, so it seems you look at stacks etc and get what answer? We use pot odds ,equity, implied odds, reverse implied, EV etc etc to work out if we are making sound or bad investments in the long term ie what our expected value is. It does not really bother me much whether you care about all those above, but i can say this, every torny chip, or cash game £ what you push into the middle has an EV on it whether you are thinking about it or not. Knowing what equity we need in a hand is a solid platform to base our decisions, then we add other factors on top. To state most poker players do not think this way simply isn't true, however i agree with you on one thing you have said and that there isn't enough ample time here on SKY to play thinking poker, the time alocated is so fast and no time bank makes it hard to think about all the things we should/need to think about.
    Posted by mugsy78
    I actually didn't say that at all, mugsy. I said most people think about the things I mentioned.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : I actually didn't say that at all, mugsy. I said most people think about the things I mentioned.
    Posted by Slipwater
    /wp  /gg

    @op. Sorry for slight derail. Elvis has left the building.
  • edited January 2014

    np :)

    Verdict is conclusive then, we calllllll.

    Don't normally need any encouragement to click that button.

    I did fold

    Not that it matters but I found 88 the next orbit when utg, which is like pre flop quads in that spot.

    Straight in to tens :(

    Lesson learnt.

    Thnx all.

    Another vote for chicken n mushroom btw. not even close.

    Pot noodles aren't the same anymore though, bring back e-numbers.
  • edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold?:
    In Response to Re: Sat call or fold? : /wp  /gg
    Posted by mugsy78
    No worries :)

    Unlucky with the fold, DOH
Sign In or Register to comment.