You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?

edited June 2017 in Poker Chat
Rationale: Not many people would argue that the poker industry is experiencing a challenging period while sports betting and other forms of betting such as fantasy sports are faring quite well . It is perhaps then even more important these days for the poker vertical to display innovation and creativity to increase their market share, entice entirely new client bases and remain relevant in a competative market.

While the number of land based betting shops is in decline and expected to decline further due to upcoming mergers, the current UK 'Remote Sector Market Share' (which includes online operators such as Sky) and stands at 29%, should be expected to see significant growth. Maybe one small way to entice a few more of the 20+ million online betting accounts held by the UK populous over to Sky could be to combine small areas of the poker and betting verticals.

The idea: It is not entirely new but generally is overlooked and the idea not considered in enough depth.

How about having a SkyBet section for poker. Now that suggestion is usually made each year when members ask Sky to run a book on Sky team members at the WSOP. I don't think this has ever been done but that suggestion is just the 'tip of the iceberg'.

Betting could be offered on how Sky members do at the WSOP for sure but... Betting could be offered on so many other aspects and could have a multitude of benefits.

There could be books run on the nightly tourneys on Sky, even if it just started out with each night's 'main events' and the 'Sunday major'. It could be expanded further and odds could be offered on certain groups of players doing better than other groups (something akin to the fantasy sports betting maybe?); odds could be offered on the players to win the most nightly 'main events' or 'Sunday Majors' over a
month/year, which players would do best in tourneys, SNG's or cash games over the year, etc. The scope is as wide as the imagination.

It wouldn't need to stop there... Similar betting structures could be offered on live events, such as the WSOP, EPT or even the SPT.

The extra benefits: While poker betting would never overtake the likes of Football betting, it would help advertise the poker offerings here and drum up more interest in both the poker and betting verticals. I don't think many/any sites have explored this concept in much depth so there may also be room to steal a march on competitors. There could be room to attract a much more heterogeneous client base to both verticals and create a mini poker boom.

Once established, even if this idea only got a couple few hundred regular people betting each day and did not take off in a huge way, it would still be likely to generate a significantly amount of extra income for Sky. If it did take off then it could give the poker and betting scenes on Sky one hell of a boost. And another benefit is that most of the infrastrucure to implement this is already in place at Sky so there wouldn't be a huge outlay.


Comments

  • edited May 2017
    It would also pro-actively advertise the poker vertical to the betting community rather than it passively sitting on their menu bar.
  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    It would also pro-actively advertise the poker vertical to the betting community rather than it passively sitting on their menu bar.
    Posted by QUICKFEET
    Yes, a possible 'triple whammy' IMO. Free advertising for poker as you mention QF; more betting revenue & more poker revenue. All for using the existing features.
  • edited May 2017
    Has "vertical" become a noun now?
  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    Has "vertical" become a noun now?
    Posted by FCHD
    Always has been an adjective and a noun...

    noun
    1. 1.
      a vertical line or plane.
      "the columns incline several degrees away from the vertical"
    2.
    an upright structure.
    "we remodelled the opening with a simple lintel and unadorned verticals"

    Although in this context I assume we are using it as shorthand for "Vertical Market"


    Sports betting and Gaming is one market, and within it there are different niche markets poker, sports betting, slots, casino, bingo etc.

    One way for a betting and gaming provider to get more money out of its existing customers is to cross-promote between its vertical offerings.
  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section? : Always has been an adjective and a noun... noun 1 . a vertical line or plane. "the columns incline several degrees away from the vertical" 2 . an upright structure. "we remodelled the opening with a simple lintel and unadorned verticals" Although in this context I assume we are using it as shorthand for "Vertical Market" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_market Sports betting and Gaming is one market, and within it there are different niche markets poker, sports betting, slots, casino, bingo etc. One way for a betting and gaming provider to get more money out of its existing customers is to cross-promote between its vertical offerings.
    Posted by Phantom66
    Yup, that is the one.

    Thanks Phantom
  • edited May 2017
    Why would people go for this as opposed to pokershares?

    How much of an uptake would it need to justify the time it would take someone to compile the odds?
  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    Why would people go for this as opposed to pokershares?
    Posted by MattBates
    Pokershares isn't on Sky so obviously it doesn't benefit Sky.

    Sky have the betting and poker platforms/verticals (whatever people prefer) already in place and could therefore cross promote them.

    The existing Sky customer base who may not use/know of Pokershares would be a semi-captive audience.

    I guess also for some of the same reasons that people still stake poker players, rather than just virtually investing in them.

