You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW

edited May 2010 in Poker Chat

When your playing live poker there are always debates that occur over the rules, please post those debates and what the correct rule is.  I was playing recently were the best hand was ace high, with the ace being the high card on the board.  The argument was that one player stated it was a split pot, and the other player pointed out that poker hands are made up by the best 5 cards....the argument went on for about 15 minutes....

You guys got any others

Comments

  • edited May 2010
    I have seen this in a couple of casino's and it has been different on both occasions...

    A player raises on the flop...1 guy folds...the person who raises then turns his cards over to show but doesn't realise there is another player to act?

    To my understanding the player can now only call bets/check on the turn and river, he cannot raise at all? Is this correct?
  • edited May 2010

    I'm afraid that, staggering as it may seem for such a big & money-based industry, Poker Rules are not "universal" in Live Poker yet, & they vary from Venue to Venue.

    But most Venues use either the TDA Rules, or base their rules on "Robert's Rules of Poker", both of which can easily accessed via Mr Google.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    I'm afraid that, staggering as it may seem for such a big & money-based industry, Poker Rules are not "universal" in Live Poker yet, & they vary from Venue to Venue. But most Venues use either the TDA Rules, or base their rules on "Robert's Rules of Poker", both of which can easily accessed via Mr Google.
    Posted by Tikay10
    Tikay, How are you ment to know before you start a game in a casino/card room what rules they are playing..it doesnt make sense to have to ask before you start then work out which rules apply and which dont in each tounrament..
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    I have seen this in a couple of casino's and it has been different on both occasions... A player raises on the flop...1 guy folds...the person who raises then turns his cards over to show but doesn't realise there is another player to act? To my understanding the player can now only call bets/check on the turn and river, he cannot raise at all? Is this correct?
    Posted by Ads2kuk
    If he has shown his cards then the other player would control the betting by either folding (as he already knows whether he is winning or not)or betting.  i believe as yousay the lad can then only call or fold....to me if you show your cards and someone else is still in the hand you shouldnt be allowed to bet and therefore have to fold to any bet...you should keep up with the game
  • edited May 2010
    I once got into a stupid row with the cardroom manager at the Grand Casino in Helsinki over a ridiculous ruling...

    In the early stages of a NLHE tournament, with blinds at 20/40, I look down at AKs and verbally announce, "Raise."  I then throw out the 40, while I decide how much to raise by.  I make it another 80.  But the dealer declares this a string bet - and rules that I have just called the big blind.

    I protest to the dealer, tournament director and cardroom manager - pointing out that I made a verbal declaration, so should be allowed to make the call and then raise in two separate motions.  I've done this in every other cardroom I've played in - from London to Las Vegas; from Paris to Prague.

    Although all the players at the table - and the dealer - heard me say the word "raise," the manager decides that chips must go into the pot in a single motion, regardless of any verbal declaration.

    I have yet to find another casino in the world where they have this peculiar rule.

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW : Tikay, How are you ment to know before you start a game in a casino/card room what rules they are playing..it doesnt make sense to have to ask before you start then work out which rules apply and which dont in each tounrament..
    Posted by burnanator
    I could not agree more!

    However.......the wholly toothless & frustratingly incompetent Gaming Commission do "insist" (but don't impose) that all Licensed Venues display a copy of the Poker Rules in the Cardroom. So if the Rules are not on display, ask the Cardroom Manager to display them, & if he refuses, well, go somewhere else.

    I play regularly in G-Luton, & the Rules there change from night to night! It's nothing short of ridiculous.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    I once got into a stupid row with the cardroom manager at the Grand Casino in Helsinki over a ridiculous ruling... In the early stages of a NLHE tournament, with blinds at 20/40, I look down at AKs and verbally announce, "Raise."  I then throw out the 40, while I decide how much to raise by.  I make it another 80.  But the dealer declares this a string bet - and rules that I have just called the big blind. I protest to the dealer, tournament director and cardroom manager - pointing out that I made a verbal declaration, so should be allowed to make the call and then raise in two separate motions.  I've done this in every other cardroom I've played in - from London to Las Vegas; from Paris to Prague. Although all the players at the table - and the dealer - heard me say the word "raise," the manager decides that chips must go into the pot in a single motion, regardless of any verbal declaration. I have yet to find another casino in the world where they have this peculiar rule.
    Posted by J-Hartigan
    Lol James, that's as crazy as it gets - almost.

