You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Few questions to you guys

2»

Comments

  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I'm pretty sure you have spouted about volume volume volume yourself, as ambassador also could you comment on this please...  http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/internet-poker/sky-poker-collusion-why-no-action-1524803/index23.html
    Posted by kebawo
    You asked nicely, but no thanks. I don't really fancy spending my afternoon reading a 23 page thread about two people colluding in an Mtt which I believe has been dealt with by the site some time ago so that you can spend more of my time with supplementary questions.

     I think I've now spent more time than I'd have liked on this thread.

     

     
  • edited May 2015


    someone who has recently "left" skypoker?





  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : You asked nicely, but no thanks. I don't really fancy spending my afternoon reading a 23 page thread about two people colluding in an Mtt which I believe has been dealt with by the site some time ago so that you can spend more of my time with supplementary questions.  I think I've now spent more time than I'd have liked on this thread.    
    Posted by NChanning
    Oh right I would love to know your guys opinions on if a no-name non regular was caught colluding compared to a 10k poster that's been here for years 
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
     In your world it's kind of hard to be a pro-poker player Mr Kebawo. If they win it's because the site is rigged, if they lose they aren't going to make a living and aren't professionals.  Did your ancestors have anything to do with prosecuting people for witchcraft?  I might suggest that you could spend the time you are currently spending on conspiracy theories studying the game, reading articles, watching videos, discussing hands and attempting to improve. Perhaps then you'd start winning again and stop being quite so bitter.
    Posted by NChanning
    Haha.  There was an Inside No.9 Episode on this in the latest series. Worth digging out if you haven't seen it and have 30mins spare. The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge. 
  • edited May 2015
    Say what you want. You need proof to back it up. Provide the evidence instead of trying to provoke and bring the site down. If you're going to play then play. If not then why join just to start a post to stir up stuff? Put your money on the tables and play
  • edited May 2015
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
    Posted by kebawo


    So have you decided to play on the site then, I think that was the point of your OP, or was it just to troll?

  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
    Posted by kebawo
    You would need a friend to do that!
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : So have you decided to play on the site then, I think that was the point of your OP, or was it just to troll?
    Posted by HENDRIK62
    Just dodging the question as always, I'm pretty sure if sky/tikay came out and openly said they were cheating you guys out of money you would still defend them
  • edited May 2015
    So er... how about that local sports team?
  • edited May 2015
    Where is your PROOF! You said you've done research so what research was it and also as i said where is the proof of your findings? DYM is a total different kettle of fish so why bring that up??
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : Just dodging the question as always, I'm pretty sure if sky/tikay came out and openly said they were cheated you guys out of money you would still defend them
    Posted by kebawo
    I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but......

    You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-))

    I would certainly not defend them.

  • edited May 2015
    well played you found the edit button.
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but...... You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-)) I would certainly not defend them.
    Posted by HENDRIK62
    Hey! That's my job.

    But you've got a point there, Jimi.
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I find your sentence structure is detracting from the point you are trying to make but...... You are mistaken, anyone that knows me can tell you I am as tight as a ducks **** (sorry Mrs Duck ;-)) I would certainly not defend them.
    Posted by HENDRIK62
    Nothing wrong with a ducks bottom! :)
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt??
    Posted by kebawo

    There was a recent incident where collusion was reported, investigated and dealt with. The incident you refer to was also reported, investigated and dealt with.

    What more can the operator actually do?
  • edited May 2015
    So, you're not thinking of joining Sky Poker at all... it's just a (very) thinly velied dig at a couple of bad eggs in a pretty large basket.

    Correct?
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
    Posted by kebawo
    We do not take the length of time players have been registered/how many posts they have made on the forum into consideration when banning players from the site. If you are deemed to have been colluding with other players and we are confident you have done so then yes, we will most likely suspend your account indefinitely.

    However not all cases are black & white. Seeing someone fold Aces to another player preflop or not calling an extra 100 chips into a pot of 5000 when they hold a strong hand, okay, that's easy to spot. But sometimes people make genuine mistakes, misclicks, get disconnected etc.

    I can assure you that we are improving the way in which we monitor collusion and are focused on a number of specific areas (that I won't go into) over the coming months.
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt??
    Posted by kebawo

    What I do find annoying is that you made an original post that many people on here replied to in good faith. You then went on to abuse this good faith and peddle a different message.

  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    The point i'm trying to make is that RV guy got away with colluding on this site as he's a well known brown noser/regular on the forum, yet if a randomer decided he wanted to do that they would be banned instantly. Now in my eyes that's corrupt/biased so why the f do you guys think it's wrong to call out a site when they've proven to be corrupt??
    Posted by kebawo
    He got away with it so well that he's permanently banned from the site...

    It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves.

    I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing.  Right?
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : He got away with it so well that he's permanently banned from the site... It's also a total disgrace that Sky Poker don't regularly access private messages between players on a website totally unconnected with Sky Poker, just on the off-chance that they uncover the possibilty of any wrong-doings themselves. I mean, every other poker site out there snoops on all forms of communications between members of its player pool in order to guarantee that they eliminate 100% of any possible wrong-doing.  Right?
    Posted by shakinaces
    I am almost positive I detect sarcasm here.

    Right?
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    Everyone just going to ignore the fact that people are treated different on this site? If I was to join a DYM and collude my t!ts off i'm pretty sure I'd be banned today
    Posted by kebawo
    OOOOH - HE SAID BOOBIES!........ (ish)    :D
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : I am almost positive I detect sarcasm here. Right?
    Posted by Slipwater
    Hi Slip - without doubt sir, you have the greatest shirt collection of any poster on this forum.

    Sorry, what was your question again?
  • edited May 2015
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys:
    In Response to Re: Few questions to you guys : Hi Slip - without doubt sir, you have the greatest shirt collection of any poster on this forum. Sorry, what was your question again?
    Posted by shakinaces
    My mistake.

    None whatsoever.
  • edited May 2015
    sky have their rng checked every year so i heard,they just dont update the info on the site
Sign In or Register to comment.