You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

SUNGLASSES

edited May 2010 in Poker Chat

From this week’s edition of ‘The Rail’…

“The sunglasses-at-the-poker-table debate has raised its head again, courtesy of Daniel Negreanu.

“In a recent blog, he revealed that players in the new US TV show ‘The Big Game’ are banned from wearing shades – a move he fully supports.

“In fact, he’d like to see the ban extended to ALL televised events.”

Daniel believes that no player should hide like a chicken behind sunglasses.  He thinks they’re bad for poker and that the game wouldn’t be on TV if everyone wore hoodies and sunglasses to hide their eyes.

Now, it’s time for you to have your say.  Please post your thoughts below and answer this question…


Comments

  • edited May 2010

    As this is a on line poker site, where do you stand on players wearing shades on here James?

    I obv have to, as it is, like Bono, a trademark!  :)
  • edited May 2010
    Great poll, and I agree with my Hero Dan the Man Negreanu that sunglasses should be banned!!
  • edited May 2010
    I don't mind either way, if people want to hide like a sissy girl thats up to them. I have tried wearing shades before because I get really bad headaches in long live games, but it didnt help so I stopped.
  • edited May 2010
    Depends how cool they look wearing them.


    Is it Greg Raymer who has them lizard ones?




    Anyway, I always wear my sunglasses while playing online.
  • edited May 2010
    I dont mind a if player is wearing sunglasses as long as they are mirror lenses and I get to see their cards! :)
  • edited May 2010
    I wear prescription sunglasses (sort of) - am I banned?

    If so, I might try the Alex Higgins' doctor's note method for wearing an open-neck shirt while playing snooker.

  • edited May 2010
    I think that anyone wearing sunglasses in a casino or card room (or anywhere indoors), should be systematically rounded up and garotted with cheese wire. If that sounds a little too dranconian, then I'm prepared to accept that their calf muscles get whipped with stinging nettles – but that's a minimum.

    On the other hand, I'm not particularly happy to endorse a a dictatorial society that enforces rulings upon the proletariat – especially if the offenders aren't really causing any harm. 

    For this reason, I have maintained my position as being totally useless to this forum, by (a) not voting, and (b) stating nothing of consequence.

    Perhaps we could reach a compromise, whereby all players must wear a monocle? Unless they don't want too.

    Vote for me at the next election, whenever that is.


  • edited May 2010
    you can count on my vote, you had me with the stinging nettle foreplay.
  • edited May 2010

    I clicked on this poll/thread fully intending to vote as I really thought I'd have a "polarised" standpoint on this issue.

    However, that masterful post by FlutNush has convinced me to stand firmly in the middle of this "spectacular" debate.

    Reminds me of a Society we once tried to get going at College ..... The Apathetic Society ..... but the turnouts just weren't quite good enough to warrent getting the tea and biscuits in.

    At the time we blamed an ill-advised font used in the posters.

    FlutNush you should definitely consider standing at the next election, particularly as I understand you can also opt to sit down during much of the process which can go on into the early hours.

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: SUNGLASSES:
    I think that anyone wearing sunglasses in a casino or card room (or anywhere indoors), should be systematically rounded up and garotted with cheese wire. If that sounds a little too dranconian, then I'm prepared to accept that their calf muscles get whipped with stinging nettles – but that's a minimum. On the other hand, I'm not particularly happy to endorse a a dictatorial society that enforces rulings upon the proletariat – especially if the offenders aren't really causing any harm.  For this reason, I have maintained my position as being totally useless to this forum, by (a) not voting, and (b) stating nothing of consequence. Perhaps we could reach a compromise, whereby all players must wear a monocle? Unless they don't want too. Vote for me at the next election, whenever that is.
    Posted by FlutNush
    I agree with everything you write/type/say FlutNush until i disagree with you in which case i won't, however until that day arrives or doesn't you'll do for me.
  • edited May 2010
    I don't wear shades at the table (mostly because i look like a tool in them) but i don't want to see them banned

    I can understand why Daniel would as he is SO good at reading people that this could be nothing but an advantage to him - Sometimes thought the shades make the man lol - Look at fossil man, those shade made him larger than life at the WSOP and not because people couldn't read him. They must of been quite intimidating to be starred down by lol
  • edited May 2010
    Nothing  wrong with wearing  dark or tinted glasses, as long as you can see your cards when you look down in a darkened casino  card-room .. ...