    It would add a personal touch to the games on Sky.


    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    How much of an uptake would it need to justify the time it would take someone to compile the odds?
    Posted by MattBates

    How much of an uptake would obviously depend on the cost of implementing it.

    I would have thought that it wouldn't need a massive uptake to be profitable though as the SkyBet and Sky Poker platforms already exist. Obviously Sky have an excellent team devising, implementing and running all manner of promos already so I wouldn't think this would be a big stretch.

    In reality I don't see how it would be much more costly than offering odds on any extra events that Sky might do anyway from time to time. Of course with the added benefit that it may encourage more players to the tables and more players to SkyBet.

    I mean it is just an idea but it seems to me at least to be one that could be fun, not too hard to implement and has pretty decent potential.

    P.S. I am pretty sure a decent odds compiler could throw a book that was profitable to Sky together for a range of different markets in no time. I also imagine Sky have these people in place already on the SkyBet platform/vertical.
  • edited May 2017

    I would have thought it pretty easy to set up a profitable book for the WSOP main event as the likelihood of a known top name winning is pretty small.

    More interesting to bet on would be stuff like...

    WSOP player of the tournament/most bracelets.

    Match betting on bracelet wins between the top pros

    How many orbits will Will Kassouff miss through penalties


  • edited May 2017
    this would be good
    would you be able to bet on yourself
    could you stick half your roll on mattbates finishing 2nd
    the odds would have to be long for even the pros to win a 300 runner ME

  • edited May 2017
    But any body betting on poker markets would i guess be current poker players who have a interest or knowledge in that market therfore not attracting new players to poker. Why would people bet on a poker market with out any knowledge of it .
    When most people bet i.e football, horse racing , golf its because they have a interest in that sport or they have a idea on what they are betting on . 

    For instance i would not bet on basketball just because they offer a market on it as i have no interest in basketball and i would not know who to bet on? therefore i would not want to get into that sport at all. 

    Imo the best way to attract gamblers to poker is simple, give them something for nothing to sucker them in then you have them. At the moment skybet offer £5 free bet for gambling £25 for a limited time say couple of months offer a £5 poker token also, spend £150+ on skybet get a £33 poker token. People do spend this type of money on gambling every week wants they start playing bounty hunter or a main event for a couple of months you might just sucker them in long term. But i guess skybet would say its not cost effective in the short term but long term it might just work?
  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    But any body betting on poker markets would i guess be current poker players who have a interest or knowledge in that market therfore not attracting new players to poker. Why would people bet on a poker market with out any knowledge of it . When most people bet i.e football, horse racing , golf its because they have a interest in that sport or they have a idea on what they are betting on .  For instance i would not bet on basketball just because they offer a market on it as i have no interest in basketball and i would not know who to bet on? therefore i would not want to get into that sport at all.  Imo the best way to attract gamblers to poker is simple, give them something for nothing to sucker them in then you have them. At the moment skybet offer £5 free bet for gambling £25 for a limited time say couple of months offer a £5 poker token also, spend £150+ on skybet get a £33 poker token. People do spend this type of money on gambling every week wants they start playing bounty hunter or a main event for a couple of months you might just sucker them in long term. But i guess skybet would say its not cost effective in the short term but long term it might just work?
    Posted by safc71

    Personally I disagree with this.

    Firstly the potential flow of poker customers to SkyBet...

    I know myself that I hardly ever use SkyBet. If I was able to bet on ;main event winners/final tablers; Sunday Major winners/final tablers; who would win most tourneys in a week/month/year; how Sky Team members would do; WSOP stuff; SPT stuff; how many times Haysies lawyer would sue Sky per week; etc etc... I know it would entice me to use SkyBet more. I am sure there must be similar others.

    Sure I could bet on some (not all) of that stuff elsewhere, but I don't tend to bother. If I could do it while I was on Sky, and where I had funds, I would be more likely to do so.

    Regarding SkyBet customers being enticed to either play or bet on poker...

    Everything isn't black and white. It isn't the case that all poker players do not use SkyBet and that all SkyBet customers don't play poker or know anything about it. I am sure there are thousands of SkyBet customers who won't really play poker much here at the moment but who have played poker before and might take more interest if betting on it is offered.

    Even besides that, a lot of people are prepared to bet on the strangest things. So I am sure a few with no prior knowledge would at least be prepared to punt a few quid on stuff related to poker every now and again.

  • edited May 2017
    More cross-selling would be tempting. Could have a last longer in the 2 events in Vegas, for example.

