You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Cash game on Channel 5

edited August 2011 in Poker Chat
Anyone else see this ?

The amateur player limps in with KK, and inevitably gets 3 callers including Phil Hellmuth with A9. Flop comes 10 9 9, and the chips go in, putting the amateur out of the game if Phils trips hold up.

Phil then offers to run it 4 times, which the other guy agrees.

Obviously he was not doing it to be nice by letting his opponent have a chance of saving a few chips, but to protect himself against an outrageous outdraw,as it was a huge pot.

First run the 9s held up, second go the king comes, third he loses to a runner runner flush, and in the last one the case king appears ! Phil went quiet for a bit but Negreanu and Tony G loved it.

Is this common in cash games, and was Phil right to do it ? And how big were the odds ?

Comments

  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7GkgwQ0ZQQ
    Posted by Darntootin
    Yes, I've seen this hand - went right in to my top 3 poker hands of all time. Negreanu cackling through the whole thing was pretty awesome too ;)
  • edited August 2011

    the look on phils face!! negrano having kittens.   karma!!

  • edited August 2011
    I was going to start a thread on this as I thought it was pretty disgraceful tbh.

    Someone started a thread a while ago asking why people hate Phil Hellmuth so much.

    I though Laak, Negranue and Tony G were hugely out of order on this particular show, down to a perceived slowroll by hellmuth.  Yes Hellmuth did take slightly too long to 3bet allin on flop, the hollywood wasnt entirely neccessary but he wanted to ensure he got the last of the guys money.  Then every time the guy hits his super thin outs they jump up and down and celebrate, high fiving and and all the rest.  Super bad form.  To his credit Hellmuth doesnt say a word, shaking the amateurs hand on the 3rd run.  Despite all the needling he only gets close to a melt down once with G's runner runner boat (45), likely only then down to the constant abuse.

    If the boot was on the other foot here ther'd be uproar.  Negranue has run ridiculously bad in HSP series in the past.  If Hellmuth had been running around high 5ing the super lucky opponent I'm pretty darn sure Negranue and co. would have taken huge offense.  You only had to look at Doyle to see hw they should have acted, stoic and impartial.

    Only time I can remember being severley annoyed by negranue and Laak.

    Thought it was really really bad form.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    I was going to start a thread on this as I thought it was pretty disgraceful tbh. Someone started a thread a while ago asking why people hate Phil Hellmuth so much. I though Laak, Negranue and Tony G were hugely out of order on this particular show, down to a perceived slowroll by hellmuth.  Yes Hellmuth did take slightly too long to 3bet allin on flop, the hollywood wasnt entirely neccessary but he wanted to ensure he got the last of the guys money.  Then every time the guy hits his super thin outs they jump up and down and celebrate, high fiving and and all the rest.  Super bad form.  To his credit Hellmuth doesnt say a word, shaking the amateurs hand on the 3rd run.  Despite all the needling he only gets close to a melt down once with G's runner runner boat (45), likely only then down to the constant abuse. If the boot was on the other foot here ther'd be uproar.  Negranue has run ridiculously bad in HSP series in the past.  If Hellmuth had been running around high 5ing the super lucky opponent I'm pretty darn sure Negranue and co. would have taken huge offense.  You only had to look at Doyle to see hw they should have acted, stoic and impartial. Only time I can remember being severley annoyed by negranue and Laak. Thought it was really really bad form.
    Posted by AMYBR

    This is what happens when people set themselves up for a fall.

    At one end of the spectrum, you have an arrogant, egotistical, deluded multi millionnaire, plonker playing and losing probably like 0.1% of his bankroll.

    The other end of the spectrum is a modest, speculative amateur playing in the biggest game of his life.

    The 2 clashing, and the underdog winning is gonna lead to huge satisfaction for both the players and the audience who have to listen to that moron chirping away about how he's the best in the world. 

    Not to mention the cannon now has a bigger stack for the pros to go after.

    Theres alot of BS spoken about "etiquette" in poker imo. 

    Of course you should respect and appreciate your collegues achievements, but at the end of the day you're trying to take his money, all of his money, and you would love to see him go broke.

    Just watch the build up/press conference before any big boxing match. Poker should be the same imo.

