You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
ecksmen | Small blind | 500.00 | 500.00 | 34368.75 | |
craigcu12 | Big blind | 1000.00 | 1500.00 | 15411.25 | |
Your hole cards |
| ||||
mrtee | Fold | ||||
colchester | Call | 1000.00 | 2500.00 | 19110.00 | |
AMBER58 | Fold | ||||
ecksmen | Call | 500.00 | 3000.00 | 33868.75 | |
craigcu12 | Check | ||||
Flop | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
ecksmen | Check | ||||
craigcu12 | Check | ||||
colchester | Bet | 2000.00 | 5000.00 | 17110.00 | |
ecksmen | Call | 2000.00 | 7000.00 | 31868.75 | |
craigcu12 | Call | 2000.00 | 9000.00 | 13411.25 | |
Turn | |||||
| |||||
ecksmen | Check | ||||
craigcu12 | Check | ||||
colchester | Bet | 5000.00 | 14000.00 | 12110.00 | |
ecksmen | Fold | ||||
craigcu12 | Call | 5000.00 | 19000.00 | 8411.25 | |
River | |||||
| |||||
craigcu12 | Check | ||||
colchester | Bet | 9500.00 | 28500.00 | 2610.00 | |
craigcu12 | All-in | 8411.25 | 36911.25 | 0.00 | |
colchester | Unmatched bet | 1088.75 | 35822.50 | 3698.75 | |
craigcu12 | Show |
| |||
colchester | Show |
| |||
colchester | Win | Three Jacks | 35822.50 | 39521.25 |
Comments
sadly this person opted to limp in preflop rather than raise.
saying i was meant to loose that is like saying i was meant to win with 32s
no of course not i was meant to fold pre but i won because i was allowed
You have me confused.
You appear to be saying J9s is never in your calling range from the BB and you only lost because it was a limped pot?
1. I think that is leak right there - plenty of times you can call/raise with J9s either when very deep stacked or when getting shallow and there is a lot of min raise stealing going on. Most of the time you can bin it sure, but there are plenty of situations where it is good enough to get involved. All depends on table and player dynamics.
2. Getting to see a flop with any hand and hitting trips is great. You were just ul. Normally in those situations it is the limper with A6 or something going broke and wishing they had raised.
FWIW, I think we can shove J9 pre depending on the table dynamic. Should probably bet way more on the river with the 32s as well.
I have to agree with the other guys, standard play would be our opponent to min open and us to peel from the BB.
We cant do anything about how opponents play, if we feel their plays are non optimal then its down to us to come up with optimal strategies to beat them. Getting mad about it doesn't do us any good!
although i need to change my glasses as it seems to look like a fish, not the great white shark that you actually are.
if i had say 8 BB then i would be shipping lots but here i have 15 so i'm thinking a check is better.
if i were to shove i'm certain he is going to be calling things that are ahead, then again i do see lots of things folded too and J10 is more than likely a one itself. the bubble had now burst so head prizes were no longer any use, laddering was there aim.
merhaps any two cards between K and 9 i shove because it's only really AK-A9 and KQ-Kj i'm really in danger from but TBH i see weak aces weak kings and middle suited cards more often than i see AK-AJ or KQ.
And if you were just in the money, then laddering isn't really a consideration yet as the jumps are so small initially. If anything, winning another head prize is more valuable in terms of the £££ than going up two pay jumps and busting.
Say in the above example if we expect to get folds 2/3 of the time and have 35% average equity when we get called, how do we go about working out how many chips we win/ lose on average by shoving.
66% of the time we win 400 chips.
33% of the time we lose 5500/3 = 1850 - 2600 (our stack) so - 750
So it makes the shove + EV by 50 chips?
Is that right?
But it is a bizarre shove Craig, and as Matt says, you do a certain move once and seem to think it must be a successful play or the most optimal line.
More than happy to take a free flop here, great multi way hand.