You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

What was wrong with my thinking?

edited September 2009 in Hold'em Poker Strategy
1st hand in a MTT. The guy UTG raises 2BB.
Call
Call
Button (me) call with 55
SB call
BB call

Flop = K52 rainbow

UTG goes all-in

Now it's folded round to me and I think there is just no way he's got 3 kings. 99% of people would either check or make a min bet in that position. Going all-in is madness isn't it? What are you going to get called by?

Convinced I've got this nailed, I call.

Villain flops over KK and I'm gone.

Now this wasn't just a hand of cards, it was a game of people. I completely misjudged my opponent. Should the fact that I had no information on him have made me fold? I don't believe that I was just unlucky, I had exactly the hand the villain wanted me to have; you could say that he played me like a banjo.

What was wrong with my analysis, because it was clearly wrong?

Comments

  • edited August 2009

    Wow, villain just got super lucky you hit that flop square in the face.

    His all in play was just mind bogglingly speculative, no sense really in it at all.

    So IMO, there was nothing wrong in your call, or as you put it, your "analysis", as there was nothing to analyse.

    However that hand was played after the flop, there was a very high chance all the money would have ended up in the middle anyway, it just so happened that the villain played it in the most non-sensical way to do so.


  • edited August 2009
    Nothing you can do, I would call all day. If you fold that long term it would be a losing play. It is just a good old cold deck I am afraid. The only time I might possibly fold this hand is if it was like the 1st hand of the world series like in a long structured event. You did nothing wrong at all, strange play by your opponent but on this occasion hes gonna get paid by anyone with your hand.
  • edited August 2009
    lol, bet ur face was a picture when he flipped KK, I would have been well shocked. ul
  • edited August 2009
    Hi
    To be honest if you fold  a set of 5s in this situation, you will NEVER play any hand.
    What is it you wanted on the flop. The only hand that was beating you was KK but the way the betting went i dont think you could see that hand.
    That player could have been making a move with a pair like 10s,Js,Qs or aces.
    Unfortunatly you both hit a dream flop, just a bit of a cooler mate.

    col
  • edited August 2009
    In Response to What was wrong with my thinking?:
    1st hand in a MTT. The guy UTG raises 2BB. Call Call Button (me) call with 55 SB call BB call Flop = K52 rainbow UTG goes all-in Now it's folded round to me and I think there is just no way he's got 3 kings. 99% of people would either check or make a min bet in that position. Going all-in is madness isn't it? What are you going to get called by? Convinced I've got this nailed, I call. Villain flops over KK and I'm gone. Now this wasn't just a hand of cards, it was a game of people. I completely misjudged my opponent. Should the fact that I had no information on him have made me fold? I don't believe that I was just unlucky, I had exactly the hand the villain wanted me to have; you could say that he played me like a banjo. What was wrong with my analysis, because it was clearly wrong?
    Posted by BigBluster
    I have noticed frequently that in early stages of tournaments, the 'all-in' ploy with the nuts in becoming a fashionable play these days.
    I think it wholly depends on the blind structure and you only have look at the number of double ups in 'The Open' every night in the first 5 minutes to see how frequent these plays are!

    However, you can never fold and 'c'est la vie'!
  • edited August 2009
    Oui, c'est la vie. C'est le poker.

    Absolutely nothing you can do.

    A remarkable play by the KK but, with 5 pf callers, I guess he thought that he might get a loose call from someone who thought that he was just a "nutter". If the board hadn't been rainbow, I might have done something similar. The chances of someone having a straight draw look pretty slim too.

    I once played a game where three of us flopped a set and all of us got it in on the flop. I had the middle set and made runner, runner flush!


  • edited August 2009
    There is no thinking needed op snap call

    No one is folding here.
  • edited August 2009
    analysis perfect
    i would have been thinking he was one of those nutters who ALWAYS goes all-in first hand of a tourney to show hes the BIG BALLS at the table... and would have raised him my watch also!
    nevermind mate it happens, he wont have the better of u in the long run
  • edited August 2009
    If this was me I'd be fist pumping before calling.

    Your almost NEVER beat there, except this time.
  • edited August 2009
    Lol can't believe this was read out in the poker stratergy bit of last nights show.

    Phil Ivey is calling here!
  • edited August 2009
    I've seen this play a few times lately and been on the wrong end of it more than once.  Its a tricky one cos as everyone is saying, you're never folding here, and neither would I.

