You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Orfordable league RD 5 Standings

edited August 2009 in Poker Chat
Hi All

 A very good turnout last night with 105 runners for the £3 deepstack. Winner was zxghostxz with 2nd place coming from kennybad

Well done all, and after yet another final table, phil has now taken the lead in the league even though he has played 1 less games than the other top runners... Needless to say, he is currently winning on average, with the league running by average after Sundays game (minimum of 3 games played) so get those games in. <td class="xl64" style="border-bottom:#ece9d8;border-left:#ece9d8;background-color:transparent;font-family:Calibri;color:black;font-size:11pt;border-top:#c0504d 0.5pt solid;font-weight:700;border-right:#ece9d8;text-decoration:none;tex
POSITIONPLAYERPOINTSGAMES PLAYED
1stPHIL12UK3164
2ndFLASHFLUSH3115
3rdCORBETT043035
4thMADMOO3025
5thGREGHOGG2964
6thCHOPS772734
7thSOLACK2495
8thOZZIE082365
9thKIWINI4U2294
10thPILLOWMAN2233
11thZXGHOSTXZ2222
12thMERENOVICE2215
13thSHY-BOY2204
14thHUCK_NALL2174
15thTIKAY2074
16thDELTA2035
17thSOLIDSTAN12024
18thOYNUTTER1993
19thMRDICKIE1983
20thNCOLLEY1944
21stANTZ5751933
22ndJOYCE11864
23rdCARPENTER1782
24thDRAIG1784
25thBADBOY9851722
26thMMMCHIPS1602
27thJAMO11582
28thDTWBANDIT1573
29thMICKYBLUE1553
30thROBBO671522
31stVALIS1523
32ndMAZERAIDER1503
33rdBANDICOOT1433
34thTALLBOY1413
35thANNIE_DUKE1332
36thBARSTOOL221322
37thSOLARCARRO1273
38thSCRUMDOWN1253
39thLETTICEK1212
40thLIZZARD711212
41stSIMALLY1194
42ndATOMANT551185
43rdREEVY991124
44thKENNYBAD1091
45thBUDGIRL1073
47thRIVERKK71061
46th2471062
48thXAVI661051
50thBARTONBR121041
49thMR_MBRO1043
51stMCRATMAN
«1

Comments

  • edited August 2009
    Hi Charles,

    Thanks very much for taking the time to update this every day, it is much appreciated.

    Phil is top on average and deservedly so. Last nights was another corker, and with 16 left, i was sitting pretty with 10x BB. I was on Phil's left, and he shoved before me in early position and i had him covered (just)
     
    I thought ho hum, lets GO GO GO, looking down at my JJ.  Phil had AK, as i had suspected, and he won this crucial race. Next time it may be a different story, but my thinking was knock Phil out and i go top!
     
    As this league heats up with more players in the mix and chopping and changing of positions it will be exciting and there will be more decisions based on laddering against players who a threat to your league position, or who you are chasing. This will be especially exciting near the end!

    Hope everyone is enjoying this, i certainly am:)

    Thanks again

    Greg
  • edited August 2009
    Really enjoyed the game last  night(except for the 'blip' on the bubble).  Standard was good and as usual the chat was excellent.  Good to have a large numbered tourney.
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    Hi Charles, Thanks very much for taking the time to update this every day, it is appreciated.  Hope everyone is enjoying this, i certainly am:) Thanks again Greg
    Posted by GREGHOGG
    My sentiments as well.
    It might be an idea just to publish the top 100 or so, because that list is going to get bigger and bigger!
    Well done though.
  • edited August 2009
    hi flash , im another one who is gratefull for the effort you put in . and i agree with greg ,this new league is fun. like to add ,that the behaviour of  the players on the tables has overall been excellent.
  • edited August 2009
    Thanks Charlie for doing this. Everyone appreciates it. Hopefully next time I won't be moved so you can make that bluff on me ;)

    Once the Avg starts kicking in on Sunday I assume you are only going to show those in the table that have 3 games minimum. As Huck' said above, then move to publishing top 100.(if ppl outside of this want to know their positions, they can just ask you on the private PM coming next week?)
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    Thanks Charlie for doing this. Everyone appreciates it. Hopefully next time I won't be moved so you can make that bluff on me ;) Once the Avg starts kicking in on Sunday I assume you are only going to show those in the table that have 3 games minimum. As Huck' said above, then move to publishing top 100.(if ppl outside of this want to know their positions, they can just ask you on the private PM coming next week?)
    Posted by Grimstar30
    Exactly what i was going to say to you mr Huck ... I know otherwise im going to get ppl forever saying.. how many points did i get for this round etc etc... so if i just keep it running total (the last 1 will be tonight) then when i post Sundays results (which might not be till Monday evening as im out and then obviously as work) it will be on average with minimum 3 games played, where atm there is only looking to be around 50 players who qualify.
  • edited August 2009
    WOOHOO! 