    Gala Notts used to have a Rule in No Limit that you HAD to announce a Raise. So if you wanted to Raise All-In, & pushed your ENTIRE stack across the line, but said nothing, it went as a Call!

    And here's a right corker, which is still in use in Grosvenor properties as far as I know.....

    If you are next to act, & on the dwell, & the geezer BEHIND you, not realising you have cards, mucks his hand, then the next two players, in normal domino fashion, also both fold out of turn, MY hand is automatically void, & "killed" by the Dealer. So the innocent party - me - gets penalised - & the three guilty parties - who all mucked out of turn do not get penalised.

    Go figure.
  • edited May 2010
    Jame & Tikay,

    I've seen examples of both of those recently at DTD at Nottingham.

    I had a floor manager over rule a dealer with me as I declared verbally and  loud to the table 'Raise to 900' but made it in two movements (push out a stack of 500, then pick up a stack of 500 in 50's and remove 100 and placed next to the 500). The dealer declared I had strung bet, but my point was I can't string bet when I'd already declared the amount outloud. Fortunately the floor manager agreed with me and the raise stood.
  • edited May 2010

    Here is one I would like clarification on.

    I was playing at DTD the other w/end with a few others from Sky poker and this situation arose.
    In the hand before a player raised about 3 x the pot and then a player after him went all in. The original raiser went into the tank and then folded. The next hand he raised again about 4 x the pot and then declared that he would not be folding again. I looked down at AK suited and as I had the player well covered in chips pushed all in expecting the said call. However, after another long think, this player again folded. I did not think too much about it at the time but a 'regular' who was sat by me on the table said I should of asked for a ruling to see if his verbal statement meant he had to call my all in.

    Could I have some views on this please as I have very little 'live' experience and would like to hear what I should of done/what should of happened? If you have time, please can you comment aswell Tikay, thank you.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    Here is one I would like clarification on. I was playing at DTD the other w/end with a few others from Sky poker and this situation arose. In the hand before a player raised about 3 x the pot and then a player after him went all in. The original raiser went into the tank and then folded. The next hand he raised again about 4 x the pot and then declared that he would not be folding again. I looked down at AK suited and as I had the player well covered in chips pushed all in expecting the said call. However, after another long think, this player again folded. I did not think too much about it at the time but a 'regular' who was sat by me on the table said I should of asked for a ruling to see if his verbal statement meant he had to call my all in. Could I have some views on this please as I have very little 'live' experience and would like to hear what I should of done/what should of happened? If you have time, please can you comment aswell Tikay, thank you.
    Posted by MAXALLY
    His "call" before the flop was not binding. A call can only be binding after a bet or raise, since he said it BEFORE any action had taken place it is meaningless. 
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW : His "call" before the flop was not binding. A call can only be binding after a bet or raise, since he said it BEFORE any action had taken place it is meaningless. 
    Posted by BrownnDog
    Thank you Lewis, I wasn't sure.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    Here is one I would like clarification on. I was playing at DTD the other w/end with a few others from Sky poker and this situation arose. In the hand before a player raised about 3 x the pot and then a player after him went all in. The original raiser went into the tank and then folded. The next hand he raised again about 4 x the pot and then declared that he would not be folding again. I looked down at AK suited and as I had the player well covered in chips pushed all in expecting the said call. However, after another long think, this player again folded. I did not think too much about it at the time but a 'regular' who was sat by me on the table said I should of asked for a ruling to see if his verbal statement meant he had to call my all in. Could I have some views on this please as I have very little 'live' experience and would like to hear what I should of done/what should of happened? If you have time, please can you comment aswell Tikay, thank you.
    Posted by MAXALLY


    You can say what you want.


