You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....

edited June 2011 in Poker Chat
not entirely sure that this is ok to post on here.  I can't see why not but maybe cos it lists the site names?  but everyone knows the companies in question anyway so I think its ok.

anyway great stuff from Phil Ivey here.

------------------------------------------------------------

For many years, I have been proud to call myself a poker player. This great sport has taken me to places I only imagined going and I have been blessed with much success. It is therefore with deep regret that I believe I am compelled to release the following statement.

I am deeply disappointed and embarrassed that Full Tilt players have not been paid money they are owed. I am equally embarrassed that as a result many players cannot compete in tournaments and have suffered economic harm. I am not playing in the World Series of Poker as I do not believe it is fair that I compete when others cannot. I am doing everything I can to seek a solution to the problem as quickly as possible.

My name and reputation have been dragged through the mud, through the inactivity and indecision of others and on behalf of all poker players I refuse to remain silent any longer. I have electronically filed a lawsuit against Tiltware related to the unsettled player accounts. As I am sure the public can imagine, this was not an easy decision for me.

I whole heartedly refuse to accept non-action as to repayment of players funds and I am angered that people who have supported me throughout my career have been treated so poorly.

I sincerely hope this statement will ignite those capable of resolving the problems into immediate action and would like to clarify that until a solution is reached that cements the security of all players, both US and International, I will, as I have for the last six weeks, dedicate the entirety of my time and efforts to finding a solution for those who have been wronged by the painfully slow process of repayment. 

«1

Comments

  • edited June 2011

    That's a real zomg

    What's more, I fancy you ain't heard nothing yet.

    LOTS more mileage in this, lots more zomgs to come. 
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    That's a real zomg What's more, I fancy you ain't heard nothing yet. LOTS more mileage in this, lots more zomgs to come. 
    Posted by Tikay10

    OK I Admit it,  I turned 48 last week... I'm an old fart........  ZOMG?

  • edited June 2011
    Never ZOMG, sometimes zomg, often zomg11!.
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    Never ZOMG, sometimes zomg, often zomg11!.
    Posted by Machka

    That helped ;o)

  • edited June 2011
    I know in the past couple of years or so Ivey has come to accept his place in the poker world and be much more open about things but this is just a quantum leap from the old Ivey.  Makes you kind of worry about how bad it is there if he feels he has to do this.
  • edited June 2011
    Personally I think that this shows that the site that Phil Ivey is well known for being affiliated with is probably not the best one to be making any new deposits with.  I'm not sure if the withdrawal process is working fine for EU players, but if I had any serious money on there I'd def be withdrawing.

    The other 'big name' poker site that was affected by the whole DOJ thing seems to be far, far more proactive in its entire approach to the DOJ and think they will be fine.

    This action from Ivey only increases the likely hood that FTP will totally sink in the near future.  Not just because if he is making action like this it is clear that things are very wrong with the whole operation, but also because it will probably scare non-US players even more of having funds on there.
  • edited June 2011
    lots more zomgs to come
    You're not wrong. Nick Rainey's litany of complaints about FTP on Quad Jacks contained some *very* serious allegations:

    * 100% rakeback accounts being bought and sold
    * Sponsored players allowed & encouraged to multi-account
    * Player account money being used on marketing/business expenses

    etc etc. crazy stuff.
  • edited June 2011
    In Ivey We Trust!!!
  • edited June 2011

    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    Personally I think that this shows that the site that Phil Ivey is well known for being affiliated with is probably not the best one to be making any new deposits with.  I'm not sure if the withdrawal process is working fine for EU players, but if I had any serious money on there I'd def be withdrawing. The other 'big name' poker site that was affected by the whole DOJ thing seems to be far, far more proactive in its entire approach to the DOJ and think they will be fine. This action from Ivey only increases the likely hood that FTP will totally sink in the near future.  Not just because if he is making action like this it is clear that things are very wrong with the whole operation, but also because it will probably scare non-US players even more of having funds on there.
    Posted by scotty77
    100% agree.
  • edited June 2011
    Tom Dwan has pledged to give back 100% of his earnings as a sponsored pro, if FTP doesn't refund all players in full! :-0

  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    Tom Dwan has pledged to give back 100% of his earnings as a sponsored pro, if FTP doesn't refund all players in full! :-0
    Posted by J-Hartigan
    Does this include all the winnings from the Durrrr challenges?  Oh wait....
  • edited June 2011
    Very commendable (and worrying) public statement from Mr.  Ivey.