     Big  advantage is you can look at players  for tells with out them knowing your staring at them, also I don't know if I'd want to  be staring  at some big  hairy  lummox .. with tattooed forearms like Popeye's without my ' dark bin's' on  ..

    So for me it's  wear the Dark glasses to get all the help  you can at the tables, .....
  • edited May 2010
    Doesnt it adda  bit of spice to it though?

    i voted they should be banned, but on reflection, the likes of laak and raymer are diff to the others
  • edited May 2010
    Anybody who wears sunglasses indoors (apart from medical reasons) should be summarily executed!!

    That is all.

  • edited May 2010
    i wore a weilding mask once . got really hot mind. would this come under the ban????. suppose there would have to be a sub law covering things like big hats , scarfs, face packs, hockey masks and big bandages. phil x
  • edited May 2010
    Blimey... Gordon Brown's minced out in a huff and gone off to Her Madge for a pint of Darjeeling! 

    In an unprecedented step, Number 10 is currently vacant, and we are rudderless with no decided leader. Apparently, Nick Clegg upset Gordon by stating that his Mum did questionable things with a multitude of other chaps.

    Look, the long and the short of it is; I could catch a train over there now and nip in through the back door, then just claim squatters rights (I reckon it will take a year for them to get me out).

    So, stinging nettles are in, and we've got a hung vote on the whole sunglasses issue. Is there anything else we need addressing whilst I'm holding the reins?



     
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: SUNGLASSES:
    Blimey... Gordon Brown's minced out in a huff and gone off to Her Madge for a pint of Darjeeling!  In an unprecedented step, Number 10 is currently vacant, and we are rudderless with no decided leader. Apparently, Nick Clegg upset Gordon by stating that his Mum did questionable things with a multitude of other chaps. Look, the long and the short of it is; I could catch a train over there now and nip in through the back door, then just claim squatters rights (I reckon it will take a year for them to get me out). So, stinging nettles are in, and we've got a hung vote on the whole sunglasses issue. Is there anything else we need addressing whilst I'm holding the reins?  
    Posted by FlutNush
    lol ... wos the best  remedy for 'piles'   apart from not  sitting  on damp walls  like  me  mother used to  say,

    " Dont sit on that damp  wall, you'll get piles" !!!

    Another jem was,

    "If you fall out of that  tree and break  your  leg,    dont come  running to  me"   ?????
  • edited May 2010

    No..players should be allowed to wear shades if they want, Why not?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: SUNGLASSES:
    Blimey... Gordon Brown's minced out in a huff and gone off to Her Madge for a pint of Darjeeling!  In an unprecedented step, Number 10 is currently vacant, and we are rudderless with no decided leader. Apparently, Nick Clegg upset Gordon by stating that his Mum did questionable things with a multitude of other chaps. Look, the long and the short of it is; I could catch a train over there now and nip in through the back door, then just claim squatters rights (I reckon it will take a year for them to get me out). So, stinging nettles are in, and we've got a hung vote on the whole sunglasses issue. Is there anything else we need addressing whilst I'm holding the reins?  
    Posted by FlutNush

    I have a few envelopes, an invoice and package bound for Inverness that you may address, forcibly. If you wish to. Obviously.
  • edited May 2010
    Swimming goggles are the way forward.
  • edited May 2010
    Are Sunglasses not performance enhancing like steroids to an athlete?
  • edited May 2010
    just a quick note -

    Mohican, I have had to remove your post as the link broke the house rules. Nothing major to worry about, just a friendly note/reminder for the future.

    here is the article you referenced (copied and pasted below)

    Top of the Poker Pile: Phil Ivey is highly regarded amongst his poker peers

    In just five years Phil Ivey has gone from relative obscurity to poker god

     

    You don’t see many of the top poker players wearing shades.

    Ivey admits that Lindgren is currently a much better golfer but the way he says it leaves you with the feeling that you’d be a fool to back anyone but Ivey.

    He sounds like the hero in a summer blockbuster admitting the leading lady is currently someone else’s gal, but with the knowledge that come the final reel he’ll be the one rutting in a penthouse with fireworks exploding across a Manhattan skyline. ‘I predict that he won’t be able to play with me in two years,’ warns Ivey.

    It’s this confidence and intimidating talk which stands him in such good stead at the poker table. But this intimidation doesn’t come from hiding behind accessories.

    ‘I think that if you’re so uncomfortable with yourself that you have to wear shades maybe you shouldn’t be playing poker.’ There might be a touch of sour grapes about this – Ivey lost a $100,000 pot at a World Poker Tour event when a pair of sunglasses caused him to misread his hole cards.

