Collusion detection

Phantom66

Just spotted a new option on a certain results site for "collusion detection".

Apparently it is only on Beta for gold members so I can't try it.

Has anyone had a go?

What do people think of the specific tool if they can try it?

What about the principle of having a tool anyone (with a subscription) can use?

On the one hand fighting collusion has to be good.

However, my worry here is that it will offer "false positives" and disgruntled players will complain to sites on the back of the results "confirming" their own suspicions and then all hell will break loose if the site doesn't agree.

Over a small sample bad play or inattentive play can look like collusion and just because people play on the same table alot it doesn't mean they collude.

Donttelmum

dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button

stuarty117

In Response to Re: Collusion detection:

dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
Posted by Donttelmum

Only if your not on his list

cpfc_2010

In Response to Re: Collusion detection:

dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
Posted by Donttelmum

Gold

Phantom66

In Response to Re: Collusion detection:

dialbi will be mashing that more than the fold button
Posted by Donttelmum

Post of the week, WP

EvilPingu

In Response to Re: Collusion detection:

In Response to Re: Collusion detection : Post of the week, WP
Posted by Phantom66

+1

kelly05

some one wake me up zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzIn Response to Collusion detection:

Just spotted a new option on a certain results site for "collusion detection". Apparently it is only on Beta for gold members so I can't try it. Has anyone had a go? What do people think of the specific tool if they can try it? What about the principle of having a tool anyone (with a subscription) can use? On the one hand fighting collusion has to be good. However, my worry here is that it will offer "false positives" and disgruntled players will complain to sites on the back of the results "confirming" their own suspicions and then all hell will break loose if the site doesn't agree. Over a small sample bad play or inattentive play can look like collusion and just because people play on the same table alot it doesn't mean they collude.
Posted by Phantom66

kelly05

some one wake me up zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzIn Response to Collusion detection:

Just spotted a new option on a certain results site for "collusion detection". Apparently it is only on Beta for gold members so I can't try it. Has anyone had a go? What do people think of the specific tool if they can try it? What about the principle of having a tool anyone (with a subscription) can use? On the one hand fighting collusion has to be good. However, my worry here is that it will offer "false positives" and disgruntled players will complain to sites on the back of the results "confirming" their own suspicions and then all hell will break loose if the site doesn't agree. Over a small sample bad play or inattentive play can look like collusion and just because people play on the same table alot it doesn't mean they collude.
Posted by Phantom66

Donttelmum

To kind guys.

MilitantG

In Response to Re: Collusion detection:

In Response to Re: Collusion detection : +1
Posted by EvilPingu

+2 LOL