You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

message to colchester and those on his table

edited September 2014 in Poker Chat
i am sorry for the way i reacted to after going out to the limped pot.

i was shaking in anger and fealt like needing to let it out.
sorry for the abuse and i should just learn to control tilt

as for the hand well i should have just did min bets mself because calling them all were what made me unknown where i was.
ecksmen Small blind   500.00 500.00 34368.75
craigcu12 Big blind   1000.00 1500.00 15411.25
  Your hole cards
  • J
  • 9
     
mrtee Fold        
colchester Call   1000.00 2500.00 19110.00
AMBER58 Fold        
ecksmen Call   500.00 3000.00 33868.75
craigcu12 Check        
Flop
   
  • A
  • J
  • J
     
ecksmen Check        
craigcu12 Check        
colchester Bet   2000.00 5000.00 17110.00
ecksmen Call   2000.00 7000.00 31868.75
craigcu12 Call   2000.00 9000.00 13411.25
Turn
   
  • 6
     
ecksmen Check        
craigcu12 Check        
colchester Bet   5000.00 14000.00 12110.00
ecksmen Fold        
craigcu12 Call   5000.00 19000.00 8411.25
River
   
  • 8
     
craigcu12 Check        
colchester Bet   9500.00 28500.00 2610.00
craigcu12 All-in   8411.25 36911.25 0.00
colchester Unmatched bet   1088.75 35822.50 3698.75
craigcu12 Show
  • J
  • 9
     
colchester Show
  • J
  • 10
     
colchester Win Three Jacks 35822.50   39521.25

Comments

  • edited September 2014
    In Response to message to colchester and those on his table:
    i should have just did min bets mself because calling them all were what made me unknown where i was. 

    Not even you can avoid going broke here Craig. 
  • edited September 2014
    not even a squeeeeze shove spot ?   punish the limpers
  • edited September 2014
    How can you get abusive here, you were meant to lose!
  • edited September 2014
    Played perfect, ul
  • edited September 2014
    In Response to Re: message to colchester and those on his table:
    How can you get abusive here, you were meant to lose!
    Posted by Slykllist
    but i'm meant to fold pre.
    sadly this person opted to limp in preflop rather than raise.

    saying i was meant to loose that is like saying i was meant to win with 32s
    no of course not i was meant to fold pre but i won because i was allowed
    lewis274 Small blind   75.00 75.00 1318.75
    craigcu12 Big blind   150.00 225.00 6455.00
      Your hole cards
    • 3
    • 2
         
    haylez83 Fold        
    limp Call   150.00 375.00 2390.00
    92boi Fold        
    x Call   150.00 525.00 6123.75
    lewis274 Call   75.00 600.00 1243.75
    craigcu12 Check        
    Flop
       
    • A
    • 7
    • 4
         
    lewis274 Check        
    craigcu12 Check        
    limp Check        
    x Bet   300.00 900.00 5823.75
    lewis274 Fold        
    craigcu12 Raise   600.00 1500.00 5855.00
    limp Fold        
    x Call   300.00 1800.00 5523.75
    Turn
       
    • 8
         
    craigcu12 Bet   600.00 2400.00 5255.00
    x Call   600.00 3000.00 4923.75
    River
       
    • 6
         
    craigcu12 Bet   600.00 3600.00 4655.00
    x Call   600.00 4200.00 4323.75
    craigcu12 Show
    • 3
    • 2
         
    x Muck
    • 10
    • A
         
    craigcu12 Win Flush to the Ace 4200.00   8855.00
  • edited September 2014

    Craig you have to be a level. 
  • edited September 2014
    cant see any reason to be abusive though, just a tough spot where most of the time your gonna lose a lot of chips.
  • edited September 2014
    Craig,

    You have me confused.

    You appear to be saying J9s is never in your calling range from the BB and you only lost because it was a limped pot?

    1. I think that is leak right there - plenty of times you can call/raise with J9s either when very deep stacked or when getting shallow and there is a lot of min raise stealing going on. Most of the time you can bin it sure, but there are plenty of situations where it is good enough to get involved. All depends on table and player dynamics.

    2. Getting to see a flop with any hand and hitting trips is great. You were just ul. Normally in those situations it is the limper with A6 or something going broke and wishing they had raised.
  • edited September 2014
    Craig, you seem to have major beef with limpers. It's just part and parcel of the game. Bet you were loving when you got a free flop with J9s, 15bb and flopped huge. Just unfortunate to be outkicked this time, but you're never getting away from the hand. No need to kick off at other players though, it's their money they can play how they desire.

    FWIW, I think we can shove J9 pre depending on the table dynamic. Should probably bet way more on the river with the 32s as well.
  • edited September 2014
    Given the line Colchester has taken (limping then firing three streets starting off into 2 opponents), is there not an argument for calling river rather than shoving given Jx makes up a decent part of a limpers range? Or am I turning into a nit? 

    I have to agree with the other guys, standard play would be our opponent to min open and us to peel from the BB.