    226th! Room for improvement me thinks ;-)

    Brilliant job, Charlie. Thanks for your efforts.

  • edited August 2009
    Just a point Charles - I'm not sure how you are planning the average - BUT - if the better players only played the low buy in events where there are more runners, they are bound to get a higher average.
    I wouldn't want the higher buy ins to suffer as a result of the league.
  • edited August 2009
    That is the only problem with the league!! I will be purely dividing the points by games played... If you have a suggestion then that would be great because this is the bit im stumped on... Im hoping as the league progresses more players will move up so we can have a level field in all buyins, lets see waht tonight produces, as last nights £3 buyin had 105 and the last £11 only had 39 :(... ne suggestions please speak up
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    That is the only problem with the league!! I will be purely dividing the points by games played... If you have a suggestion then that would be great because this is the bit im stumped on... Im hoping as the league progresses more players will move up so we can have a level field in all buyins, lets see waht tonight produces, as last nights £3 buyin had 105 and the last £11 only had 39 :(... ne suggestions please speak up
    Posted by FlashFlush
     I'll think about it Charles.
  • edited August 2009

    As it is only a bit of fun, it is probably better not to overcomplicate everything.

    However, if there had been money at stake, then the only fair way would be to have separate leagues based on buy in.
    If you get time, it might be worth just conducting a one off experiment just to see how much this affects the league standings.
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    That is the only problem with the league!! I will be purely dividing the points by games played... If you have a suggestion then that would be great because this is the bit im stumped on... Im hoping as the league progresses more players will move up so we can have a level field in all buyins, lets see waht tonight produces, as last nights £3 buyin had 105 and the last £11 only had 39 :(... ne suggestions please speak up
    Posted by FlashFlush
    Would it work if you only awarded points to say the top 40 or 50 players in each game?

    I forgot to add my thanks for running this league.
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings : Would it work if you only awarded points to say the top 40 or 50 players in each game? I forgot to add my thanks for running this league.
    Posted by Kiwini4u
    Good idea Kiwi and simple!
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings : Would it work if you only awarded points to say the top 40 or 50 players in each game? I forgot to add my thanks for running this league.
    Posted by Kiwini4u
    Could be a good shout... makes it easier for people in the bigger buyins though, then the players that can only afford the £3 buyins have to beat up to 60 players just to get in the points
  • edited August 2009
    Flash whatever is decided its just a bit of fun. The league is a great idea, thought i might have moved up a little higher after my 3rd place finish last night in the £22 deepstack. Keep up the good work and well played last night.
    Also well done to Huck_nall nice catch with the K3 off mate!
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    Flash whatever is decided its just a bit of fun. The league is a great idea, thought i might have moved up a little higher after my 3rd place finish last night in the £22 deepstack. Keep up the good work and well played last night. Also well done to Huck_nall nice catch with the K3 off mate!
    Posted by tallboy
    It's only the 7pm deepies that count mate. No other deepstack game is counted in the points.
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    Flash whatever is decided its just a bit of fun. The league is a great idea, thought i might have moved up a little higher after my 3rd place finish last night in the £22 deepstack. Keep up the good work and well played last night. Also well done to Huck_nall nice catch with the K3 off mate!
    Posted by tallboy
    Well done.... i think you only had bout 30 points for somthig b4, so you have moed up loads.... another big cash and ull be right up there :D
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings : Well done.... i think you only had bout 30 points for somthig b4, so you have moed up loads.... another big cash and ull be right up there :D
    Posted by FlashFlush
    sorry didnt notice u said £22 deep... yes only 7pm trnys
  • edited August 2009
    Thats typical of me i never listen cheers lads!!
  • edited August 2009
    i think u just need to stick to the averages no need to over-complicate things for a bit of fun  lol
  • edited August 2009
    Yes i agree, keep it SIMPLES:)


  • edited August 2009

    I agree about keeping it simple, but I've had an idea so will post it.

    unless of course you adopt something like this kind of system (e.g based on say 107 runners)

    1 point for runners finishing 100+
    2 points for 90-99
    3 points for 80 -89
    .....
    ....
    ....

    ect, then the bonus points for cashing, top 3 and winner?

    or change the points every 5 places.

