You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Boo
In Response to DYM'S Beware of JOHN CONNOR:
Sounds like good DYM strategy to me.
For those new players who read the previous posts by Sky Poker with JOHN CONNOR BEWARE! The strategy he is telling you all about he does not abide by. I have played with JOHN CONNOR and players like him, who trawl the DYM's for suckers. JOHN CONNOR plays only Aces or Kings or hopes for Big Blind Specials, he folds EVERY other hands and wait for two players to bust, he then just goes all in when blinds get higher, if he is betting early to mid levels unless you have the nuts I'd watch out. The strategy he is trying to convince you all to play is for normal sit and go's even tournement play. Players like him I have no doubt win at these by drawing in new players convincing them to start with DYM'S, there is a reason sky and John want you to listen EASY MONEY! I said I'd expose players like you John who probably are pretty good at poker in general but not when I see this convincing people to play. I can name a few others for people to look out for I'd advise playing against them. They also shockingly seem to run well! The bounty hunters are more fun Good Luck
Posted by jonpaulf29
Sounds like good DYM strategy to me.
Comments
I've played DYM's for about 3 years now and have shared tables with many of the regs (including JC).
His guide,and it is only a guide, is as relevant today as when it was written 3 years ago.
I'm guessing, but might be wrong, that you haven't quite grasped the mindset needed for DYM's.
Some people can look it and say its not "proper poker" but its just another form of poker.
I notice you like the BH's more, perhaps you could spare some of your own time to write a blog on how to play BH's?
You cannot say things like that unless you have proof.
It makes no more sense than to say, for example, that "the best hand loses 90% of the time". Which you said yesterday on a different thread.
There are a million inflections & nuances available.
John Connor is not a "liar", any more than "the best hand loses 90% of the time in DYM's" is true. But I'd not call the author of that statement a "liar", so please be a little more careful with your wording.
Thank you.
How are you these days? Can't recall when I last saw you, was it Walsall GUKPT, the time Scotty made the Final? Anyway, I hope you & yours are well.
I'd like a quid for every SNG you must have played on Sky Poker down the years!
Which is why I thought it was out of order to hear his integrity & honesty questioned on this thread. Hopefully, the OP willl withdraw his comments & apologise to John.
Bit of a dilemmna that. When Sky delete or close threads all sorts of hoohah goes off, sometimes with good reason.
In THIS case, I think it was right to leave it open.
Why?
ALL the responses seemed to work out what it was REALLY about, & were 100% supportive of JC. I don't think a soul believed that JC had been deliberately misinforming anyone.
The same chap started another thread, claiming that "90% of the time, I lose with the best hand". I suggested he produced the Hand Histories.
I hear what you say, & why, but I don't believe JC's character has been damaged one iota. The thread policed itself, & there were no buyers.
I find I play 90% of the best hands incorrectly 90% of the time,so I would not notice owt wrong anyway :-D......thought that was why the poker gods gave me such few good /best hands........as it probably it is a waste of time..but with help from the likes of John..maybe there is hope for me yet....... :-)