    The $1,000 designer glasses soon found their way into the bin. Since then, Ivey’s had little time for sunglasses or the people that wear them. ‘You don’t see many of the top poker players wearing shades. If you come to my poker game at the Bellagio’ – he pauses to correct himself – ‘to the poker game, you won’t see any of them wearing sunnies. That’s saying something.

    Phil’s been playing at the highest level with the Bellagio big guns for two years now but it took him a while to get a handhold. ‘I wasn’t really nervous the first time, I was just eager to learn. I wanted to see why they were playing at that level and I wasn’t. I lost in that first session. Actually, I think I lost my first four or five sessions.’

    Regular guy

    Losing a few sit-downs at that level is going to damage your bankroll and Ivey was no different. But Phil recouped and rebuilt his funds and then sat back down with the big boys. He’s now as regular a fixture at the game as poker’s other top names, which include Chip Reese, Gus Hansen, Johnny Chan and Doyle Brunson. At a game where there’s $4,000-$8,000 action and a host of WSOP bracelet winners there’s not much room for self-doubt.

    Chan and Brunson between them hold 20 world titles. Ivey has averaged one a year but hasn’t played as many events as he could have, which is something that may change over the next couple of years. ‘I believe I could catch them if I really bear down and play at every WSOP tournament,’ he says. ‘It’s fun when you get down to the last few players and the countdown begins. I like the competition but I’m going to have to practice as I don’t feel that I’ve done as well as I should have. I want to get more experience so that when I’m deep down in a tournament I don’t make the same mistakes.’

    You’d think from the way that he’s talking he was new to the game. The focus and dedication is scary. But despite this does Ivey think that he’s the best player in the world? ‘I wouldn’t say there is a “best” player in the world. It’s whoever it is on that day. I feel that when I’m playing my best no one can beat me, but I don’t play my best all the time.’ It’s a line that doesn’t offer many crumbs of comfort. Even off his best Ivey is streets ahead of most mere mortals. Phil recouped and rebuilt his funds and sat back down with the big boys.

    Ivey is just one of a group of elite players who regularly shuffle up for the biggest game in town, found at the Bellagio casino in Las Vegas. It’s a home from home for the highest of high rollers, which is hardly surprising when the blinds are routinely set at $4,000 and $8,000. At this level millions of dollars can change hands in a single night. And regularly do. And the stakes can get even higher when the right kind of player is in town.

    As well as allowing the top pros in the world to play at the highest limits, The Big Game acts as a honey pot to pull in big money amateurs like Andy Beal. Amateurs that are more than happy to drop huge sums of money for a crack at poker’s biggest legends. Needless to say the likes of Ivey, Chan, Brunson and Negreanu aren’t complaining.

    IVEY’S TOP TIPS:

    1. Losing Streaks

    Accept that you’ll have losing streaks as well as winning streaks. Take each day individually and learn from what you’re doing. It’s all part of poker. If you’re feeling really frustrated, it’s time to quit. I tell a lot of players that they have to learn themselves about when to walk away. It’s one of the most important aspects to becoming successful at poker.

    2. Adapt

    You can’t let the same thing happen to you over and over again in poker. If you keep getting bullied off the pot then you have to start being the bully. If you’re bluffing too much then you must change your game. It’s hard to give advice to players that I don’t know because there’s more than one way to win at poker and everyone’s got their own style.

    3. Mental Stamina

    You have to fight the whole time you’re playing. It’s so important to be alert. You have to pay attention to what’s going on and understand your surroundings if you want to keep playing solid all through the night. You’re going to have ups and downs but when you’re playing long sessions the people you’re up against are playing long sessions too.

     

  • edited May 2010
    Nice Article Rich! Thanks x
  • edited May 2010
    i dont wear shade whn playing live myself,but i have no problem seeing others around the table.
  • edited May 2010


        Great thread James i voted to ban them i've not played many live games but the ones i have played there were no sunglasses at all.  For me Live Poker is about getting reads on people so lets get rid of the sunglasses  
  • edited May 2010
    some people might have to wear shades because they suffer from glare, would you ban these people too!

    If you are not good enough to read someone with glasses on then you shouldn't be playing/

    Thats my opinon.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: SUNGLASSES:
    just a quick note - Mohican, I have had to remove your post as the link broke the house rules 
    Posted by Sky_Rich
    No problems, had a suspicion that it would. I'll cut and paste it myself next time,was too lazy this time.

Sign In or Register to comment.