    I think the thing is, depending on what game this occurs in - if its one of the lower buy in 'donkfests' as I've seen them called his play is actually a profitable one.  There are a lot of players using this site that have watched too much tv/too many films and think every play is a bluff and will literally call anything (with anything!), so in terms of his ridiculous overbet I may be able to see where he's coming from.  You were just unlucky :/
  • edited August 2009

    Ouch! 

    Villain was probably very inexperienced and went into OMG I GOT TEH NUTZ MUST BET ALLLLL MY CHIPZ TO WIN MORE....................

    Or Villain may have been a thinker and took the chance that with 5 PF callers, there was a pretty good chance 1 or 2 were set mining with low pp's.  With a 5 and 2 on board, he may have assessed it a good possibility that some one hit.  So by shoving he's repping an Kx type hand and any one with a set is insta calling all day.  As repton says, you see this play a lot in the early stages of low buyin MTTs and perhaps some of the better players are cashing in on this trait by making the 'bluffing with the nuts' play.

    However.............. I think explanation one is the more likely.

    FWIW...............I go busto here every time with 55

  • edited September 2009
    There's nothing wrong with your thinking whatsoever. The more interesting question is why did the guy open shove into a put with:

    a) the nuts,
    b) a dry board?

    Crazy stuff and a good way to lose value from those monster hands. You have to call, of course, but he's basically never getting called there unless you have AK/55/22 - to narrow down the range of hands that's going to pay him off is... interesting.
  • edited September 2009
    Crazy stuff and a good way to lose value from those monster hands. You have to call, of course, but he's basically never getting called there unless you have AK/55/22 - to narrow down the range of hands that's going to pay him off is... interesting.

    Actuallly I think that the villians play widens the calling ranges of his opponents.

    And mega lol at the people suggesting that he had polarised his opponents ranges to 55/22.

    FWIW I think the the villians play isn't that bad, in certain tournies/vs certain opponents that bet will get called so light.

    But the important thing to take from this hand is that never, ever, ever question a hand when you get it in with flopped 2nd nuts vs flopped nuts.  Its so unlikely that you just need to such it up, say nh and move on.
  • edited September 2009

    Scotty,

    How light do you think he's calling there then, just out of interest? Good to see we agree that we can't pass the second nuts at least ;)

  • edited September 2009
    Bluster i know by comments you have made you know your stuff... Im sure you know yourself this deck was cooler than the arctic cirlce. No way you are folding 2nd set on a rainbow flop with no straight... Its going to happen, ul but next time you make that call your ahead
  • edited September 2009
    In Response to Re: What was wrong with my thinking?:
    Scotty, How light do you think he's calling there then, just out of interest? Good to see we agree that we can't pass the second nuts at least ;)
    Posted by Sky_Dave
    I don't think that a K folds there to his bet.  Any pair between 5s and Ks will sometimes call too.

    I think a lot depends on the tournie tho, for instance in a freeroll I wouldn't be surprised to see that bet called down by A-high...in a standard MTT tho the range does tighten but I dont think it tightens so much that the KKK is ONLY getting called by 555/222.