    As stated above, I think it is likely to be the tip of the iceberg
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    Very commendable (and worrying) public statement from Mr.  Ivey. As stated above, I think it is likely to be the tip of the iceberg
    Posted by AMYBR
    Have to say, +1 to that, I'm afraid.

    The whole thing is extremely sad, imo. Many reputations in tatters, & I know numerous people associated with the Site in either a business capacity, or as Red Pros, as well as regular players there who are owed a lot of money which they can't get their hands on, though I'm sure they'll get it in due course. I feel for almost all of them, though not those who allegedly sought to circumvent the law. When holding other people's cash, Companies have a very special need to be squeaky clean in every way.  
     
    Contrary to what many may think, I take no pleasure or satisfaction whatsoever in watching the whole house of cards come slowly tumbling down.

    I really wish the whole thing were just a bad dream, but it's a nightmare.  
  • edited June 2011
    I could scour the internet for the answer to this but every time you put Phil Ivey + Full Tilt into a search engine you get a very narrow range from a browser.

    What is the essential business relationship between FT and Ivey these days?  I know he's their poster boy and a red pro, but does he have any integral connection to the business beyond this?

    Breach of trust is the key issue as you say Tikay.  People need to be able to play with complete confidence, but also be able to believe the site is honourable and transparent in their practises.  I logged onto FT last night and was shocked that it was running at about 20% of its previous capacity.
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    Tom Dwan has pledged to give back 100% of his earnings as a sponsored pro, if FTP doesn't refund all players in full! :-0
    Posted by J-Hartigan

    Wow.... Even if that's a small percentage of his worth, that's still an amazing gesture 

  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    I could scour the internet for the answer to this but every time you put Phil Ivey + Full Tilt into a search engine you get a very narrow range from a browser. What is the essential business relationship between FT and Ivey these days?  I know he's their poster boy and a red pro, but does he have any integral connection to the business beyond this? Breach of trust is the key issue as you say Tikay.  People need to be able to play with complete confidence, but also be able to believe the site is honourable and transparent in their practises.  I logged onto FT last night and was shocked that it was running at about 20% of its previous capacity.
    Posted by AMYBR
    Yup.

    To be fair, "20% of previous capacity" is not backed up by reliable traffic stats, which can be viewed at places such as pokerscout, it's not quite that bad yet, & I sincerely hope it stabilises soon.

    FT lost about 35% of it's traffic in the immediate aftermath of Black Friday, iirc, & in the last 4 weeks, has seen further declines of 5%, 5%, 5%, &, last week, 7%, respectively.

    All very sad, but despite my unease with the whole thing, & for my friends & acquaintances who are affected by it, I really have zero-tolerance for any abuse of trust, most especially when it involves holding other peoples money. There can & must be no excuses or caveats on this, none whatsoever.
  • edited June 2011
    For those of who want a quick run through what's happened here, we've put together a quick news piece...

    Phil Ivey Boycotts WSOP
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ.... : Yup. To be fair, "20% of previous capacity" is not backed up by reliable traffic stats, which can be viewed at places such as pokerscout, it's not quite that bad yet, & I sincerely hope it stabilises soon. FT lost about 35% of it's traffic in the immediate aftermath of Black Friday, iirc, & in the last 4 weeks, has seen further declines of 5%, 5%, 5%, &, last week, 7%, respectively. All very sad, but despite my unease with the whole thing, & for my friends & acquaintances who are affected by it, I really have zero-tolerance for any abuse of trust, most especially when it involves holding other peoples money. There can & must be no excuses or caveats on this, none whatsoever.
    Posted by Tikay10
    Potentially time of day was an aspect of the volume I saw.

    Most people know that online poker isnt my preffered format.  But to its credit, these recent issues abroad have highlighted some of the true strengths of Sky Poker.