    But yeh, run better Phil! ;) lol
  • edited August 2011
    TBH - I think hellmuth was showing off when he offered to run it 4 times and the hand was played particularly badly by mr amature with the KK no where near enough raise preflop (although preflop was pot limit post flop nl). Hellmuth had the trips on the flop and felt he was secure. Offering to run it twice was nice run it four times should have been rubbing it in other than interferance by the poker gods.

    Lacks main critism (sp) was the call pre flop by hellmuth. TonyG was just out to get under the brats skin all through the game and Negranu was just needling  bit and cheering the dog.
  • edited August 2011
    You see most of the players doing this to Hellmuth in most of the televised cash games.

    They're just trying to wind him up.

    It was interesting to see his little piece to camera though. Explaining how he's trying to change with a mind coach as he knows he's not playing optimally when he's upset.

    That would explain why he acted so differently at the WSOP.
  • edited August 2011
    I was going to start a thread on this myself because I thought it was really interesting. I agree with AMYBR on this, I thought it was bang out of order what the majority of the players were doing. I was disappointed by Daniel especially, he's definitely my favourite poker player and one reason for this is from what I've seen he's always a really nice guy.
     
    Incidently (I think someone asked), I think they said the odds of him winning 3 out of the 4 runs was 0.14 of a percent.

    I also thought he was kind of peer pressured into offering to run it 4 times because they were making him feeling bad for 'slowrolling it'. To be honest, I know he was trying to be nice and give him a chance but I'm not a fan of running hands multiple times. I only see it being in anyway beneficial if it's a flip and even then, I'd rather take my chances, if I didn't want to take that chance I wouldn't have put my chips in in the first place.

    I've watched a couple of episodes of this show and to be honest I think that Wiggins is being mega passive. I know it's the biggest game of his life and he doesn't wanna go break but he just does not bet when he's clearly got the best hand, he's always check calling which I don't like. And personally in that hand, I think he was definitely in the wrong to not re-raise pre with KK, where he may have been able to get rid of Helmuth (although he'd have ended up winning less that way this particular time lol)

    I'm just well impressed that Helmuth kept his cool (for the most part). I don't blame him for having a bit of a go at Tony G who just wouldn't leave it.
  • edited August 2011
    come on amybr/lambert, we all like an underdog to win (unless it against us). like dohhh said the money on that hand means very little to phil, and he does set himself up for it. phil must be such a great player to be as succesful as he is with such a big flaw in his game. how someone who can be tilted that easy by laak (anyone else for that matter who wants to wind him) make soo much money. if i was negranu(or any pro) i would make it my life mission to tilt him as it is prob the only edge i would have on him.  great player yes, great person no!
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    I was going to start a thread on this myself because I thought it was really interesting. I agree with AMYBR on this, I thought it was bang out of order what the majority of the players were doing. I was disappointed by Daniel especially, he's definitely my favourite poker player and one reason for this is from what I've seen he's always a really nice guy.   Incidently (I think someone asked), I think they said the odds of him winning 3 out of the 4 runs was 0.14 of a percent. I also thought he was kind of peer pressured into offering to run it 4 times because they were making him feeling bad for 'slowrolling it'. To be honest, I know he was trying to be nice and give him a chance but I'm not a fan of running hands multiple times. I only see it being in anyway beneficial if it's a flip and even then, I'd rather take my chances, if I didn't want to take that chance I wouldn't have put my chips in in the first place. I've watched a couple of episodes of this show and to be honest I think that Wiggins is being mega passive. I know it's the biggest game of his life and he doesn't wanna go break but he just does not bet when he's clearly got the best hand, he's always check calling which I don't like. And personally in that hand, I think he was definitely in the wrong to not re-raise pre with KK, where he may have been able to get rid of Helmuth (although he'd have ended up winning less that way this particular time lol) I'm just well impressed that Helmuth kept his cool (for the most part). I don't blame him for having a bit of a go at Tony G who just wouldn't leave it.
    Posted by Lambert180
    Totally agree.  Spot on with the peer pressure i believe.

    Hellmuth firmly stated his point of view on a couple of things and mostly left it at that.

