Much better than the drivel in players personnel self ego boosting diaries. I agree they all should be moved too. But the Forum cliche don't. There is even a Virtual Bar on here somewhere I have been told. Crikey.
To get the forum really busy.....attract more drunk posts. They really liven things up.
Cheers again for all the hard work you put into your Result page Rob. Ignore the haters/jealous folk.
Poker results in Poker Chat. How it should be Much better than the drivel in players personnel self ego boosting diaries. I agree they all should be moved too. But the Forum cliche don't. There is even a Virtual Bar on here somewhere I have been told. Crikey. To get the forum really busy.....attract more drunk posts. They really liven things up. Cheers again for all the hard work you put into your Result page Rob. Ignore the haters/jealous folk. Posted by MAXALLY
What a drainer you are. Bet you're so much fun down the virtual pub.
Poker results in Poker Chat. How it should be Much better than the drivel in players personnel self ego boosting diaries. I agree they all should be moved too. But the Forum cliche don't. There is even a Virtual Bar on here somewhere I have been told. Crikey. To get the forum really busy.....attract more drunk posts. They really liven things up. Cheers again for all the hard work you put into your Result page Rob. Ignore the haters/jealous folk. Posted by MAXALLY
Which cliché?
Pot calling kettle black? A diamond in the rough? Every cloud has a silver lining? The writings on the wall? Cat got your tongue?
Poker results in Poker Chat. How it should be Much better than the drivel in players personnel self ego boosting diaries. I agree they all should be moved too. But the Forum cliche don't. There is even a Virtual Bar on here somewhere I have been told. Crikey. To get the forum really busy.....attract more drunk posts. They really liven things up. Cheers again for all the hard work you put into your Result page Rob. Ignore the haters/jealous folk. Posted by MAXALLY
I don't see a problem with the best player poll, but I have no idea why you keep starting a new thread for each day. Just compile them into a single thread, similar to what Gary does.
I don't see a problem with the best player poll, but I have no idea why you keep starting a new thread for each day. Just compile them into a single thread, similar to what Gary does. Posted by percival09
yes, that's a good point. i used to do that. it is a recent change. i was deliberating which way is most useful. one thing is now clear is that neither format get any/many posts in response. this poll will give me the info i am looking for. it looks like the audience for tables, results etc is no longer in poker chat. we'll see.
In Response to Re: *** Best Player *** POLL : yes, that's a good point. i used to do that. it is a recent change. i was deliberating which way is most useful. one thing is now clear is that neither format get any/many posts in response. this poll will give me the info i am looking for. it looks like the audience for tables, results etc is no longer in poker chat. we'll see. Posted by aussie09
I agree keep it in its own section. I don't think the best player really gives room for a response. I'm sure, like me, most people read it but don't respond. Can't think of how to engage with it in terms of comments but i do like to read it
In Response to Re: *** Best Player *** POLL : I agree keep it in its own section. I don't think the best player really gives room for a response. I'm sure, like me, most people read it but don't respond. Can't think of how to engage with it in terms of comments but i do like to read it Posted by FeelGroggy
your too sincere groggs you,re entitled to brags once in a while sir,keep scooping
In Response to Re: *** Best Player *** POLL : He likes banging on about some provincial psuedo city that has a county just South of Scotland named after it. Other than a very small wall around it and a catchy tune about its Duke and a hill I don't see the attraction......but he definitely seems to like it. Posted by HENDRIK62
Poker results in Poker Chat. How it should be Much better than the drivel in players personnel self ego boosting diaries. I agree they all should be moved too. But the Forum cliche don't. There is even a Virtual Bar on here somewhere I have been told. Crikey. To get the forum really busy.....attract more drunk posts. They really liven things up. Cheers again for all the hard work you put into your Result page Rob. Ignore the haters/jealous folk. Posted by MAXALLY
My ego has been struggling of late as my results have been terrible, so to give my self an ego boost im going to restart my diary and tell everyone how terrible my results have been, i hope you enjoy it and maybe find someway to add to it. Hopefully doing this might stop the Drivel of players complaining regularly about things such as playing satelittes for cash, but than rather hyprocritically doing exactly that themselves.
Enough people are interested in the best player tables to keep them going.
On a couple of occasions lines have been crossed and withrdawn, otherwise carry on and keep in poker chat. As per the other poll we need fewer categories not more.
Maxally encouraging drunk posts? Calling other people haters? Coming from the person who made the worst drunk/hateful post I have ever seen on this forum?
