You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Thoughts on High Stakes Players

edited September 2011 in Poker Chat
Just considering, say, online cash tables, it is obvious that at the lower stakes there will be lots of casual players, fish, gamblers, etc, from which to win money off over a period of time.

However, one would presume that the players playing high stakes are, on the whole, going to be accomplished or professional players. Players playing at that level must presumably be winning money over a period of time, or else why would they play at such high stakes?

But if these 'top' players all make money over time at these levels, then who are they making their money from? They can't all be making profits from each other.

Are there still poor players with more money than sense that try their hand at these levels? Or perhaps do they feed off players moving up to higher levels who are not (yet) quite up to scratch?

Comments

  • edited September 2011
    This is something I often wonder myself. So I can't give any answers to you but I look forward to hearing the answers of some of the more experienced players.

    I can only assume that say the people winning at (for example) 100NL are winning from some regular 50NL players who are taking a shot at a higher level and so on up the levels.


  • edited September 2011
    Theres donkeys at every level, i've seen play at 100nl and upwards obv that would go in a game where you win if you lose your chips first
  • edited September 2011
    I,d say its down to ppls bankrolls

    To some ppl who play poker for fun a few hundred pounds is nothing to them,

    If i won the lottery tommmorw i,d play at the high stakes - I,d get beat over time but would relish playing the best players and would try to learn off them

    having said that you do see on Mastercash 6 regs sitting togethor at high levels which I don,t understand but theres normally 1 or 2 who are gonna be recreational players with plenty of money who can afford to lose it
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Thoughts on High Stakes Players:
    Just considering, say, online cash tables, it is obvious that at the lower stakes there will be lots of casual players, fish, gamblers, etc, from which to win money off over a period of time. However, one would presume that the players playing high stakes are, on the whole, going to be accomplished or professional players. Players playing at that level must presumably be winning money over a period of time, or else why would they play at such high stakes? But if these 'top' players all make money over time at these levels, then who are they making their money from? They can't all be making profits from each other. Are there still poor players with more money than sense that try their hand at these levels? Or perhaps do they feed off players moving up to higher levels who are not (yet) quite up to scratch?
    Posted by Pysterman
    One of the greatest all time poker players once said " We are just all holding Iveys money its just a matter of time before he gets it all" 10 points to any one who knows who stated that.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: Thoughts on High Stakes Players:
     We are just all holding Iveys money its just a matter of time before he gets it all" 10 points to any one who knows who stated that.
    Posted by -ACERAG-

    Was it the CEO of Full Tilt ?
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Thoughts on High Stakes Players:
    Just considering, say, online cash tables, it is obvious that at the lower stakes there will be lots of casual players, fish, gamblers, etc, from which to win money off over a period of time. However, one would presume that the players playing high stakes are, on the whole, going to be accomplished or professional players. Players playing at that level must presumably be winning money over a period of time, or else why would they play at such high stakes? But if these 'top' players all make money over time at these levels, then who are they making their money from? They can't all be making profits from each other. Are there still poor players with more money than sense that try their hand at these levels? Or perhaps do they feed off players moving up to higher levels who are not (yet) quite up to scratch?
    Posted by Pysterman
    this is not the case thankfully, there are plenty of poor players at all levels. There are a decent amount of recreational players at the higher levels, some people take shots and fail. Also all regs are not made equal.
  • edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: Thoughts on High Stakes Players:
    In Response to Re: Thoughts on High Stakes Players :  We are just all holding Iveys money its just a matter of time before he gets it all " 10 points to any one who knows who stated that. Posted by -ACERAG-
    Was it the CEO of Full Tilt ?
    Posted by BLACK_MASS

    lol

    In answer to OP. They probably make their money of drunken half-wits like me and persons whom, for whatever reason and however temporarily, similarly believe that either money's not important, they're better than they think they are or it's all a bit of a laugh really. At times I've been guilty of all three and on occasion even all three at once. Sigh. 
  • edited September 2011
    One word, Jamie Gold.

    Tging is if you were playing in the big game regularly would you simply sop if the dges evened out?  Probably not.  Love of the game plays a big part.  Competiteveness also
Sign In or Register to comment.