You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Cash for Points - Good Deal?

edited June 2011 in Poker Chat
As it says on the tin, is it time sky looked at the cash for points offering?

I mentioned in another thread that once you get beyond 10k points, the thresholds for extra rakeback increase to 2k then 4k. Clearly unless you are some 20 tabling crazed lunatic, these thresholds are very difficult to achieve and personally I wouldnt bother playing. My take is sky are effectively raking back the rakeback!

Other sites offer a facility where you can encash points on any day once you reach a set threshold, then any remaining points are left banked rather than swept into the sky blackhole. 

What do other players think?? 
«1

Comments

  • edited June 2011
    I think the only change sky needs is to make extra points over the threshold carry over to next month- that way they're not wasted every time.

    But, I'm sure that's been done to death. Down at the 3k mark where I am, it really doesn't affect me- but I'd be mad if I was playing high stakes, and it's not doing sky any favours- for every player that puts in a few extra hours to hit their target, there's gonna be players that decide not to bother playing as hard, or at all in the last couple days of a month because there's no realistic way of hitting their target.

    Let the unused points carry over=no problems. Would actually be a big help to new players too, who can probably get 1k with regular playing, but would struggle hitting 2k- having the points carry over each month would be a nice little boost for them every 2 months, and it hardly hurts sky does it?
  • edited June 2011

     I have to agree the whole thing needs a revamp. It is only due to the community spirirt on here that I don't go play elsewhere, where I could receive 35% Rakeback for every £1 I play. I am also collecting poker points daily and they are sat in my account gathering dust. Isn't it about time SKY opened a reward shop with merchandise and bonuses etc available to buy.
  • edited June 2011

    Some points to note :

    1. SkyPoker's reward scheme is less rewarding than most other site's rakeback offerings. (I calculated a while ago that I was getting the equivalent of 28% RB.... the figure is obviously a lot lower for lower volume / lower stakes players).

    2.  The two largest poker sites have traditionally not chased players through offering super rakeback schemes. Full Tilt have made it very difficult previously for already signed up players to get any RB, and PokerStars do not offer RB in the accepted sense, but a rewards scheme. This has been improved significantly over time, but is not the best offer in the market. (In other words, there are lots of other reasons to play at a poker site, other than puely rakeback).

    3.  The PokerStars rewards scheme allows you to either use points for merchandise, or for bonuses... not both. 

    4.  Given some of the  stories coming out relating to other sites, and problems / potential problems that they are facing, I feel far more secure playing on SkyPoker, than on any other site ATM.

    5.  There is no harm in encouraging SkyPoker to improve their offer......



  • edited June 2011
    +1 needs to sort it out

    also all these points we have can we not get rid of on 1k freeroll points and have like a 2000 gurantee to make it worthwhile. me nor anyone else are not going to play all these 25 or 50 points freerolls

    if your not going to do a monthly bigger freeroll maybe do a way you can use for Sit n gos/ satelites or tournament tickets

    seriously sky firstly the ladders need sorting then for these unused points
  • edited June 2011
    Think i agree with everything thats been said in here so far, the big jumps from like 12k to 16k to 20k points is where a lot of dead points go to waste, the points jumps should be less like 2k aswell
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
                 (I calculated a while ago that I was getting the equivalent of 28% RB.... the figure is obviously a lot lower for lower volume / lower stakes players).                 
    This must be with a lot of volume?  The value must come from the higher rate after 12k.  I'm sure i got mine at around 20%, maybe slightly less, and i'm a nit in a non contribution based system.  But i'm only making between 12-20k points per month.  It makes life a lot harder when you can't even see how many hands you've played in a month without counting each one seperately in each session (lol.)
    I guess providing this most basic information would make it too easy to find out relative RB% which wouldn't be a good thing for Sky ;)
  • edited June 2011
    the point that a lot of people miss is that the VAST majoirty of the rakeback deals aren't offered thru the sites themselves. 

    the sites allow affiliates to offer them.  and the affiliates have been known to make promises that they can't keep/run off with the funds

    Sky Pokers promo is heavily promoted thru the site and there is no middle man.  while there are 'better' deals out there, you aren't taking the risk of trusting a middle man, which is usually a one man band operation using rented office space half way around the globe.
  • edited June 2011
    I like it the way it is.

