Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
£22 DEEPIE VERY EARLY STAGES AND FLOPPED A MONSTER - please discuss
I have just played this hand in the £22 7:30 deepie. It was 5 hands in and first level. Battle of the blinds and I flop a full house. I bet out and Player X dwelled, typed in chat " you dont have an ace" and folded. He later said that he folded JJ.
2 questions....
Did i play it wrong to lead out so early in a deepie with such a monster?
Would you have folded JJ in his position because I know I would have called / raised in his spot.
phil12uk | Small blind | | 10.00 | 10.00 | 5120.00 |
PLAYER X | Big blind | | 20.00 | 30.00 | 4930.00 |
| Your hole cards | | | | |
makapaka | Fold | | | | |
LEON1 | Fold | | | | |
Uzi_lover | Fold | | | | |
phil12uk | Raise | | 60.00 | 90.00 | 5060.00 |
PLAYER X | Call | | 50.00 | 140.00 | 4880.00 |
Flop |
---|
| | | | | |
phil12uk | Bet | | 70.00 | 210.00 | 4990.00 |
PLAYER X | Fold | | | | |
phil12uk | Show | | | | |
phil12uk | Win | | 210.00 | | 5200.00 |
0 ·
Comments
He's called your raise pre-flop.
With big pairs, you might well expect him to re-raise pre-flop so you could easily put him on a reasonable ace.
If he has the ace you get good action and you want to get chips in at the earliest opportunity to make a monster pot. If he outdraws you with a better FH, that's unlucky.
However, in this spot I think I'm check calling the flop & then leading out on the turn. He's called your pre flop raise so I would figure that there's a decent chance he's got an ace & if not he might try and represent?
If I hit the underfull I overbet the pot in a big way. If he's got a big ace you can break him, if he hasn't you're not usually going to get a dime out of him anyway. I'd have bet 400 into that 140 pot with the intention of getting all 5000 of his chips if he's got an ace.
As for the second part - if he folded JJ in that situation, I'd be surprised. He should have taken a card off for just 70, for if he hit he would get all 5,000 of your chips. Again reinforcing that the 70 bet was a bit off.
As for you leading out, fine, after his call you'd probably put him on ace rag at least.
Scotty "4-2 man" as I mockingly call him - gets derided now & then for his creative & unconventional game, but I tell you what - he understands - really understands - the game at a deep Level.
Post of the Week for me.
Note, by the bye, that Scotty's diagnosis was exactly what Phil12uK - a successful, good, thinking player - did. He flopped a House, OOP, & bet out, thus disguising beautifully his hand.
THAT was a great play, imo, & it would have whooshed 95% of Players, because they don't think these things through, & analyse them.
I would have been going for all his stack with that hand and the 70 bet gives a hand like JJ (the one the villain claimed) 70/1 implied odds to spike the jack while not giving the 88 the chance to get all 5000 of his chips.
It's getting that balance right between betting just the right amount to keep your punter, & confuse him with the bet, & over-egging our Bet & losing him.