sharkscope

unknown_username

i rarely go on sharkscope and iv,e got the day off so i thought i,d have a look,what i noticed and never seen before is that there is an acheivement tab with a pack of cards as acheivements has anybody filled up the pack ?

if not what have people acheived.

iv,e got 7 clubs 8 diamonds 9 spades inc ace of spades and 4 hearts

unknown_username

also my average ROI IS 9.5% "is that any good?" but my total ROI is -0.6 % which i presume is rubbish

weecheez1

Haven't got a clue what it means but it seems iv got 42 goldfish 

aussie09

In Response to Re: sharkscope:

also my average ROI IS 9.5% "is that any good?" but my total ROI is -0.6 % which i presume is rubbish
Posted by stokefc

both ROI% are good, imo.

it depends on what is being measured though. 

average ROI% can be misleading as you can only be -100% if you lose in one game but you can be +30,000% if you win a big tournament.  how you average those results is another question.  average ROI% might not be too reliable. 

total ROI% is likely to be more meaningful.  i am unsure whether sharkscope's figures are accurate though.  you will know though by looking at your bank statement and roll.  that will tell you the true answer.

on those figures, welll done.  breaking even in something the vast majority aspire to.

unknown_username

thx aussie iv,e not deposited since july

aussie09

In Response to Re: sharkscope:

thx aussie iv,e not deposited since july
Posted by stokefc

that's brilliant, stokey.



 

pomfrittes

In Response to Re: sharkscope:

thx aussie iv,e not deposited since july
Posted by stokefc

  Have you tried prunes?

HENDRIK62

In Response to Re: sharkscope:

In Response to Re: sharkscope :   Have you tried prunes?
Posted by pomfrittes

:-)

FeelGroggy

In Response to Re: sharkscope:

In Response to Re: sharkscope : both ROI% are good, imo. it depends on what is being measured though.  average ROI% can be misleading as you can only be -100% if you lose in one game but you can be +30,000% if you win a big tournament.  how you average those results is another question.  average ROI% might not be too reliable.  total ROI% is likely to be more meaningful.  i am unsure whether sharkscope's figures are accurate though.  you will know though by looking at your bank statement and roll.  that will tell you the true answer. on those figures, welll done.  breaking even in something the vast majority aspire to.
Posted by aussie09

I'd be inclined to think average ROI is a better measure to use. Imagine a player plays 21 HU SNG'S, 20 £1 ones and one £100 one. They lose all the £1 ones and win the £100 one. Despite losing 20/21 games their total ROI would be extremely good, their average ROI would not. Average ROI is probably better to use over the longer term (someone correct me if i'm wrong)

unknown_username

In Response to Re: sharkscope:

In Response to Re: sharkscope :   Have you tried prunes?
Posted by pomfrittes

vindaloo tonight :0

incidently the ROI is over nearly 8500 games i dont know if sngs are inc i am predominantly a mtt specialist