Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Just been catching up on threads as have been busy last week or so. When you read them in bulk it paints an odd picture. Mainly of people venting and apologising a few days later. People half accepting discrepencies on some aspects, while hugely deriding others.
I truly havent played a game on here for months, I have tackled a few sessions on other sites with lingering funds, and deposit a drab just to stave off boredom from time to time.
But taking everything into account: your own experiences, the experiences of others, outstanding legal issues/worries -
Do you believe that online poker is faulty, whether intentionally or unintentionally?
We are all well versed in the debate, both sides for and against. I'm simply enquiring into peoples true belief.
I'm happy to be the first, I say Yes.
0 ·
Comments
The interesting fact is that Dave's parody of this thread has nearly 70 posts, whereas only 3 people clearly stated their view to a direct yeas or no question.
Simply meaning that there is still a lot of people who dont feel strongly either way, dont want their views known or acknowledge it is a debatable subject.
BUT IT IS A YES OR NO ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL, THATS THE POINT!
I hope it turns round for you bud.
Yes in general its not a yes or no answer, there is much to debate on the issue.
But this thread was designed for simplicity so that it didnt turn into a multi topic debate. By definition, the question is asked with a Yes or NO answer in mind, that was the point!!
Seems pretty clear what the intention of the thread is, hence the vast majority of people answering a simple yes or no.
If I wanted to put a not sure category I would have.
So missing the point its beyond funny....
There are tonnes of debatable threads, this was CLEARLY designed to be definitive, not debatable.
Hence people answering yes or no. Why is there always someone desperate to get their jollies by needless argument.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM
Once again, it isnt a yes or no answer in general, it is a much debatable topic. But this particular thread WAS intended as a simple yes or no response, as opposed to the multitude of other threads where debate is standard.
As stated in OP, we all know the arguments for and against. It was simply designed for individuals to state their definitive belief, it was pretty clear.
Yes, the word faulty was chosen with intent, to cover those many issues. So that only people with a strong feeling either way would cast their opinion, everyone else in between saying nothing.
Again I say, you are arguing for the sake of it and simply trying to score points, where in reality you just look like a fool. Everyone else understood the intent of this thread, yet you argue on with semantics.