    A situation where an action was binding or 'could be' for example, if action is on me to check or bet and the next player to act slides out a bet, he gets told it's not on him however if I bet when it now gets to him the action is different and he gets to rechoose what to do, IF I CHECK however his bet goes in the pot automatically then everyone else acts and it's back on me.... this is important as it can give you a positional advantage as you see how everyone else reacts to his bet and can act accordingly.
  • edited May 2010
    some decent examples coming through..the more examples we discuss the more clarity we may gain..as for the guy saying he wouldnt fold, thats just table play, not binding in the least..as for the james's example, if you announce it, you have announced it...if the delaer is saying you have completed your bet with the first amount you put in you may as well raise all in and then change your mind and just put in say 100 chips...whats that you say dealer i raised all in, oh no dealer my bet is on the table ...lol
  • edited May 2010
    I was playing a live game last Monday night.

    The dealer forgot to move the button, so the big blinds and small blinds were the wrong players.

    I pointed this out to the dealer after everyone had their cards,  however as she was preparing to redeal and had mucked my cards, someone pointed out that the player UTG had raised,  action had taken place so the game had to continue

    The hand did continue,  except for me as she had mucked my hand.

    I was told I was out of the hand,  my own fault for not protecting my cards 

    I think this is all pretty much correct but it is still annoying ;o)

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    I was playing a live game last Monday night. The dealer forgot to move the button, so the big blinds and small blinds were the wrong players. I pointed this out to the dealer after everyone had their cards,  however as she was preparing to redeal and had mucked my cards, someone pointed out that the player UTG had raised,  action had taken place so the game had to continue The hand did continue,  except for me as she had mucked my hand. I was told I was out of the hand,  my own fault for not protecting my cards  I think this is all pretty much correct but it is still annoying ;o)
    Posted by JockBMW

    For me that is incorrect.

    Doesnt matter what action has taken place, all players for one have the wrong cards.  And someone will have paid the big blind twice.

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    I was playing a live game last Monday night. The dealer forgot to move the button, so the big blinds and small blinds were the wrong players. I pointed this out to the dealer after everyone had their cards,  however as she was preparing to redeal and had mucked my cards, someone pointed out that the player UTG had raised,  action had taken place so the game had to continue The hand did continue,  except for me as she had mucked my hand. I was told I was out of the hand,  my own fault for not protecting my cards  I think this is all pretty much correct but it is still annoying ;o)
    Posted by JockBMW
    Why would you be protecting your cards if there was going to be a misdeal? That's surely ridiculous, have to let them go some time!
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    I was playing a live game last Monday night. The dealer forgot to move the button, so the big blinds and small blinds were the wrong players. I pointed this out to the dealer after everyone had their cards,  however as she was preparing to redeal and had mucked my cards, someone pointed out that the player UTG had raised,  action had taken place so the game had to continue The hand did continue,  except for me as she had mucked my hand. I was told I was out of the hand,  my own fault for not protecting my cards  I think this is all pretty much correct but it is still annoying ;o)
    Posted by JockBMW
    Hi Jock.

    Once action has taken place - & it had, as UTG had raised - the hand must remain "live". notwithstanding other consequences. It is up to the Dealer, AND all players - including you - to point out such errors BEFORE it is too late. If you fail so to do, you pay the penalty. Tough, eh?

    Old school players in that spot, however, realising how unjust it would be in the quoted example, & preferring common-sense to a badly-applied Rule & Convention of poker, would all muck their hands, & move on. As a general rule, it's best not to contest pots where a rule anomoly is suspected, as it only leads to arguments & bad blood. And who needs that?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW : Lol James, that's as crazy as it gets - almost. Gala Notts used to have a Rule in No Limit that you HAD to announce a Raise. So if you wanted to Raise All-In, & pushed your ENTIRE stack across the line, but said nothing, it went as a Call! And here's a right corker, which is still in use in Grosvenor properties as far as I know..... If you are next to act, & on the dwell, & the geezer BEHIND you, not realising you have cards, mucks his hand, then the next two players, in normal domino fashion, also both fold out of turn, MY hand is automatically void, & "killed" by the Dealer. So the innocent party - me - gets penalised - & the three guilty parties - who all mucked out of turn do not get penalised. Go figure.
    Posted by Tikay10

    Is this for real or what ??, lol, thats insane.

    Tk, whith such a bizarre rule, you must have asked the reasoning behind it.  What is it ?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW:
    In Response to Re: THOSE POKER RULES YOU NEVER KNEW : Is this for real or what ??, lol, thats insane. Tk, whith such a bizarre rule, you must have asked the reasoning behind it.  What is it ?
    Posted by OMahonyO
    It seems bizarre, but in fact it's not, & that's because poker players know no bounds when it comes to ingenious ways to angle shoot.

