Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
In the recent WSOP that Orford and Channing did, Neil described Phil Hellmuth as bit like 'a yeast based spread, you love him or you loathe him'.
See here for more on that but in the meantime...
0 ·
Comments
His record is exceptional and despite some of his 'entertaining' on-table antics, he seems to be a real classy bloke off the tables.
Can only admire his record.
But the brattish rants leave me cold.
Like many people my age I first got interested in NL holdem via Late Night Poker. While at first the characters like Devlifish/Jackarama etc stood out, I remember being in awe when Phil came over and totally beat up the opposition and also had the front to tell people what they were on before either making a good fold or call or making a bet he know they couldn't call.
I can also remember seeing the other side when he went on a rant on the same show when bust.
Would have hoped he would have learned some humility by now and become a better ambassador for the game that has served him so well.
Even in this years WSOP he was having a go at the dealer when it was Heads Up. I'm sure it was designed to try and unsettle his opponent, in much the same way John McEnroe's tennis rants were in the 80s.
He's been allowed to get away with stuff that other players would have got a penalty for, for years.
Not everyone is a fan of those with the greatest records, see Alex Ferguson for another recent example, so I've voted no.
I don't agree with picking on ams, or dealers, but he does seem very different off the table. Not entirely sure why the difference...
All the famous poker brat behaviour is put on for TV in my opinion. Apparently when the cameras aren't running he's as much a gentleman at the table as he is off.
He's great for the game. The biggest personality in poker. His incredible record speaks for itself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sFJ-de4E3Y