  • edited September 2009
    In Response to What was wrong with my thinking?:
    1st hand in a MTT. The guy UTG raises 2BB. Call Call Button (me) call with 55 SB call BB call Flop = K52 rainbow UTG goes all-in Now it's folded round to me and I think there is just no way he's got 3 kings. 99% of people would either check or make a min bet in that position. Going all-in is madness isn't it? What are you going to get called by? Convinced I've got this nailed, I call. Villain flops over KK and I'm gone. Now this wasn't just a hand of cards, it was a game of people. I completely misjudged my opponent. Should the fact that I had no information on him have made me fold? I don't believe that I was just unlucky, I had exactly the hand the villain wanted me to have; you could say that he played me like a banjo. What was wrong with my analysis, because it was clearly wrong?
    Posted by BigBluster
    your thinking is out because your analising starts after the flop, u should have raised preflop which would most likely have utg  go all in giving u your chance to fold, second mistake,  you assumed you could be the only one with trips, he made it look like a desparate all in with a pair  a favourite play of mine, its not as uncommon a play as you think.
  • edited September 2009
    Have to disagree, Topchippy. I'm not raising with Pocket 5s, im calling a small raise to flop a set. The flop comes and ive hit my set.
    The 2BB raise and then the all-in on the flop disguises the top set; only someone seeing the cards can put down 555. I'd call the all-in till the cows come home/all day/any other same-meaning cliche.
    Just a cold deck; sometimes 'stuff' happens. You dust off, add it to your list of poker stories, and go on to the next comp.
  • edited September 2009
    In Response to Re: What was wrong with my thinking?:
    Have to disagree, Topchippy. I'm not raising with Pocket 5s, im calling a small raise to flop a set. The flop comes and ive hit my set. The 2BB raise and then the all-in on the flop disguises the top set; only someone seeing the cards can put down 555. I'd call the all-in till the cows come home/all day/any other same-meaning cliche. Just a cold deck; sometimes 'stuff' happens. You dust off, add it to your list of poker stories, and go on to the next comp.
    Posted by jayjaydee
    Exactly.
  • edited September 2009
    imo-with the whole table in on the flop--and with him being utg---his thinking is good---he thinks--im not getting outdrawn with this one!--someone may call--i only want one caller here---flop it--ALL IN!---that dos'nt mean you made a bad call--you had no history here--you had'nt had time to see how he plays--you had to call--wp--this was the gamble he was taking--that someone had a hand they should call with---he was lucky someone did--hard luck that it was you---both played well
  • edited September 2009
    In Response to Re: What was wrong with my thinking?:
    Bluster i know by comments you have made you know your stuff... Im sure you know yourself this deck was cooler than the arctic cirlce. No way you are folding 2nd set on a rainbow flop with no straight... Its going to happen, ul but next time you make that call your ahead
    Posted by FlashFlush
    Thanks for the comments FF and everyone. My feelings from the comments:

    The villain played this badly and just got lucky that I hit my set. In one way this was a cold deck.
    But next time, I would definitely fold. This was the first hand of a MTT and I am an accomplished MTT player. I know that doubling up early on makes about zero % difference to me winning the tourney or making the FT, whereas losing my stack is clearly catastrophic. As the cards fell, it was a clear call but in the context of the whole tournament, I should have folded - I would have beat the villain over the length of the tourney.

    Thanks everyone.
  • edited September 2009
    In Response to Re: What was wrong with my thinking?:
    Have to disagree, Topchippy. I'm not raising with Pocket 5s, im calling a small raise to flop a set. The flop comes and ive hit my set. The 2BB raise and then the all-in on the flop disguises the top set; only someone seeing the cards can put down 555. I'd call the all-in till the cows come home/all day/any other same-meaning cliche. Just a cold deck; sometimes 'stuff' happens. You dust off, add it to your list of poker stories, and go on to the next comp.
    Posted by jayjaydee[/QUO  u  missed what i said,  a  reraise with  55  would have given him a good read on him  so  disagree but your wrong like he was in not putting in a feeler bet.
  • edited September 2009
    In Response to Re: What was wrong with my thinking?:
    Posted by jayjaydee[/QUO  u  missed what i said,  a  reraise with  55  would have given him a good read on him  so  disagree but your wrong like he was in not putting in a feeler bet.
    Posted by topchipy1
    To say "your wrong" is rather a strong opinion - and grammatically incorrect.
    Poker is a game of opinions (and several other things as well) but it is definitely NOT wrong to smooth call with 55 here.

    There is generally very little point in re-raising with 55 to "find out where you are".
    Depending on stack sizes you want to take a relatively cheap flop to hit your set. If the stack sizes are not big enough to make "set mining" worthwhile then you have to make a decision to shove or fold pre-flop. Obviously in this case, the stacks were large enough to make set mining a very viable choice.
    By re-raising pre-flop, you MAY get someone off a better pair (e.g. 66, 77 or 88) but you are equally likely to get someone playing AK aggressively who will re-re-raise and hence give you no chance to take a cheap flop and hit your set. Losing to a flopped "set under set" is so rare that it should be discounted - certainly given the structure in any tournament on SkyPoker.
    If he slow plays and just calls your re-raise, he might well hold AA, KK or AK so you're really none-the-wiser when the flop hits.

    Still, "Chacun a son gout" as the French say.
  • edited September 2009
    crazy push by set of kings. i agree people shove early in low buy in tourneys with strong hands hoping to get called light. but the villian needs to realise that there is nothing on that board that realistically any 1 could ov hit 2 get paid off with a huge shove.

    tbf, however this hand plays out,(depending on turn and riva cards) you go broke, just one of those things.

    Unfortunatley 4 you, you hit the perfect card. I call that bet all day and night! An d i win the pot 98% of the time.

    You were just unlucky, and if villian continually plays the nuts like that, he is losing serious value!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.