You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Taking Shots

edited April 2012 in The Poker Clinic
Quick question: How many buy-ins should I set aside for taking a shot at a higher level once my bankroll permits?

Comments

  • edited April 2012
    For me it would depend on my roll if i had 1k i would not stake more than 5%(as for taking shots at higher levels), if i had £100 i would happily stake ~10% or take shots at maybe ~20%. But generally its not a great idea once you have a decent roll, to gamble with less than 20bb (or with any roll if the losses would affect you)
  • edited April 2012

    DEPENDING ON BUY-IN FOR SATS I GENERALLY TRY TWICE AT THE LOWEST LEVEL. ALSO DEPENDNG ON B/ROLL AND BUY-IN FOR SEMI (DEPENDANT ON BUYIN AMOUNT), I MIGHT BUY-IN FOR THAT ( BUT RARE ) I`M A NIT WITH MY MONEY.

  • edited April 2012
    depends how i feel/ playing. if i am playing nl 30 and have a roll of 700 say i will allow myself 3 bins at nl 40. my prob is when i have a few good sessions i think i can move and stay up there. when does taking shots become your playing level????
  • edited April 2012
    In Response to Taking Shots:
    Quick question: How many buy-ins should I set aside for taking a shot at a higher level once my bankroll permits?
    Posted by Wilhelm
    IS THIS A CASH OR MTT QUESTION ??

    AS I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE MTT THAN CASH
  • edited April 2012
    I think taking shots is pointless if you're a consistent 20/30NL player
    I'd only take shots if you're purely playing for enjoyment and if you lose money you wouldn't care, in your situation pod, I'd continue playing 20/30nl until you've beat that level over a long period of time, i.e. at least 3 months! and then move up
  • edited April 2012
    In Response to Re: Taking Shots:
    In Response to Taking Shots : IS THIS A CASH OR MTT QUESTION ?? AS I THOUGHT YOU WERE MORE MTT THAN CASH
    Posted by spornybol
    This is for cash.  I'm currently trying what I consider to be aggressive bankroll management.  I'm close to having 20 BIs for the next level of cash and my plan is to drop down as soon as I fall a penny below 20 BIs for that level. 
  • edited April 2012
    if you have 20 BI for level above take a shot, if u fall below 15BI then drop down :) thats aggressive strat gl
  • edited April 2012
    over the last yr to 18mnths i havnt really had a problem with these 2 levels percival, its where i have made my money to be able to play 40/50 (and the odd shot at 100). but getting crushed at 50 is killing me, hence why i do try and take the odd shot now and again so as it isnt such a jump next time i move up.
  • edited April 2012
    id keep 40BI for ur current level, and set aside 5 BI for ur shot take, so (50bi) all together (nitty?), and just jump str8 in and 4/5-table the new level, then if u lose the 5BI, drop down, start again...i wouldnt really recommend mixing say 3-tabling nl10 and 2-tabling nl20....but thats just me
  • edited April 2012
    im the king of taking shots i tell people u shouldnt play unless u have 20 buy ins so £200 = 10 nl i give good advice but i never do the same im trying to cut down taking shots because u are playing with scared monay and scared money never wins i used to play 50 nl with 200 br is really bad but never again but generally 20 buy is ok i think 
  • edited April 2012
    When you're taking shots you're scared money, and when you're scared money you can't play your best, therefore in my opinion 1 shot is 1 too many.

    The only kind of shot i take, or would take, is to sit down at one level above with the money i would normaly be putting down on the lower level, therefore less blinds

    e.g NL20 player sits at NL30 with £20 but each to his own, I'm sure some players have sat down at a lot bigger tables and managed to spin it up
Sign In or Register to comment.