well after my first session today, I know 3bb with 10s pre isn't enough. Called by 52off who hit a 5 and called my reraise allin on the 8 high rainbow flop! lol! limited experience but my table was more agressive but that seemed to be the only difference.
well after my first session today, I know 3bb with 10s pre isn't enough. Called by 52off who hit a 5 and called my reraise allin on the 8 high rainbow flop! lol! limited experience but my table was more agressive but that seemed to be the only difference. Posted by walesboy
Surely that's a dream situation. You raise with a big pair, they hit 1pr (lower than yours) and stack off?
Whenever I play usually 4x UTG and UTG +1 in full table then 3x everywhere else, especially if it's folded round to button no point opening for 5x if you're doing it light, well unless you know someone will call a big raise and you have a big hand.
In Response to Re: NL4 V NL8 : Surely that's a dream situation. You raise with a big pair, they hit 1pr (lower than yours) and stack off? Posted by Lambert180
I agree it was! just not the outcome!! Another 5 on the turn!LOL
NL4 hands: 10402 Profit in big blinds per 100 hands: 20
NL8 hands: 2136 Profit in big blinds per 100 handsL -9
I know that 2000 hands isn't a massive amount but I definitely believe that NL8 plays tougher (or less easy, as some player would no doubt say).
I'm still trying to adjust my NL4 game to NL8, and so far failing.
The main difference I find is that less players will make big raises, shoves or calls with marginal hands. I am struggling to get out of the NL4 mentality whrere I don't believe the player has the hand. At NL4 I tend to be right often enough to turn a decent profit. (Obviously, I still blow my stack every now and then, running into a big hidden hand like a set.) At NL8, they seem to have the goods a lot more frequently.
I need to start being more disciplined and respectful of big re-raises (unless I have reads indicating otherwise).
My stats since playing cash... NL4 hands: 10402 Profit in big blinds per 100 hands: 20 NL8 hands: 2136 Profit in big blinds per 100 handsL -9 I know that 2000 hands isn't a massive amount but I definitely believe that NL8 plays tougher (or less easy, as some player would no doubt say). I'm still trying to adjust my NL4 game to NL8, and so far failing. The main difference I find is that less players will make big raises, shoves or calls with marginal hands. I am struggling to get out of the NL4 mentality whrere I don't believe the player has the hand. At NL4 I tend to be right often enough to turn a decent profit. (Obviously, I still blow my stack every now and then, running into a big hidden hand like a set.) At NL8, they seem to have the goods a lot more frequently. I need to start being more disciplined and respectful of big re-raises (unless I have reads indicating otherwise). Posted by Pysterman
How do you find out how many hands you have played at a certain level?
Im a 100nl reg on stars playing as my wifes name helen_gamble
since moving here i play less on stars due to the time i can play now.
i have nothing to prove but if i can be bothered to play at 20nl i will come play you
BTW i stand by my post 4nl and 8nl are fish stakes and i have yet to see anyone decent at lower than 100nl which by the way im running at 14bb/100 over 5k hands so i m crushing that level too
Comments
limited experience but my table was more agressive but that seemed to be the only difference.
don't know if that sort of thing is usual for nl8 as well as nl4
from the above i think it is
should be fun
NL4 hands: 10402
Profit in big blinds per 100 hands: 20
NL8 hands: 2136
Profit in big blinds per 100 handsL -9
I know that 2000 hands isn't a massive amount but I definitely believe that NL8 plays tougher (or less easy, as some player would no doubt say).
I'm still trying to adjust my NL4 game to NL8, and so far failing.
The main difference I find is that less players will make big raises, shoves or calls with marginal hands. I am struggling to get out of the NL4 mentality whrere I don't believe the player has the hand. At NL4 I tend to be right often enough to turn a decent profit. (Obviously, I still blow my stack every now and then, running into a big hidden hand like a set.) At NL8, they seem to have the goods a lot more frequently.
I need to start being more disciplined and respectful of big re-raises (unless I have reads indicating otherwise).
tbh first sign of decent players is 100nl so just play within your roll
Posted by Brian666
LOL - a 20nl reg
why?
Im a 100nl reg on stars playing as my wifes name helen_gamble
since moving here i play less on stars due to the time i can play now.
i have nothing to prove but if i can be bothered to play at 20nl i will come play you
BTW i stand by my post 4nl and 8nl are fish stakes and i have yet to see anyone decent at lower than 100nl which by the way im running at 14bb/100 over 5k hands so i m crushing that level too
que all the haters..................
thats how i know i have played 5400 hands since 8th oct when i joined sky and that im runnning at 14bb/100
btw BB isnt big blinds its big bets
1 x BB equals 2 big blinds so 14bb is 28 big blinds per 100 hands
to work it out you simply do this
Profit divided by the Big Blind you are playing = x
x / 2 = Big Bets
Big bets x 100 divided by total number hands played at that level
= BB/100
thats how you judge a good player from a donk and a great player from a fish
4bb is solid over 250k hands
anything above that and you are owning
most winning regs are at 2bb