To use another cliche - People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
Maxally encouraging drunk posts? Calling other people haters? Coming from the person who made the worst drunk/hateful post I have ever seen on this forum? To use another cliche - People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones Posted by Phantom66
nowt wrong with drunk posts imo. i didn,t see maxallys hateful post but if said drunk i,m sure he,d apologise next day obv
im drunk now don,t feel hate even tho i,ve had a frustrating night, people are different live and let live i say
i,ve seen alot of bad vibes towards max and wondered why i,ve met him seems like a decent lad no edge to him and very welcoming so i don,t get why max gets shitt but people have their own veiws,let it go folks
anyway, if i don,t win the mega im gonna kill my neighbours better put a winky
In Response to Re: *** Best Player *** POLL : nowt wrong with drunk posts imo. i didn,t see maxallys hateful post but if said drunk i,m sure he,d apologise next day obv im drunk now don,t feel hate even tho i,ve had a frustrating night, people are different live and let live i say i,ve seen alot of bad vibes towards max and wondered why i,ve met him seems like a decent lad no edge to him and very welcoming so i don,t get why max gets shitt but people have their own veiws,let it go folks anyway, if i don,t win the mega im gonna kill my neighbours better put a winky chill people have a good night Posted by stokefc
Wii this cheered me up . Its Friday and Stoke has posted gl in mega.
As for OP don't think anyone has any objections with posting your results as mentioned maybe keep it in one thread.
As for interaction I am not sure what you expect .They are results no debate no need to comment.
In Response to Re: *** Best Player *** POLL : nowt wrong with drunk posts imo. i didn,t see maxallys hateful post but if said drunk i,m sure he,d apologise next day obv im drunk now don,t feel hate even tho i,ve had a frustrating night, people are different live and let live i say i,ve seen alot of bad vibes towards max and wondered why i,ve met him seems like a decent lad no edge to him and very welcoming so i don,t get why max gets shitt but people have their own veiws,let it go folks anyway, if i don,t win the mega im gonna kill my neighbours better put a winky chill people have a good night Posted by stokefc
Love your drunk posts stoke. Keep them coming.
I think it's the "hateful" part not the "drunk" part that is the problem, although if an individual is prone to making hateful remarks when drunk perhaps they should leave the forum alone while drinking.
Put the posts in the tournament results thread if you like, they're fairly closely related.
The use of the phrase 'Best Player' is the only thing that doesn't sit quite right with me. 'Player with the best recent MTT results' isn't as catchy, but is more accurate.
Who is the 'best player' is something that is almost impossible to determine. For a start your system excludes everybody who specialises in cash and SnGs. Also everybody who doesn't play a high volume of the tournaments you report. That's probably at least 95%+ of the players on the site. Of the small group that are left we then have to ask who will be top of the table, the best player, or the player who has run hottest lately?
For example, I think I play OK, I'm nowhere near as good as the best obviously, but even if I go on a massive heater I've still got 0% chance of ever appearing on the list of the top 100 'best players'.
Put the posts in the tournament results thread if you like, they're fairly closely related. The use of the phrase 'Best Player' is the only thing that doesn't sit quite right with me. 'Player with the best recent MTT results' isn't as catchy, but is more accurate. Who is the 'best player' is something that is almost impossible to determine. For a start your system excludes everybody who specialises in cash and SnGs. Also everybody who doesn't play a high volume of the tournaments you report. That's probably at least 95%+ of the players on the site. Of the small group that are left we then have to ask who will be top of the table, the best player, or the player who has run hottest lately? For example, I think I play OK, I'm nowhere near as good as the best obviously, but even if I go on a massive heater I've still got 0% chance of ever appearing on the list of the top 100 'best players'. Posted by GaryQQQ
cheers gary.
what you do and what i do aren't really the same. similar. you do a fine job posting the results of the 5 or 6 biggest games. i look at player performance totals for the day, week, month, rolling 30 days and year. i do record final tables but have never looked to post full results. if soccer saturday is anything to go by, you are reporting today's results whereas i am producing the league tables and opta stats.
one of the four things i do is "Best Player". you are right with your point about qualifying the title. i think i do in all my posts and on the website. it is best player of those who play in any of the 20 biggest guaranteed tournaments on sky poker every day, or the 7,000 major tournaments each year.
you are right to question what constitutes best. to me there are several ways including highest returns (see hendon mob) or highest profit. you can debate whether it should be judged over just one game or thousands or a period of time. highest return or most profit is not my preference to determine best. a qualitative scoring system produces the most accurate idea of best player. it is all debatable and no one can ever be certain of producing an unequivocal best. nevertheless there are 8 best player leagues on my website under the "Best" tab and you can choose whichever one you feel is the best match.
then, the question of players who don't play in the biggest games. 23,519 players are included so far this year. i remember an uncle telling me that he is the best tennis player in the world. i have never seen him play, nor has he entered any competition but his point was that it was unfair to bestow greatness on someone when he had not been included. i disagree but he has a valid point.
you and i are not likely to be best player. but it is not impossible. to feature in the top 100 i need to do a number of things; firstly i need to play regularly and i need to win a couple of tournaments and a few cashes too. unlikely but possible.
