Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Have bounty hunters warped peoples sense of playing poker?
I'll just start by saying I am not talking about the financial side of things. People pay the same amount and can do what they like. Also I am not talking about the aggressor in a hand but the callers.
I was just wondering what people thought. I play most of my poker at fairly low stakes (£3-£11), I play the odd main event and have once played a £55 bounty hunter (finished 2nd-cheeky brag lol). Sometimes it astounds me at what people will call off all, or most of their stack with, even when really deep. Bearing in mind when talking about low stakes it isn't as if the head prize is even worth having! At higher stakes where somebodies head could be worth£100 that may factor in to odds to call but at low stakes I don't think this applies, especially if you have 50-100bb.
Even when play progresses throughout a tournament, players on sky seem to have a "play for stacks" attitude whenever they get involved in a hand, regardless of stack sizes. They just don't seem to have a concept of pot control or value betting.
This isn't a rant (if it seems that way) I was merely pondering the point of the title.
Whadaya think???
0 ·
Comments
I just like to see the BOUNTY HUNTER ripple writing across my face, (on the old tables) it makes me feel smug hahahaha!!
The second situation where winning a bounty is useful is again near the start of a tournament but this time you are a relatively short stack and another short stack goes all in. This is often a great spot for you unless the short stack has a really tight range - you should be willing to get it in with a wider range. Your stack size as it is dictates it's unlikely you will cash so you want to really get some of your entry fee back. If you can take out the short stack that then that's great. Another point is at least one other player will want to get involved to take out 2 bounties. So instead of doubling up where you still might be short - you could treble up WITH a bounty and be right back in the game. This can also apply to later on in tournaments depending on how short you are because it might be your best chance to get back into it.
I love the Bounty Hunters, great fun and profitable. For the most part I ignore the head-prizes and play to win the tournament. By far the most common mistake I see being made by others is reckless gambling to win head-prizes, particularly in the early stages. It's frustrating when they get there, but you have to take it on the chin and remember you profit off these guys in the long run. It's very important the bad players win sometimes, it keeps them in the games. We don't want them to lose all their money quickly and quit permanently.
As explained by F Ivanovich there are exceptions. I had a classic example yesterday at a £5.75 final table. Last to act on the BB I was facing a 4.2BB shove from UTG looking down at junk. In a freeze-out you could just about argue for a fold, needing to call 3.2BB to win 5.7BB when you know you're behind 100% of the time. However this villain had a prize of £8.02 on his head making it a no-brainer call with any two cards.
Player A has roughly 7500 chips and shoves from the button (there was no other betting before that)
Player B Small blind has slightly more chips and calls.....
Player C Big blind has 4300 chips and also calls
cards are turned over... Player A shows kk, Player B shows aa, Player C shows ........ 2 3 of hearts
can't remember the cards the fell (I'm writing this from memory) but player C wins on the river with a flush...
Player B obviously more than a little annoyed says htf can you call two shoves with a 2 and a 3
I though Players C's response was a gem...... he said "cus I might win"
go figure......
Lost count.