Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
I occasionally hear players on this site talking about studying hand histories. This is something I know I should be doing but I hardly ever do, besides posting the occasional hand in the Poker Clinic, so a few questions:
1) Do you have to spend time studying hand histories to become a better player, or is it enough to discuss hands in the Poker Clinic, watch training videos, etc?
2) How much time should be given to this? Obviously how many hand histories you have depends on how much you play, but should it be a fixed amount of time every day, or does it depend how much I play?
3) Should you read every single hand history, even the standard hands where you raise with Aces on the button and everyone folds? Or is it better to make note of any interesting hand IDs throughout a session and only read them?
0 ·
Comments
I find there tends to be hands I recall from the night before. These are usually (but not always) exit hands! :-( I ALWAYS have a look at these and try and see if I could have done anything better. I also spend a bit of time reading the clinic and posting any hands I'm not sure of. The clinic is excellent in making me realise that there are MANY ways to act in a given situation.
plus
any hands where I wasn't sure at the time what line to take
Sometime I'll find all cash hands where I had lost a certain amount />x and see if there are any leaks/spew
Also (although this doesn't really apply to me as I'm currently playing smaller stakes) I know it can be advantageous to discuss hands with regs and people who know a lot about the game, as flaws and leaks in your game might be highlighted. Doing this could also help you to develop counter-strategies and be one step ahead in the metagame!