    Haysie's lawyer assures me that, despite the vile calumnies perpetrated by a man who goes under many pseudonyms such as "the Nefarious Nonagenarian", his client will only sue as a last resort. This is due to the unpleasant memories of being threatened with legal action with his then musical partner Mr Fantayzee in relation to the purported size and use of a certain Mr Wayne's appendage :)
  • edited May 2017
    I'd never heard of Pokershares - I've just looked it up and it sounds like an interesting concept though.

    I don't bet on Skybet these days, I find other bookmakers sites easier to use and I don't really want my poker bankroll confused with betting bankroll, so the common wallet is a negative for me. But then, I'm a real small ball operator in both poker and betting, so perhaps I'm not one of the target audience anyway.
  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section? : Personally I disagree with this. Firstly the potential flow of poker customers to SkyBet... I know myself that I hardly ever use SkyBet. If I was able to bet on ;main event winners/final tablers; Sunday Major winners/final tablers; who would win most tourneys in a week/month/year; how Sky Team members would do; WSOP stuff; SPT stuff; how many times Haysies lawyer would sue Sky per week; etc etc... I know it would entice me to use SkyBet more. I am sure there must be similar others. Sure I could bet on some (not all) of that stuff elsewhere, but I don't tend to bother. If I could do it while I was on Sky, and where I had funds, I would be more likely to do so. Regarding SkyBet customers being enticed to either play or bet on poker... Everything isn't black and white. It isn't the case that all poker players do not use SkyBet and that all SkyBet customers don't play poker or know anything about it. I am sure there are thousands of SkyBet customers who won't really play poker much here at the moment but who have played poker before and might take more interest if betting on it is offered. Even besides that, a lot of people are prepared to bet on the strangest things. So I am sure a few with no prior knowledge would at least be prepared to punt a few quid on stuff related to poker every now and again.
    Posted by markycash

    To be honest marky you may be right but i most admit after years of gambling in the betting shop then with skybet and other online betting sites i never gave poker a second thought,i have always enjoyed betting on football/horses alot more than poker and still do but the reason i wrote that post was because that's how i started playing poker a few years ago through getting a free poker token from skybet then i was lured in and found that i enjoyed a game for fun/chill out after work win or lose ( and its got to be pl08 the best poker game by far).
    So i guess what i'am saying is that that's how sky enticed me in and it worked i fell into the trap and people like your self benefit from this who take poker more serious and play a better game . GL at the tables and hope you win big in vegas Marky

  • edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section? : To be honest marky you may be right but i most admit after years of gambling in the betting shop then with skybet and other online betting sites i never gave poker a second thought,i have always enjoyed betting on football/horses alot more than poker and still do but the reason i wrote that post was because that's how i started playing poker a few years ago through getting a free poker token from skybet then i was lured in and found that i enjoyed a game for fun/chill out after work win or lose ( and its got to be pl08 the best poker game by far). So i guess what i'am saying is that that's how sky enticed me in and it worked i fell into the trap and people like your self benefit from this who take poker more serious and play a better game . GL at the tables and hope you win big in vegas Marky
    Posted by safc71
    I don't know you stack me plenty mate! :D We have a right few battles on the felt :) Always fun sharing a table with you though, win or lose.

    I know what you mean and it is all just an idea but I guess in the way you were enticed to poker... If a few punters were encouraged to have a flutter on the poker it might capture their interest and they may start playing more themselves.


    It just seems odd that you can bet on so many things on SkyBet but you cannot bet very much on poker, especially when they have a poker platform/vertical. Looks like a penalty kick to utilise the betting and poker platforms to support one another.

    It could also lead to some brilliant forum betting discussions if people got into the habit of backing their favourite players (or themselves) in the nightly main events/Sunday Majors/SPT/WSOP etc.

    P.S. Thanks for the run good wishes for Vegas! Hope you run great yourself mate, preferably not when I am at your table though lol.
  • edited June 2017
    There has been betting on WSOP before, I just dont think there is much of an uptake in it. I think some casual punters might bet small on it (which wont get the bookies that excited and means their time pricing it up isnt covered) and more shrewd punters have thought the odds were particularly bad so would rather bet within the poker community or just wouldnt bet on it.

    Whilst it does seem like a fun idea and might get some fun on the forum/chat going I cant see the uptake being good enough to make sky want to do it from a business point of view.

    You say about betting on people for main events on sky. How would players feel when they saw their odds? Do you not think sky runs a massive risk of insulting players in a very public way? Just imagine seeing you are 300/1 shot to win the main. Whilst players might know deep down they aren't the best, seeing it in a very public way could be upsetting.