    Were the Rule NOT in force, late position players could & would pull all sorts of stunts to manipulate situations. One of their hole cards may "disappear" - VOID HAND" he then shouts, or he claims one of any number of potential transgressions simply to find a way to kill the hand for his own spurious reasons. So the Rule of "once action has taken place, the hand stands" is actually very necessary, despite several negatives it confers on play. So players themselves have a duty to pay attention, because THEY have the power to stop play BEFORE action takes place.

    Imagine, to take it to the extreme, that a 2 way hand had reached Showdown, & Player A  realises he is about to get stacked. He suddenly shouts "ooh, it was a misdeal, Button was in the wrong place" or whatever. See the prob?

    Never underestimate the guile & cunning of poker players to manipulate a Rule or situation to their advantage, hence all these odd Rules. As a generality, moral scruples are abandoned in favour of financial gain, & thus Rules need to be framed to defend against such things.

    I think I already mentioned the truly extraordinary situation where, in the £750 Entry UK Open, because three players BEHIND me acted out of turn, before I had been able to act, MY hand was declared Void, & they escaped without penalty! No legal system on earth could condone the wholly innocent party being the only one to be penalised. But poker can, & does. And that's because poker players do their utmost to find ways to manipulate the Rules. Which is fine & dandy, until someone - say, an Online Cardroom - does it to THEM.......;

  • edited May 2010
    I believe that i've seen somewhere that there is a lobby of professional players trying to formulate a set of poker rules that can be implemented Europe wide. I'm prettty sure that the spokesman for this was Marcel Luske, although i may be confusing him with another. Lets hope that they can get this through!
  • edited May 2010
    recently in a self deal tourny :-

    i look down at king, just off final table when i need a double up... when

    - guy opposite me folded but his cards went to far and touched mine... i was told my hand was mucked.. when i called tournament director i was told it is my responsibility to protect my hand.. even tho i had a card protector over my cards, i had to muck my hand and lose my small blind
  • edited May 2010
    Thanks, but I still cant understand the particular situation you refer to.  Is it just a case of, if 3 ppl muck all out of turn , then the person who hasnt mucked must have been shooting some sort of angle to lead those players to believe he had mucked.  That cant be right.  Generally, I and prob others are waiting for the person to my right to act then I go next, so in theory, it could only be an oversight of one player, to make the whole table act out of turn.
    I can understand a misdeal having to be continued once action had taken place.
    Basically, why was your hand declared void.  Because 3 ppl mucked behind you?, why should that make your hand void. ?
  • edited May 2010
    Three quirky situations that stand out for me (including one of a 'manipulative' nature):

    During a particularly tense – and large – pot in a cash game (at the Grosvenor in Piccadilly), the dealer dealt the flop all the way to the river... all five cards at once. There was an American tourist in the hand, and he just went ballistic. The floor manager came over, as did security, and there was just a ton of foul language and uncalled for abuse. After 20 minutes or so, it finally got resolved. I can't remember how because I was utterly langered. But what I do remember, is that after the tourist had ripped into the dealer, the hand finally continued, only for the dealer to once again deal the turn and river together. It kicked off royally all over again, and resulted in the American making an accompanied exit amidst a fug of cuss words.

    When playing at Luton a while ago, the table seemed to be awash with eights. Every hand seemed to have them, including flopped quads, which sparked one regular off... he reckoned that he'd seen a hand dealt there once, with two eights on the flop. Not too spectacular in itself, until the players noticed they were both spades.

    Finally, I did one of the Bluff Boot camps last year, and remember Ian Frazer talking about an interesting heads up battle: They'd got to the river and he was just convinced the other guy held the nuts... but he still didn't want to let his hand go. He didn't want to put any more money into the pot to find out the bad news either. So eventually, as he was sat at the end of the oval, he pushed his entire stack along the right side of the table, keeping it within the line. The other guy took this as an all-in and flipped his cards over, showing the nuts. Ian looked at the dealer, the dealer shrugged, and Mr. Frazer took his chips back.
Sign In or Register to comment.