All Categories› Poker› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

What you talkin about?

loonytoonsloonytoons
edited August 2010 in Poker Chat

Sky Bet have opened a market on this.

spornybol - 1/2

OyNutter - 5/2

5/1 bar.

In the Mathematical Sub-Market, they go "No Offers" on MereNovice.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • loonytoonsloonytoons
    edited August 2010
    I was doing a crossword this morning and one of the clues was 'pereginate' which means to wander, and 'nankeen' which is a buff colour, i mean w t f! Who in the entire world would ever say 'im just going to pereginate over there in my nankeen trousers' where im from if you said that you would get a swift kick in the bolox lol. So i have come up with a competition : who can make up the most ridiculous sentence that no one would understand,(bandini your banned from entering lol) the winner will be the one who i think deserves a good good kick in the danglies lol.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CowgomooCowgomoo
    edited August 2010
    I vote Bryan oryan, and him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • theneonstheneons
    edited August 2010
    the next phone in guest on 865 who says 'Periginate' in a sentence should get a freeroll. that would be hilarious. like shearer in the 90s in that interview with all the movie quotes/titles. Whaddaya say?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IRISHROVERIRISHROVER
    edited August 2010

      A rumsfelds special kick in the danglies  speech on weapons of mass destruction in iraq


    		 There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. These are things we do not know we don’t know.  


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unknown_usernameunknown_username
    edited August 2010
    A couple of nice examples of gobbledygook here:

    ''Where the combined value of the above payments before actual assimilation remains greater than the combined value of the payments after assimilation, the former level of pay will be protected. These protection arrangements apply to the combined value of payments before and after assimilation, not to individual pay components, excepting the provision relating to retention of existing on-call arrangements.''
    (Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust, 2005)

    .......... or, are you sure you want a pay rise?



    "Oh, meltdown. It's one of those annoying buzzwords. We prefer to call it an unrequested fission surplus."
    (Charles Montgomery Burns in "Homer Defined," The Simpsons)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dud_ButiniDud_Butini
    edited August 2010
    Oh woe is me that I might be a sickly coloured sandal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • loonytoonsloonytoons
    edited August 2010
    The following won an award for talking gibberish,it is genuine and it was written by a professor in the university of Berkley USA for a journal publication, and to this day no one has a clue what she is 'talking' about lol. Any guesses anyone?The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oynutteroynutter
    edited August 2010

    Anent ubiquitous stoicism, opulent objurgation disseminates apropos phlegmatic progeny, are they bothered though?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bandinibandini
    edited August 2010
    England had a great World Cup.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    Anent ubiquitous stoicism, opulent objurgation disseminates apropos phlegmatic progeny, are they bothered though?
    Posted by oynutter
    whatus t'farkus hellious est all dat bullious shittious?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oynutteroynutter
    edited August 2010
    IT,S FLOPPIN TRUE I TELL YOU--FLOP SAKE!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kiwini4uKiwini4u
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    The following won an award for talking gibberish,it is genuine and it was written by a professor in the university of Berkley USA for a journal publication, and to this day no one has a clue what she is 'talking' about lol. Any guesses anyone? The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power
    Posted by loonytoons
    Good grief its simple, what she is saying is that you have to warm the pot before making the tea.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    IT,S FLOPPIN TRUE I TELL YOU--FLOP SAKE!
    Posted by oynutter
    ok,

    i have tried to undertand your sentence

    I have got something like...

    Everyone having a laugh and being virtuous, spreads a criticism of the rich which incidentally leads to sluggish people being born.

    am i close?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unknown_usernameunknown_username
    edited August 2010
    cant beat,‘When the seagulls follow the trawler, it’s because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea’ cantona legend!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oynutteroynutter
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about? : ok, i have tried to undertand your sentence I have got something like... Everyone having a laugh and being virtuous, spreads a criticism of the rich which incidentally leads to sluggish people being born. am i close?
    Posted by GREGHOGG
     quite a long way off there greg-- 7/10 for effort though
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • spornybolspornybol
    edited August 2010
    willis
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oynutteroynutter
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about? : ok, i have tried to undertand your sentence I have got something like... Everyone having a laugh and being virtuous, spreads a criticism of the rich which incidentally leads to sluggish people being born. am i close?
    Posted by GREGHOGG
    go on Greg--one more guess and I'll tell ya
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about? : go on Greg--one more guess and I'll tell ya
    Posted by oynutter
    sorry, no more guesses, i spent 10 mins on google before, that was enough for me...

    I aint got the foggiest, you win!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • loonytoonsloonytoons
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    England had a great World Cup.
    Posted by bandini
    Love it! you talking about 1966? lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oynutteroynutter
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about? : sorry, no more guesses, i spent 10 mins on google before, that was enough for me... I aint got the foggiest, you win!
    Posted by GREGHOGG
     ok Greg-- revised to 9/10 for effort--it means-- concerning universal apathy, much blame is directed toward lethargic youth, but they aint bothered
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG
    edited August 2010
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about?:
    In Response to Re: What you talkin about? :  ok Greg-- revised to 9/10 for for effort--it means-- concerning universal apathy, much blame is directed toward lethargic youth, but they aint bothered
    Posted by oynutter
    brilliant, n1, ty
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.