    People tend to forget that Tony G has the tendancy to be maliciously unpleasant at the table, far worse than Hellmuth whining.

    But because its Hellmuth its ok to act this way?  Not at all.  When Negrenau binks the Q's full over G's turned BW, if Hellmuth (or anyone) had acted in an equal way there would have been major issues.  Also you would have definately seen the true nature of G. 

    Not often a word I'll associate with Hellmuth (admittidly) but he took his lunps without saying a word.  I agree in a way that he does court this kind of reaction from his peers, but it still does not make it OK.  Double standard for the win.........
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    come on amybr/lambert, we all like an underdog to win (unless it against us). like dohhh said the money on that hand means very little to phil, and he does set himself up for it. phil must be such a great player to be as succesful as he is with such a big flaw in his game. how someone who can be tilted that easy by laak (anyone else for that matter who wants to wind him) make soo much money. if i was negranu(or any pro) i would make it my life mission to tilt him as it is prob the only edge i would have on him.  great player yes, great person no!
    Posted by pod1
    I do like an underdog to win (as long as it's not against me) but not in a situation where a massive underdog gives the favourite a real beating. The odds were around 95% Hellmuth, 5% Wiggins when the money was all-in. Now good luck to him if he wins 1 of them so he's still in the game, or maybe even 2, but to win 3 out of 4 and to have everyone high fiving each other and what not.

    Obviously this was only done because it was Hellmuth but if it was me, there's no way I'd have kept my cool as well as Hellmuth did. And I think I deal very well with tilt or rather not tilting. I dunno, maybe it's just cos I know I wouldn't like it doing to me is why I didn't like it. I normally don't mind a bit of people winding Hellmuth up but that was more than normal
  • edited August 2011
    did make for grat tv mind!!!
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    did make for grat tv mind!!!
    Posted by pod1
    Lol yes it did. Sick of seeing the same old shows repeated on the Information Channel. This show on channel 5 is the first poker programme in ages that's caught my eye. It baffles me why more channels don't have things like this running when it's such a cheap set up and very popular.
  • edited August 2011
    this is one of the best poker hands i have ever seen
    hellmuth slowrolls him really badly and there is no denying that
    the other pros want the loose cannon to win because:
    a) he is a weaker player, weaker play with more money is good for them
    b) it makes for a good TV show when the loose cannon is winning
    c) tilting hellmuth makes him play even worse and thus they win more money
    d) hellmuth tilting also makes for a good TV show


    if you're talking about bad etiquette then a more recent episode when tony G tells Hellmuth multiple times that he hasnt looked at his cards after he shoves preflop for $30-40,000 when infact he has looked and holds AK vs hellmuth who ships in AJ, that is terrible etiquette.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    this is one of the best poker hands i have ever seen hellmuth slowrolls him really badly and there is no denying that the other pros want the loose cannon to win because: a) he is a weaker player, weaker play with more money is good for them b) it makes for a good TV show when the loose cannon is winning c) tilting hellmuth makes him play even worse and thus they win more money d) hellmuth tilting also makes for a good TV show if you're talking about bad etiquette then a more recent episode when tony G tells Hellmuth multiple times that he hasnt looked at his cards after he shoves preflop for $30-40,000 when infact he has looked and holds AK vs hellmuth who ships in AJ, that is terrible etiquette.
    Posted by LOL_RAISE
    Yeah I definitely agree with you on that one about bad etiquette from TonyG although personally when I'm in a live game, I don't believe someone is blind unless I've been watching properly and know they definitely haven't looked at their cards.
  • edited August 2011


        Can somone explain why players run a hand again (sometimes as here more than once) i have seen it loads of times but dont know the reasoning behind it.
     
    cheers
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
        Can somone explain why players run a hand again (sometimes as here more than once) i have seen it loads of times but dont know the reasoning behind it.   cheers
    Posted by JONONZIE
    The most common reason I've seen is, both people get all their chips in and it's a flip say, AK against JJ. Neither one is really that big a favourite but one of them is going to lose a full BI (maybe more) over it, which could be hundreds of thousands in them high stakes games, so basically they run it twice, and if things go the way odds suggest, AK will win one, JJ will win one, and they basically get their money back, so it's less risk on both part.