    Make it better and it will attract better players!

    In fact, scrap it altogether!! - Just give us tourny entries and stuff instead of cash

    ;)
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    Some points to note : 1. SkyPoker's reward scheme is less rewarding than most other site's rakeback offerings. (I calculated a while ago that I was getting the equivalent of 28% RB.... the figure is obviously a lot lower for lower volume / lower stakes players). 2.  The two largest poker sites have traditionally not chased players through offering super rakeback schemes. Full Tilt have made it very difficult previously for already signed up players to get any RB, and PokerStars do not offer RB in the accepted sense, but a rewards scheme. This has been improved significantly over time, but is not the best offer in the market. (In other words, there are lots of other reasons to play at a poker site, other than puely rakeback). 3.  The PokerStars rewards scheme allows you to either use points for merchandise, or for bonuses... not both.  4.  Given some of the  stories coming out relating to other sites, and problems / potential problems that they are facing, I feel far more secure playing on SkyPoker, than on any other site ATM. 5.  There is no harm in encouraging SkyPoker to improve their offer......
    Posted by jakally
    You are 100% correct about trusting sky. However, there are a lot more UK based on-line players than the hardcore 3000 that turn up every day on sky. Having an archaic rakeback scheme doesnt help.

    Quite frankly no one should lose any points. It is up to the players to make noises about this. Personally im like a dog on a bone with this issue I wont let it go until sky have a fairer system.

    As players and more importantly customers of sky, we need to make them hear our concerns.
  • edited June 2011

     UP THE REVOLUTION!
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    the point that a lot of people miss is that the VAST majoirty of the rakeback deals aren't offered thru the sites themselves.  the sites allow affiliates to offer them.  and the affiliates have been known to make promises that they can't keep/run off with the funds Sky Pokers promo is heavily promoted thru the site and there is no middle man.  while there are 'better' deals out there, you aren't taking the risk of trusting a middle man, which is usually a one man band operation using rented office space half way around the globe.
    Posted by scotty77
    Party poker have a system similar to sky but they have a points store. You can exchange points for £10 cash right up to a BMW coupe! You exchange points in their virtual store when you need to. This effectively is a rake back scheme where you dont lose any points at a set point in the month. The choice of when points are redeemed is at the players discretion.
  • edited June 2011

     To be honest I have played on a lot of sites and I cannot think of another one that does not have some sort of reward store or does not enable you to swop points for cash / bonuses whenever you want. The majority of sites also have some sort of reward ladder e.g. bronze, silver, gold etc. I would personally like to nominate Acegooner to the role of Rewards Champion for SKYPoker. Just don't forget the micro grinders.
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
     To be honest I have played on a lot of sites and I cannot think of another one that does not have some sort of reward store or does not enable you to swop points for cash / bonuses whenever you want. The majority of sites also have some sort of reward ladder e.g. bronze, silver, gold etc. I would personally like to nominate Acegooner to the role of Rewards Champion for SKYPoker. Just don't forget the micro grinders.
    Posted by 68Trebor
    Trebor in all honesty until last month(got 10k) my highest c4p was about 4.8k, and yes i was peeved about losing 800 points but I didnt understand the scheme at that stage. I do not consider myself a high roller in any sense of the word, so yes I am coming from a lower stakes players point of view.

  • edited June 2011
    I think it depends on the site too.  Better players, or players who take the time, tend to go where the better deals are.  So, the worse the deal, generally worse players so better profit.

