Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Advice: poker as sole income/ NI contributions
A couple of people have asked me about what happens with national insurance when poker is your sole income and i'm pretty clueless about it all so was hoping to get some advice from some other pros in here, is it a case of just paying monthly/yearly? anyone have something setup who can fill me in a bit on the best way to approach the situation would be appreciated.
0 ·
Comments
You only need 35 years contributions to qualify for full pension
So even if pension age stays at 67 (which probably wont), you only need to start with contributions at the age of 32. Obviously later if you have already made contributions in previous employment.
You can also back date voluntary contributions, if you need to.
My investment plans consist of save up buy a house then repeat.
It is correct gambling is not taxable, but you have to have so many years ni contributions to get full state pension. Many people who are non employed (for whatever reason) will still actually get the voluntry contributions.
If you want to read further it goes into detail on goverment websites, just google national insurance contributions.
PS-at present, poker "earnings" are not taxable, but never assume that this will always be the case....
It's enshrined in tax law. Would get plenty of notice if they ever thought about changing it as it would take years to change.
Turning to gambling being taxable, with the greatest of respect, that is rather more complex than a 91 year old case. Traditionally, the only thing that was "enshrined" in law was that gambling contracts were unenforceable, but hundreds of years of case law was removed by a statute and a statutory instrument.
Firstly, there have been many arguments as to whether poker is gambling or a game of skill. There was considerable press coverage about this last year, together with speculation re the Government looking to change its position. For tax purposes, it is better (for us) that poker is regarded as just gambling.
Secondly, countries that have introduced such taxes (and there are many) did not all give "plenty of notice", any more than for the various restrictions placed on playing in various parts of the world.
I sincerely hope that there is no change. Failing that, I hope there is lots of notice before such change. However, I would not rely on it! That said, I hope that the recent changes in taxing companies at source makes change less likely