    Why you'd want to run a couple of times when you're a massive favourite I don't know.
  • edited August 2011
    As far as I can calculate (with help from pokerstove) , the odds on Phil losing running once were about 14%

    Then with one king gone, the next run was 10%, and on the last down to 6%.

    So the chances of him losing 3 in a row were over 1000/1.




    As regards behaviour/etiquette, unfortunately in a world of reality TV, the TV companies in their quest for ratings will always feature players like Hellmuth, Laak, Schwartz and TonyG, and will be encouraging conflict.

  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    As far as I can calculate (with help from pokerstove) , the odds on Phil losing running once were about 14% Then with one king gone, the next run was 10%, and on the last down to 6%. So the chances of him losing 3 in a row were over 1000/1. As regards behaviour/etiquette, unfortunately in a world of reality TV, the TV companies in their quest for ratings will always feature players like Hellmuth, Laak, Schwartz and TonyG, and will be encouraging conflict.
    Posted by penguin7
    Yeah I mentioned it in a post above, they said what the percentage chance of him beating him 3 out of 4 times on the show and it was something like 0.14 of a percent.

    But yeah, I won't argue it wasn't entertaining to watch, just would have been mighty annoyed if I was Hellmuth.
  • edited August 2011
    I've seen it and while Negraneau does overreact I think it is because he is rooting for the amateur and not especially to wind up Helmuth. I'm not  fan of Phil Helmuth, he strikes me as a sore loser but in this situation he reacts very well so all credit to him. I'll still defend Daniel though because it was a one off and totally out of character. And it was great viewing.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5 : The most common reason I've seen is, both people get all their chips in and it's a flip say, AK against JJ. Neither one is really that big a favourite but one of them is going to lose a full BI (maybe more) over it, which could be hundreds of thousands in them high stakes games, so basically they run it twice, and if things go the way odds suggest, AK will win one, JJ will win one, and they basically get their money back, so it's less risk on both part. Why you'd want to run a couple of times when you're a massive favourite I don't know.
    Posted by Lambert180
    because the amount of times you run it has no bearing on your chances of winning. If someones a 5% chance of winning its 5% whether they run it once, twice, 4 times etc. The only  advantage to running it multiple times is to iron out variance.  In a scenario like this though surely the loose cannon should never run it multiple times because they dont get to keep anything under the 100 grand?

    Also Phil Hellmuth has terrible etiquette so he has opened himself up to taunting like this from other players. If you sit there telling people how bad they are and berating people then you should not be surrprised when people celebrate when you lose. Phil knows this and accepts it i think. He realises its all for tv.
  • edited August 2011
    great show !!  how hellmuth didnt snap call , ill never know.    Didn't they say the odds were 0.18 percent !!
    great tv.
  • edited August 2011
    hmm  maybe I am well wrong but am I the only one who sees hellmuths reasoning s different to that mentioned?

    to me it looked more like a 'haha I am so far ahead, ieven if we run it loads of times you would hardly ever win, look how good i am'

    rather than him being gracious, i think he was being more mean
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5 : because the amount of times you run it has no bearing on your chances of winning. If someones a 5% chance of winning its 5% whether they run it once, twice, 4 times etc. The only  advantage to running it multiple times is to iron out variance.  In a scenario like this though surely the loose cannon should never run it multiple times because they dont get to keep anything under the 100 grand?
    As the cards are not reshuffled his chances do drop each time the first time he lost a k ie 1 out of his 2 gone the second time he made runner runner spades so even less chance of a flush on the end one.

    The loose cannon in this case would be foolish not to run it multiple times he is all in and all of his money is on the line as a huge underdog. If he gets it right 1/4 then he has half his chip stack back. The pot being divided into 4 for the different runs. He still had hands to play so could of got to play on rather than be out.

    As stated  above i believe it was arrogance of hellmuth as he offered to run it twice then without prompting upped it to three then 4 times.

    Tim
  • edited August 2011
    If you saw Hellmuths history on running boards you'd perhaps see this differently.  It is not uncommon for Hellmuth to run boards an unfeasable amount of times.  This wasnt unusual for him.

    He has also been dettered from taking out insurance in hands by directors so upping the hand run is a simple way to reduce his variance. 