    We cant do anything about how opponents play, if we feel their plays are non optimal then its down to us to come up with optimal strategies to beat them. Getting mad about it doesn't do us any good!
  • edited September 2014
    Villain sets him all in on the river Matt. Read the bloody hand properly ;)
  • edited September 2014
    In Response to Re: message to colchester and those on his table:
    Villain sets him all in on the river Matt. Read the bloody hand properly ;)
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    HH are hard!
  • edited September 2014
    when he limps and you see a flop you go broke what else?
    Had he min raised like he probably should, then you should call and see a flop and go broke.
    About the only way you could be saved was if he pushed all in pre flop. Thats probably not the optimum play so It was your turn to be cold decked, and heres me thinking it was just me it happened to :-)

  • edited September 2014
    so is it just me that see a limp sb just calls i see this as weakness   so i am shoving all in 16 bigs to pick up a extra 2 bb   i think this is the right move and im not just saying that coz i can see the hh
  • edited September 2014
    Whats wrong with jamming pre here Craig?
  • edited September 2014
    Also if you were shaking in anger maybe poker is not for you its time to find another hobby.
  • edited September 2014
    In Response to Re: message to colchester and those on his table:
    when he limps and you see a flop you go broke what else? Had he min raised like he probably should, then you should call and see a flop and go broke. About the only way you could be saved was if he pushed all in pre flop. Thats probably not the optimum play so It was your turn to be cold decked, and heres me thinking it was just me it happened to :-)
    Posted by Sir-Gary
    just to say i love that icon

    although i need to change my glasses as it seems to look like a fish, not the great white shark that you actually are.
  • edited September 2014
    In Response to Re: message to colchester and those on his table:
    Whats wrong with jamming pre here Craig?
    Posted by Matt237
    maybe that is where the issue lies.
    if i had say 8 BB then i would be shipping lots but here i have 15 so i'm thinking a check is better.

    if i were to shove i'm certain he is going to be calling things that are ahead, then again i do see lots of things folded too and J10 is more than likely a one itself. the bubble had now burst so head prizes were no longer any use, laddering was there aim.

    merhaps any two cards between K and 9 i shove because it's only really AK-A9 and KQ-Kj i'm really in danger from but TBH i see weak aces weak kings and middle suited cards more often than i see AK-AJ or KQ.
  • edited September 2014
    In Response to Re: message to colchester and those on his table:
    In Response to Re: message to colchester and those on his table : maybe that is where the issue lies. if i had say 8 BB then i would be shipping lots but here i have 15 so i'm thinking a check is better. if i were to shove i'm certain he is going to be calling things that are ahead, then again i do see lots of things folded too and J10 is more than likely a one itself. the bubble had now burst so head prizes were no longer any use, laddering was there aim. merhaps any two cards between K and 9 i shove because it's only really AK-A9 and KQ-Kj i'm really in danger from but TBH i see weak aces weak kings and middle suited cards more often than i see AK-AJ or KQ.
    Posted by craigcu12
    Blinding down to 8bb in a BH before chucking your stack about is a dangerous game.

    And if you were just in the money, then laddering isn't really a consideration yet as the jumps are so small initially. If anything, winning another head prize is more valuable in terms of the £££ than going up two pay jumps and busting.
  • edited September 2014
    this time they didn't get to see the flops they wanted cheaply. so i might as well do it.
    a Small blind   50.00 50.00 6932.50
    craigcu12 Big blind   100.00 150.00 2640.00
      Your hole cards
    • 10
    • J
         
    banger1207 Fold        
    c Call   100.00 250.00 4215.00
    b Call   100.00 350.00 5440.00
    bearlyther Fold        
    a Call   50.00 400.00 6882.50
    craigcu12 All-in   2640.00 3040.00 0.00
    c Fold        
    b Fold        
    a Fold        
    craigcu12 Muck        
    craigcu12 Win   400.00   400.00
    craigcu12 Return   2640.00 0.00 3040.00
  • edited September 2014
    No offence but that's a terrible shove, 16xBB is massively different to 26xBB. Your risk/reward here is terrible cos u don't win that much and when u get a call gl being better than 30% equity.

    We can either raise to like 450-500 (imo) or take the free flop. I prefer the free flop option cos I wanna be multiway with this hand and pots already plenty big enough to get stacks in cos of all the limpers
  • edited September 2014
    I have seen in a few posts you do a certain play and based on your sample of 1 you decide whether a play is good or not.
  • edited September 2014
    Does any one know the actual formula you use for working out the EV of a shove?

    Say in the above example if we expect to get folds 2/3 of the time and have 35% average equity when we get called, how do we go about working out how many chips we win/ lose on average by shoving.

    66% of the time we win 400 chips.
    33% of the time we lose 5500/3 = 1850 - 2600 (our stack) so - 750

    So it makes the shove + EV by 50 chips?

    Is that right?
  • edited September 2014
    The numbers are probably wrong, and I kind of plucked the FE and hand equity out of the air, but I mean is the actual formula for working it out right?
  • edited September 2014
    Our equity in this spot, in general, I'd imagine to be closer to 40-45% over a good sample.

    But it is a bizarre shove Craig, and as Matt says, you do a certain move once and seem to think it must be a successful play or the most optimal line.

    More than happy to take a free flop here, great multi way hand.
Sign In or Register to comment.