All Categories› Poker› Community Suggestions

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Table Distribution Revisited. Sky need to sort!

EyemanEyeman
edited July 2011 in Community Suggestions
A month or so ago there was discussion upon how the tables are balanced in Sky tournaments.

During the debate, it became clear that when a player is moved from a table of 6 (to leave 5 for balancing purposes) it is the player who is about to be on the button that is moved.

At the time it was made clear that this was unacceptable - this is a massive disadvantage to that player - they have just paid both blinds, and deserve a go on the button - much better to move the big blind as happens in all live tournaments (until a table is broken entirely).

Is there any way this mistake can be rectified, or at least can we have notification that it will be addressed at the next update.

Poker is unfair enough with all the variance without cheating players out of their go on the button!
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH
    edited July 2011
    In Response to Table Distribution Revisited. Sky need to sort!:
    A month or so ago there was discussion upon how the tables are balanced in Sky tournaments. During the debate, it became clear that when a player is moved from a table of 6 (to leave 5 for balancing purposes) it is the player who is about to be on the button that is moved. At the time it was made clear that this was unacceptable - this is a massive disadvantage to that player - they have just paid both blinds, and deserve a go on the button - much better to move the big blind as happens in all live tournaments (until a table is broken entirely). Is there any way this mistake can be rectified, or at least can we have notification that it will be addressed at the next update. Poker is unfair enough with all the variance without cheating players out of their go on the button!
    Posted by Eyeman
    Lol @ this bit. I'm not sure unfair is the right word. 


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EyemanEyeman
    edited July 2011
    It's unfair when you lose, and perfectly fair when you win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • spornybolspornybol
    edited July 2011
    In Response to Re: Table Distribution Revisited. Sky need to sort!:
    It's unfair when you lose, and perfectly fair when you win.
    Posted by Eyeman
    JUST HAD IT IN LATER STAGES IN TSP IN B/BLIND PLAYER RAISE HAD TO FOLD THEN MOVED STRATE INTO B/BLIND AND ANOTHER RAISE, AGAIN HAD RUBBISH BUT WOULD LIKE A COUPLE HAND TO SEE WHO AGGRO PLAYER IS ON A NEW TABLE,
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EyemanEyeman
    edited July 2011
    Bumpety bump - this needs sorting, Sky. Moving the person who has earned the button is wrong all day and all night long.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.