    Doesnt seem to matter what the guy does, people just love to attack him.  I dont see that he did a thing wrong, acting with class (for a change) vs the ridic suckouts.  How Tony G (and Negranue/Lakk to a lesser degree) come off as good guys here and Hellmuth comes off as the arrogant douc/he is beyond me.

    Snap call?  He 3bet aiof?

    Was good tv i guess though :p
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    If you saw Hellmuths history on running boards you'd perhaps see this differently.  It is not uncommon for Hellmuth to run boards an unfeasable amount of times.  This wasnt unusual for him. He has also been dettered from taking out insurance in hands by directors so upping the hand run is a simple way to reduce his variance.  Doesnt seem to matter what the guy does, people just love to attack him.  I dont see that he did a thing wrong, acting with class (for a change) vs the ridic suckouts.  How Tony G (and Negranue/Lakk to a lesser degree) come off as good guys here and Hellmuth comes off as the arrogant douc/he is beyond me. Snap call?  He 3bet aiof? Was good tv i guess though :p
    Posted by AMYBR
    Concur with that. Just because he's been bratty in the past doesn't make it right for the rest to gang up on him laughing and high-fiving. That just looked pathetic and I felt sorry for PH. He handled it better than I would have in his shoes. Also didn't think he slow-rolled the loose cannon either.

    How would G have reacted if Phil had started laughing and high-fiving Negreanu when he (DN) housed his AK straight on the river?

    Pretty funny hand nonetheless, but the reaction stunk of schoolyard behaviour IMO.
  • edited August 2011
    the thing that gets me is why o why would u run it 4 times lol is phil hellmuth crazy hes like 95 per cent to win it normally why give the other guy a chance and run it 4 times just stupid hes own mistake and he should get stick for it for slow rolling and doing the oscars speech before he goes all in
  • edited August 2011
    I think what wound me up about this was mainly Negranue.  From what I have seen and from stories from people I know that have played him he really is the ambassador that he appears to be.

    All I could think watching this episode was how bad he runs in HSP seasons 1,2 and 3.  Where he keeps flopping straights and getting boated or quaded by river.  Just strongly felt that if someone had acted the way he did in those pots then it would clearly be out of order, him being the first to say so.

    Hellmuth isnt perfect.  He is a brat, but he kind have has earned the right to be.  Like it or not he is the most accomplished Tournament poker player in history, fact I'm afraid.  So when he is being "Hellmuthian" it is coming from a genuine standpoint.

    It is very true that he conducts himself badly at times.  I think its borne out of the frustration of not getting the credit and respect that he does infact deserve, conversely though it is his attitude and personality that prevent him getting said respect. 

    You have to take the guy with a pin..... bag of salt.  Much of what you see is a performance IMO.  He wants people to go after him.  Its how he gets paid.

    But Negranue/Laak and G's conduct would not have been toterated if it was someone else in the pot.

    Also like it or not Hellmuth is great for poker, always has been.

    You can read more at the IthinkPHellmuthisadoucheylegend.com :p
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    the thing that gets me is why o why would u run it 4 times lol is phil hellmuth crazy hes like 95 per cent to win it normally why give the other guy a chance and run it 4 times just stupid hes own mistake and he should get stick for it for slow rolling and doing the oscars speech before he goes all in
    Posted by angie6108
    I honestly thought he ran it 4 times to give the guy a chance not to go bust.

    And it's moot, to say the least, that it even was a slow-roll.

    As an aside, although he plays up to his persona a lot, almost every pro I've heard talk of Helmuth says he's a total gent away from the table. I doubt the same could be said about TonyG. Negreanu's always struck me as somewhat false too.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5:
    In Response to Re: Cash game on Channel 5 : I honestly thought he ran it 4 times to give the guy a chance not to go bust. And it's moot, to say the least, that it even was a slow-roll. As an aside, although he plays up to his persona a lot, almost every pro I've heard talk of Helmuth says he's a total gent away from the table. I doubt the same could be said about TonyG. Negreanu's always struck me as somewhat false too.
    Posted by bandini
    How "nice" can an ex-pool hustler be huh? :p
Sign In or Register to comment.