    Another issue would be collusion, could easily get people who stand to win big if they FT main or win main etc doing a few dodgy deals to ensure they win.
  • edited June 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    There has been betting on WSOP before, I just dont think there is much of an uptake in it. I think some casual punters might bet small on it (which wont get the bookies that excited and means their time pricing it up isnt covered) and more shrewd punters have thought the odds were particularly bad so would rather bet within the poker community or just wouldnt bet on it. Whilst it does seem like a fun idea and might get some fun on the forum/chat going I cant see the uptake being good enough to make sky want to do it from a business point of view. You say about betting on people for main events on sky. How would players feel when they saw their odds? Do you not think sky runs a massive risk of insulting players in a very public way? Just imagine seeing you are 300/1 shot to win the main. Whilst players might know deep down they aren't the best, seeing it in a very public way could be upsetting. Another issue would be collusion, could easily get people who stand to win big if they FT main or win main etc doing a few dodgy deals to ensure they win.
    Posted by MattBates
    +1 to this.

    It's a fun idea, but I can see more negatives than positives with it
  • edited June 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    There has been betting on WSOP before, I just dont think there is much of an uptake in it. I think some casual punters might bet small on it (which wont get the bookies that excited and means their time pricing it up isnt covered) and more shrewd punters have thought the odds were particularly bad so would rather bet within the poker community or just wouldnt bet on it. Whilst it does seem like a fun idea and might get some fun on the forum/chat going I cant see the uptake being good enough to make sky want to do it from a business point of view. You say about betting on people for main events on sky. How would players feel when they saw their odds? Do you not think sky runs a massive risk of insulting players in a very public way? Just imagine seeing you are 300/1 shot to win the main. Whilst players might know deep down they aren't the best, seeing it in a very public way could be upsetting. Another issue would be collusion, could easily get people who stand to win big if they FT main or win main etc doing a few dodgy deals to ensure they win.
    Posted by MattBates
    Definitely some good points as usual from yourself Matt.

    Regarding how players would feel... I would say that (a) I imagine the odds would be over on SkyBet and not in glaring view of the regular poker community, i.e. I would presume the odds wouldn't be displayed in the poker lobby if such a thing were ever implemented. (b) There are so many sites that show you exactly how capable or otherwise a player is in existence already anyway. I know you can opt out of them but most people do not.

    Regarding possible collusion... This problem can exist in any betting arena. Obviously it would be silly to offer odds on players busting early as they could just make sure they bust early. Sensible precautions could prevent most of the problems you mention IMHO.

    The concerns are valid but if Sky liked the idea I doubt any of the problems are insurmountable.

    Again it is just an idea and the silence from Sky thus far suggests it might not be something they would be overly keen on. Personally I think with a 'can do' attitude there is actually a lot of potential in the idea, sure there are a few barriers but nothing that couldn't be overcome IMO.



  • edited June 2017
    My biggest concern would not be in game collusion as it would be hard to rig a main win and it would be pretty obvious if say 2 players were HU and then miraculously player A plays to let player B win and coincidentally there was significant money compared to the prizepool riding on player B.

    My main worry would be ringers, with good players either setting up new accounts and playing badly at low stakes, then getting into a main via satellite, or playing under the account of someone they know who is a much weaker player.

    Maybe there could be a rule whereby players had to have played a qualifying number of main events before they will get a price? 

    I am sure that there would be protection measures in place in any case, but I am equally sure someone would try and find "an angle" within or outwith the rules.
     
  • edited June 2017
    In Response to Re: SkyBet - A diverse poker betting section?:
    My biggest concern would not be in game collusion as it would be hard to rig a main win and it would be pretty obvious if say 2 players were HU and then miraculously player A plays to let player B win and coincidentally there was significant money compared to the prizepool riding on player B. My main worry would be ringers, with good players either setting up new accounts and playing badly at low stakes, then getting into a main via satellite, or playing under the account of someone they know who is a much weaker player. Maybe there could be a rule whereby players had to have played a qualifying number of main events before they will get a price?  I am sure that there would be protection measures in place in any case, but I am equally sure someone would try and find "an angle" within or outwith the rules.  
    Posted by Phantom66

    What a great idea already thought about the collusion but didn't think about the ringers using other peoples account i could ask Markycash,MattBates etc etc  to use my account at odds of 10,000/1 we could make a killing just don't tell sky . oops!

Sign In or Register to comment.