    I play on one site that has a pretty decent deal in that it gives you 25% of a deposit straight away.  But the other 75% is near on impossible to crack.  I have been playing there two months and have cleared about 10% (which is immaterial cause you need to do it within 30 days).  This means the standard is a lot worse than you would find on some somewhere that gives 35% rakeback (in general, I am not saying there arent good players, far from it)

    It is a trade off
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    I think it depends on the site too.  Better players, or players who take the time, tend to go where the better deals are.  So, the worse the deal, generally worse players so better profit. I play on one site that has a pretty decent deal in that it gives you 25% of a deposit straight away.  But the other 75% is near on impossible to crack.  I have been playing there two months and have cleared about 10% (which is immaterial cause you need to do it within 30 days).  This means the standard is a lot worse than you would find on some somewhere that gives 35% rakeback (in general, I am not saying there arent good players, far from it) It is a trade off
    Posted by MrWh1te
    Im not necessarily asking for more rakeback, my point is that points should not be taken away at the end of each month.
  • edited June 2011
    I rely on Cash for Points bonuses and I am apparently actually in the minority who quite like it how is (I haven't voted though as I am not saying it couldn't be improved, just that it's not bad at all as it stands.)

    Firstly, the deal itself is pretty good imo. From what I have read, though, it seems that cash players may not get as much as I thought. As a SnG player it's pretty great (can't remember what I once calculated but it goes up to something like 57.5% I believe).

    Secondly, as has been said, Sky is very reliable and imo the system is much easier to understand and use (in fact you don't have to do anything). I don't like the idea of merchandise stores and having to 'buy' bonuses as you have to calculate for yourself how to give yourself the best the deal.

    Thirdly, I actually like that it gives me set targets each month. It's pretty easy tbh (as a SnG player at least) to plan ahead so that you have no last minute rush at all. I can decide in the last 5 days of the month, say, whether to work hard for 2 days and take 3 complete days off or to just breeze through the last 5 days, it's my choice.

    All that been said I fully understand and see the appeal in calls for points to be 'carried over' so as not to be wasted. At the end of the day, though, I am concerned that such 'give' on Skys part might necessitate 'take' in that the actual moneys per point might drop. Whilst this will benefit some it will also harm others who work to targets based around the structure that currently exists.

    JC 
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal? : Im not necessarily asking for more rakeback, my point is that points should not be taken away at the end of each month.
    Posted by ACEGOONER
    Which will invariably increase the rakeback.

    For the record, I am not against what you are saying, I would love to carry points over.  Many times I have hit a ceiling on points and then played on another site because there was no point grinding here as I knew I wouldnt make the next point.  And I am only on 1000/2000 points roughly a month.  I will get to say 1k points then go elsewhere.  It would make me play here longer, for sure.

    I was just pointing out that the better players will go where the bets deals are, at all levels.  The real fish, the real dead money, is to be found with guys who don't know any better so tend to stay at the same site
  • edited June 2011
     I rarely check what points I've got because I don't use them. What matters in the end is the enjoyability of the site - which is where Sky scores way above the rest - and the balance in the account. If I had to choose 1 site and only one site it would be Sky without question and that is because of the people who run it and the friendly interaction with them. TK/ Hartigan et al are all willing to debate with you and treat you as an equal ( even tho' we players are superior ). No where else would you get that. Forget the points , reduce the rake (?) and give free entry to something big for every bad beat. Then the site would be perfect.
  • edited June 2011
    I like the current system.  Things can always be improved but I wouldn't complain about the current system.  They cover the important things:

    1)  In my experience SkyPoker always pay the money into your account within the timeframe of the deal.  This is very important in my experience (I remember the old 'Gamble-Equal' days with people posting 'where's my Cake?' on and on.

    2)  You know how much you will receive and how far you are from the next level.

    Also unlike other schemes you don't have to earn points after claiming the bonus as well as before, and if you take a month off your earning potential isn't as hampered as on other sites.

    All together I'm very happy with it.
  • edited June 2011
    I don't mind it as it is. I think the suggestion to carry over points earned that fell short of the next ladder up into next months c4p's a good idea though.
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal? : You are 100% correct about trusting sky. However, there are a lot more UK based on-line players than the hardcore 3000 that turn up every day on sky. Having an archaic rakeback scheme doesnt help. Quite frankly no one should lose any points. It is up to the players to make noises about this. Personally im like a dog on a bone with this issue I wont let it go until sky have a fairer system. As players and more importantly customers of sky, we need to make them hear our concerns.
    Posted by ACEGOONER

    I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but if you are not happy, why don't you go somewhere else.