    This would be more complicated and time consuming however but it is just a thought and would reduce the massive amount of points available in the larger fields.

  • edited August 2009
    NICE WORK AGAIN FLASH. WAS AT YOUR TABLE IN THE ORFORDABLE  AS WERE AT TIMES NUMBERS 70 & 81 IN YOUR LEAGUE . I COME UP AGAINST THEM REGULARLY IN £2 DEEPIES NUMBER 81 GUY CONSTANTLY TALKS CR*P HE CAN GO FOR 3 HOURS NON STOP. HE IS IMPOSSIBLE TO REASON WITH AS YOU TRIED TO LAST NIGHT IVE FOUND THE BEST IDEA IS JUST TO IGNORE HIM. BUT AS HE THINKS WERE ALL LUCKERS AND FISH AND WONT BE PLAYING 10 SEATERS AND OR SKYPOKER ANYMORE WE MAY NOT BENIFIT FROM HIS COMPANY OR WORDS OF WISDOM ANYMORE.
    KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK M8 PROBABLY SEE YOU IN THE SUNDAY DEEPIE.
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    NICE WORK AGAIN FLASH. WAS AT YOUR TABLE IN THE ORFORDABLE  AS WERE AT TIMES NUMBERS 70 & 81 IN YOUR LEAGUE . I COME UP AGAINST THEM REGULARLY IN £2 DEEPIES NUMBER 81 GUY CONSTANTLY TALKS CR*P HE CAN GO FOR 3 HOURS NON STOP. HE IS IMPOSSIBLE TO REASON WITH AS YOU TRIED TO LAST NIGHT IVE FOUND THE BEST IDEA IS JUST TO IGNORE HIM. BUT AS HE THINKS WERE ALL LUCKERS AND FISH AND WONT BE PLAYING 10 SEATERS AND OR SKYPOKER ANYMORE WE MAY NOT BENIFIT FROM HIS COMPANY OR WORDS OF WISDOM ANYMORE. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK M8 PROBABLY SEE YOU IN THE SUNDAY DEEPIE.
    Posted by BADBOY985
    I have to agree, I've had a similar problem and found myself going on tilt due to their banal drivel. Anyone know if there is a way to turn off the chat just for one player?
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    Keep up the good work and well played last night. Also well done to Huck_nall nice catch with the K3 off mate!
    Posted by tallboy
    You mean this hand m8. I thought I played it well. lol
    SoLack Small blind  2000.00 2000.00 81091.25
    tallboy Big blind  4000.00 6000.00 21648.75
      Your hole cards
    • K
    • 3
         
    Huck_Nall All-in  31260.00 37260.00 0.00
    SoLack Call  29260.00 66520.00 51831.25
    tallboy Fold     
    Flop
       
    • 9
    • 6
    • 5
         
    Turn
       
    • 3
         
    River
       
    • 3
         
    SoLack Show
    • Q
    • Q
       
    Huck_Nall Show
    • K
    • 3
       
    Huck_Nall Win Three 3s 66520.00  66520.00
  • edited August 2009
    haha Huck-Nall you runnner runner fish you ;)

    I actually got double figures in terms of points last night yayyyyyy


  • edited August 2009
    Right then guys lets get in tonights deepstack... £11 buyin will be a good prizepool, and more than likely over £100 to the winner (i think the last £11 buyin was over £200 to winner) More people entering it the more points up for grabs... See you there!!!
  • edited August 2009
    as the £10 deepstack does not get enuf ppl in why dont sky make every 1 a £5 buyin that way we should get a good field everytime ie 2x10 3x5 2x3 =£41 7x5=£35 only a thought.
  • edited August 2009
    Just makes it more open to different people, the £10 is nice for the higher staked players, but the £3 is good for the people who dont have the BR to play higher than that level
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to Re: Orfordable league RD 5 Standings:
    as the £10 deepstack does not get enuf ppl in why dont sky make every 1 a £5 buyin that way we should get a good field everytime ie 2x10 3x5 2x3 =£41 7x5=£35 only a thought.
    Posted by DELTA
    Its a nice thought, but I was under the impression that the different level of buy ins were supposed to attract players of a different standard each night leading up to the £100.00 games on a Sunday for the real top players.
Sign In or Register to comment.