I would like to see a rolling top 100 2016 best player table. I like the idea of 30 days as anyone who hits a eater can break into it - I even been in it over 50 days this year
Be nice to have a 2016 so far one too just to see where sitting on points
I would like to see a rolling top 100 2016 best player table. I like the idea of 30 days as anyone who hits a eater can break into it - I even been in it over 50 days this year Be nice to have a 2016 so far one too just to see where sitting on points Keep up good work Posted by Nuggy962
There is a 2016 one, look at best tab then gives you various best tables.
Comments
Feel free to add a comment. Good or bad. Suggestions welcome too.
Pot calling kettle black?
A diamond in the rough?
Every cloud has a silver lining?
The writings on the wall?
Cat got your tongue?
thanks maxy
yes, that's a good point. i used to do that. it is a recent change. i was deliberating which way is most useful. one thing is now clear is that neither format get any/many posts in response. this poll will give me the info i am looking for. it looks like the audience for tables, results etc is no longer in poker chat. we'll see.
My ego has been struggling of late as my results have been terrible, so to give my self an ego boost im going to restart my diary and tell everyone how terrible my results have been, i hope you enjoy it and maybe find someway to add to it.
Hopefully doing this might stop the Drivel of players complaining regularly about things such as playing satelittes for cash, but than rather hyprocritically doing exactly that themselves.
Enough people are interested in the best player tables to keep them going.
On a couple of occasions lines have been crossed and withrdawn, otherwise carry on and keep in poker chat. As per the other poll we need fewer categories not more.
To use another cliche - People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
Thanks all.
I would just do whatever suits you and is best / easiest for you, whether it be a separate thread every day, or updating same post.
I think it's the "hateful" part not the "drunk" part that is the problem, although if an individual is prone to making hateful remarks when drunk perhaps they should leave the forum alone while drinking.
The use of the phrase 'Best Player' is the only thing that doesn't sit quite right with me. 'Player with the best recent MTT results' isn't as catchy, but is more accurate.
Who is the 'best player' is something that is almost impossible to determine. For a start your system excludes everybody who specialises in cash and SnGs. Also everybody who doesn't play a high volume of the tournaments you report. That's probably at least 95%+ of the players on the site. Of the small group that are left we then have to ask who will be top of the table, the best player, or the player who has run hottest lately?
For example, I think I play OK, I'm nowhere near as good as the best obviously, but even if I go on a massive heater I've still got 0% chance of ever appearing on the list of the top 100 'best players'.
cheers gary.
what you do and what i do aren't really the same. similar. you do a fine job posting the results of the 5 or 6 biggest games. i look at player performance totals for the day, week, month, rolling 30 days and year. i do record final tables but have never looked to post full results. if soccer saturday is anything to go by, you are reporting today's results whereas i am producing the league tables and opta stats.
one of the four things i do is "Best Player". you are right with your point about qualifying the title. i think i do in all my posts and on the website. it is best player of those who play in any of the 20 biggest guaranteed tournaments on sky poker every day, or the 7,000 major tournaments each year.
you are right to question what constitutes best. to me there are several ways including highest returns (see hendon mob) or highest profit. you can debate whether it should be judged over just one game or thousands or a period of time. highest return or most profit is not my preference to determine best. a qualitative scoring system produces the most accurate idea of best player. it is all debatable and no one can ever be certain of producing an unequivocal best. nevertheless there are 8 best player leagues on my website under the "Best" tab and you can choose whichever one you feel is the best match.
then, the question of players who don't play in the biggest games. 23,519 players are included so far this year. i remember an uncle telling me that he is the best tennis player in the world. i have never seen him play, nor has he entered any competition but his point was that it was unfair to bestow greatness on someone when he had not been included. i disagree but he has a valid point.
you and i are not likely to be best player. but it is not impossible. to feature in the top 100 i need to do a number of things; firstly i need to play regularly and i need to win a couple of tournaments and a few cashes too. unlikely but possible.