    There are very clear deposit options, defining responsible gambling clearly with fixed deposit limits.  I always liked that you could multi withdraw without any real hassle, without the option to reverse transfer and such.  Plus the money is normally in your bank within 3 days.  Plus you dont have to go through any ridiculously convoluted ID confirmation to withdraw.  Hate this on some sites.  They'll happily take your money blind, but when it comes to withdrawing its a different matter.

  • edited June 2011
    lol you obviously dont deposit on here a lot :p
  • edited June 2011
    How so?  Which end of the stick am I holding?
  • edited June 2011
    Well I wanted to deposit by credit card.  It wouldnt let me and told me I had to ring sky. 
    Did that.  They said yes no problem, took my details and crediited my account.
    Then when I go to withdraw, I notice they have removed my visa details for two cards and the credit card isnt showing.
    I do however, have a long form to fill in with bank name, address, details etc etc
  • edited June 2011
    Oh.  Cant say I've ever had a problem myself, nor have my housemates,  I've never deposited onto any site from a credit card though. 
  • edited June 2011
    It is not a big problem, just annoying really.  I tend to move my money around a lot depending on bonus' and stuff.  I wouldn't usually use a CC either, the fees are horrid, but my working capital got used up during a change of job so it was either that or don't play. 

    hmm, dont want to derail the thread though, sorry guys ignore me!!
  • edited June 2011
    Dont worry bud, am sure Tikay will be happy people are saying good things about the site :p

    From a whiny ex-51er no less :)
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ.... : Yup. To be fair, "20% of previous capacity" is not backed up by reliable traffic stats, which can be viewed at places such as pokerscout, it's not quite that bad yet, & I sincerely hope it stabilises soon. FT lost about 35% of it's traffic in the immediate aftermath of Black Friday, iirc, & in the last 4 weeks, has seen further declines of 5%, 5%, 5%, &, last week, 7%, respectively. All very sad, but despite my unease with the whole thing, & for my friends & acquaintances who are affected by it, I really have zero-tolerance for any abuse of trust, most especially when it involves holding other peoples money. There can & must be no excuses or caveats on this, none whatsoever.
    Posted by Tikay10
    is anyone suggesting full tilt players should withdraw there bankroll or will be unable too?
  • edited June 2011
    I have electronically filed a lawsuit against Tiltware.

    As far as im aware Phil Ivey owns 5% of FTP, is this true?  So he has started a lawsuit against himself?
    It must be a very BIG thing for him to not play the WSOP, so hats off to him.
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ....:
    In Response to Re: Phil Ivey statement RE DOJ.... : is anyone suggesting full tilt players should withdraw there bankroll or will be unable too?
    Posted by sunnyhil03
    Haven't any personal experience but I have seen a lot of people (Europe and US) say they have put in withdrawal requests and these are either still pending or took a longer than usual time to cashout.  Take that as you will.
  • edited June 2011
    Phil Ivey will get a lot of respect for what he has done with regard to the WSOP. What won't get a lot of respect is FT's latest statement released a couple of days ago, regarding paying out. This is an actual quote from that statement "When will the US players be paid?

    We still do not have a specific timeframe for this. There has been, and remains, no bigger priority than getting US players paid as soon as possible, and we have been working around the clock to get this done"
    Yes thats sure to keep the pros happy.
  • edited June 2011
    Cleared my account on there just after black friday and it came through back to the cc reasonably quick. UB however is a different kettle with a limit of $250 dollars per week. Pity the person who took down the bb jackpot just before this all occured.
  • edited June 2011
    i dont play on FTP i did once and never liked it. Since Black Friday it seems like a few other named sites its found it difficult to recover.

    I know that the one other site i do play on that was effected by black friday has recovered fully and withdraws and desposits are simpler than ever.

    I think there is far worse to come out of this. I know on the other site players who where sponsored who where effected now are registered at "united kingdom" or "canada" rather than US. This seems to be common amougst many american poker players.

    The WSOP will likley suffer this year and if i remember correctly ESPN pulled out of televising it aswell although would need to have that confirmed.

    I think this situation is only one which will get worse. However i fully believe the online poker world will come out stronger after it.
Sign In or Register to comment.