virtual players??

igimc

This guy was raising nearly every hand with
rubbish,then when ppl were re-raising him or
even going all-in he was still calling then hitting
runner runner to win the hand.
Mine was the third bounty he had took in this
way.
I scoped him,thinking he must be down thousands
playing like that,only to find out he's 9K up.
Makes me wonder if he actually exists.
richar1974 Small blind  20.00 20.00 1870.00 RJJG Big blind  40.00 60.00 3750.00  Your hole cards Q A    CJ111 Raise  120.00 180.00 2175.00 SwineFlu Fold     billtackle Call  120.00 300.00 2990.00 igimc Call  120.00 420.00 2000.00 richar1974 Fold     RJJG Fold     Flop  4 Q 2    CJ111 Bet  240.00 660.00 1935.00 billtackle Call  240.00 900.00 2750.00 igimc All-in  2000.00 2900.00 0.00 CJ111 Fold     billtackle Call  1760.00 4660.00 990.00 billtackle Show Q 9    igimc Show Q A    Turn  5    River  8    billtackle Win Flush to the Queen 4660.00  5650.00

DOHHHHHHH

He's a regular in my hyper turbo HU sngs, at various levels.

Might explain him wanting to play too many hands.

Decent HU player, but don't recall him being that much up @ them so must have had a few big MTT wins on sky. 

DAVEYZZ

ha ha ha..........you really need to stop playing!

TWISTED290

Iv heard of this happening alot

EvilPingu

3-bet (possibly even 3-bet shove for value) pre-flop.

igimc

Thanks for your input and poker advice(even if your 

probable not qualified to give it).But this isn't the poker

clinic,and i wasn't asking where i went wrong,if in fact i did.

   Even if i did do what it says in your book,he would have 

still called and still won,FACT.

  My point was about how his play and his stats didn't add up.

pod1

i dont understand why you think this player doesnt exist, obviously he/she does. he hits top pair gets jammed on and has 13 bigs behind. just dont see how you can correlate a players level or existence by playing them in 1 mtt. can you elaborate your thinking please.

baggs

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

ha ha ha..........you really need to stop playing!
Posted by DAVEYZZ

wow you need to stop posting!

igimc

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

i dont understand why you think this player doesnt exist, obviously he/she does. he hits top pair gets jammed on and has 13 bigs behind. just dont see how you can correlate a players level or existence by playing them in 1 mtt. can you elaborate your thinking please.
Posted by pod1

It wasn't just this hand,it was every hand he played.

I just couldn't understand how someone playing like

this could be 9k up,unless like in this mtt he is the

luckiest SOB on the planet.

  Now i assume he must exist but still can't 

correlate(good word btw)his play with his stats.

JasonKing9

Do you think this is a personal bot or a bot owned by sky?  If it was personal bot no one would program it to play this style and if you think it is a sky owned bot that knows the result before entering a hand that would mean that sky would lose their gambling license as this would be way to hard to hide from the regulators.

unknown_username

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

Do you think this is a personal bot or a bot owned by sky?  If it was personal bot no one would program it to play this style and if you think it is a sky owned bot that knows the result before entering a hand that would mean that sky would lose their gambling license as this would be way to hard to hide from the regulators.
Posted by JasonKing9

This is the funniest comment I've read in here for ages ..... bravo!!!

pod1

it is a good word isnt it. coagulate is another that just rolls uff the tongue, but im strugglin to use it in the post. 

what type of tourny was this?, obviously early doors looking at blind levels, maybe just playing loosy goosy and hoping for a double up. could be his partner playing on his account. might just be tilting from previous game.

looks like a major leak in his game, well end up bleeding money soon ,unless he coagulates this leak.(nope didnt quite work:-(  )

JasonKing9

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

In Response to Re: virtual players?? : This is the funniest comment I've read in here for ages ..... bravo!!!
Posted by elsadog

Why would sky want to lose its site that is always bringing in cash just to steal a few measly quid and if its so bad why are you still here.  Micheal Jackson is still alive he faked his own death!!!

JasonKing9

Why would anyone make a donk bot it dont make sense

pod1

dont dis the dog jason !!

DAVEYZZ

i think igimc is a virtual poster!(he always disagrees with me)

mickgil75

YOU  hear players say donks get rewarded,it was probly one of them.ur day will come igimc,gl....lol

igimc

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

i think igimc is a virtual poster!(he always disagrees with me)
Posted by DAVEYZZ

No i don't.

DAVEYZZ

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

In Response to Re: virtual players?? : No i don't.
Posted by igimc

unknown_username

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

In Response to Re: virtual players?? : Why would sky want to lose its site that is always bringing in cash just to steal a few measly quid and if its so bad why are you still here.  Micheal Jackson is still alive he faked his own death!!!
Posted by JasonKing9

It's funny because you set the 'regulators' on such a high pedestal - the same regulators who stood by while all the Full Tilt players lost every cent of their money. The same regulators who failed to discover Super-user accounts that fleeced millions of $$ from the players. The same regulators who stood by when iPoker refused to release the funds belonging to players - because they were winning too much.

Do your homework next time  ;o)

pod1

told you, dont mess with the dog :-)

unknown_username

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

told you, dont mess with the dog :-)
Posted by pod1

woof!!

pod1

thats my boy!! lol

chipsta

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

Do you think this is a personal bot or a bot owned by sky?  If it was personal bot no one would program it to play this style and if you think it is a sky owned bot that knows the result before entering a hand that would mean that sky would lose their gambling license as this would be way to hard to hide from the regulators.
Posted by JasonKing9

hahahahahahahahahahahaha yeah right lmao x2..even Di ck Turpin wore a mask,i think the sky logo should wear one too...total set up and ive just played my last game on here and it looks like plenty have the same idea..good luck.

unknown_username

In Response to Re: virtual players??:

thats my boy!! lol
Posted by pod1

have a rumage round the site for skys gaming licence!!! Thinkyou will find its expired!!!

pod1

i bet you your br it hasnt lol

unknown_username

Think you'll find it's dated 2009 - or it was until very recently. Does say somewhere that it has to be renewed 'regularly' or something to that effect. Not sure if it's renewable annually - and can't be @rsed to look TBH  )