    I wouldn't go to Sainsbury's every week, moan to the management about their prices, tell them I'm like a dog with a bone and won't let it drop............... and then keep going back every week.

    Deciding where to take your business, (in anything, not  just online poker) depends on the things that are most important to you.
    If bonuses / rakeback are THE most important thing to you, then go to the site that offers the best RB.

    Each site offers a package. Sky's package includes lower bonuses, and less flexible software, but also no tracking software, therefore a lower volume of good grinders.
    ATM I am broadly happy with the Sky package, therefore I play here. If a better package comes along then I would go somewhere else.

    Having said all that, GL with your quest. Wouldn't complain if you got some improvements that put a few more pounds into my pocket.



  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal? : I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but if you are not happy, why don't you go somewhere else. I wouldn't go to Sainsbury's every week, moan to the management about their prices, tell them I'm like a dog with a bone and won't let it drop............... and then keep going back every week. Deciding where to take your business, (in anything, not  just online poker) depends on the things that are most important to you. If bonuses / rakeback are THE most important thing to you, then go to the site that offers the best RB. Each site offers a package. Sky's package includes lower bonuses, and less flexible software, but also no tracking software, therefore a lower volume of good grinders. ATM I am broadly happy with the Sky package, therefore I play here. If a better package comes along then I would go somewhere else. Having said all that, GL with your quest. Wouldn't complain if you got some improvements that put a few more pounds into my pocket.
    Posted by jakally
    Fair does your entitled to your opinion. I played on sky full time last month, I would have played more if I knew I wouldnt lose any points between 12-16k. The way I look at it is I have a second site party poker which I will use when I go through a points threshold where the next level is unatainable. From a commercial perspective that is bad for sky because thats equivalent to three or four days business.

    PS with regards to your shopping analogy, its like going into a supermarket and not being given any change!
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal? :  , I buy my food from waitrose/M&S 
    Posted by ACEGOONER

    If you can afford Waitrose and M&S, you don't need  any cash for points..... :)

  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal? : If you can afford Waitrose and M&S, you don't need  any cash for points..... :)
    Posted by jakally
    Waitrose keep sending me 15% off vouchers what am i supposed to do!
  • edited June 2011

    Lol..i just won a £1.10 £25 guaranteed tourny...took me over 2 hours and i got...wait for it.....................................................................................................








    ONE POKER POINT


    I don't care about the poker points though, i play because i find this the best place to play.

    channel 865.
    Play on your tv.
    Awesome forum.
    6 Handed tables.
    A wide range of different game types.

    The bonuses are just extra's imo.



  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal? : Waitrose keep sending me 15% off vouchers what am i supposed to do!
    Posted by ACEGOONER
    Lidl FTW
  • edited June 2011
    Carrying points over would be nice but apart from that i'm very happy with sky.
  • edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash for Points - Good Deal?:
    I like it the way it is. Make it better and it will attract better players! In fact, scrap it altogether!! - Just give us tourny entries and stuff instead of cash ;)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH

    +1
  • edited June 2011

    Ok it seems like there are two camps:

    1) Those that dont want any change and think the current system makes the site profitable for good players
    2) Those that want fine tuning, eg carry forward of points each month or a reduction in points difference between thresholds

    I personally favour 2. I hope this is read by someone important in sky poker, there is an overwhelming majority in favour for change although the sample size is small.

  • edited June 2011
    I think what is important to note, is I am sure sky don't just pick these figures out of the air.

    They will work out their profit margins based on the games, rake etc, see how much they can afford to give back, then work from there.
    Whilst I am sure they could afford to give back slightly more, I am also pretty sure that if they were to carry points over, especially for the high stakes guys were points are worth a lot more, they might reduce the payouts or increase points to compensate.  I don't think any business would agree to just hand out what would be a lot more money
Sign In or Register to comment.