You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Poker on 4 with Hartigan.

edited May 2012 in Poker Chat
A guy tripple barrels Liv Boeree,  she calls the river.

He says you got it, and mucks his hand.

She scoops the pot and the hand ends without her turning her cards over, 

isn't this just an easy way for players to collude .?

Comments

  • edited May 2012
    When i was at UKIPT i was tripple barreled and was told i had to show to claim the pot the guy also insta mucked his hand, i had to show my Ace high that i hero called with.

    I want to see clarification here. Both tournys run by same people, and i have to show and Liv doesnt. Sigh
  • edited May 2012
    mmmmmm you have to show to claim but if oppo mucks and doesn't show then the pot is yours by default

  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    When i was at UKIPT i was tripple barreled and was told i had to show to claim the pot the guy also insta mucked his hand, i had to show my Ace high that i hero called with. I want to see clarification here. Both tournys run by same people, and i have to show and Liv doesnt. Sigh
    Posted by The_Don90
    thats strange because at the same UKIPT tournie I called someone down who then insta mucked and I didn't ahve to show my hand
  • edited May 2012
    surley if your the caller then its exactly that! you are calling to see there hand and they must show!

    just watched it and yes collusion could be possible here. Was very strange, or was it because she was all in and he was the shover that he didnt have to show because she couldnt reraise him at that point? if she had chips left would it be a different story?
  • edited May 2012
    boree called to see his cards, he mucked
    if u call and they fold/muck then it's the same thing - you don't have to show



  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    [QUOTE]boree called to see his cards, he mucked if u call and they fold/muck then it's the same thing - you don't have to show
    Posted by rancid

    but players used to use the term 'ill see you'. Did this term stop and just 'call' used because of the reason above.

    how can it be the same thing.
  • edited May 2012
    You have to love Hartigan and Stapelton as commentators.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    You have to love Hartigan and Stapelton as commentators.
    Posted by AMYBR
    ive dropped many hints to James, that i think Mr Stapleton is looking tired.  I think he should be replaced by an amusing , good looking Scotsman, with a keen intellect and great understanding of the nuances of Poker.

    I'm expecting my ticket to the bahamas to arrive any day now ;o)
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : ive dropped many hints to James, that i think Mr Stapleton is looking tired.  I think he should be replaced by an amusing , good looking Scotsman, with a keen intellect and great understanding of the nuances of Poker. I'm expecting my ticket to the bahamas to arrive any day now ;o)
    Posted by JockBMW
    thanks pete




  • edited May 2012
    From the GPTL rules (which apply to all EPT and UKIPT tournaments):

    51. Winning hand - A player must show all of their cards to collect the pot. This includes playing the board. If there is only one player remaining with cards, they do not have to show a winning hand to collect the pot. For example, player B bets the river and player A calls. Player B then mucks leaving player A as the only player remaining in the pot with cards. Player A then collects the pot without having to show his or her hand.


  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : ive dropped many hints to James, that i think Mr Stapleton is looking tired.  I think he should be replaced by an amusing , good looking Scotsman, with a keen intellect and great understanding of the nuances of Poker. I'm expecting my ticket to the bahamas to arrive any day now ;o)
    Posted by JockBMW
    :)

    Lol yeah he does look a bit like Matt Cardle performing in front of millions these days :p

    Genuinely think I enjoy the banter more than the show lately.  Poker on the radio ftw :p

    Def the A team :p
  • edited May 2012

    i am sure james won't be reading these posts (professional modesty and with far better things to do with his time) but, yes, he and jon are superb and make a poker programme that can be watched twice.

    my favourite line was from last year....

    james, "it must be nice to have your brother come and rail you."
    jon, "my brother's an idiot."



     
  • edited May 2012
    lol there are so many tbf.

    Never liked victor Ramdin anyway.  Suspect was a bit of a hero call from Boree too.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : thats strange because at the same UKIPT tournie I called someone down who then insta mucked and I didn't ahve to show my hand
    Posted by scotty77
    One thing i noticed was dealer inconsistancy at this tourny, may account for it. Tbh i wasnt arguing that late into the night.

    Situation of dealer consistancy invovles the no mobile phones at the table. As you probably know No mobile phones. fair enough. Im a regular tweeter when playing live. However i found that to most dealers if your not in the hand dont bother and are fine with it. However late in the day between hands we got a new dealer first hand he goes to deal im posting a small tweet. Although i am also big blind. I had a quick tweet to post and was quickly doing this over the dealer change over. First card dealt before i even have one card im told to put my phone away. I do and just assume its because id now have a card. However 2 hands later theres a raise and 3bet from EP i fold my BTN and start finnishing my tweet. I get another warning. Confused about it i just didnt tweet in this dealers spell. When the next dealer came i asked for clarification he said if your not in a hand no worries. Same as it had been all day.

    Although this is talking about the same tourny again where the board reads 22227 and opponent shows 88 and i show K7 and had to call floor to win the pot.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    surley if your the caller then its exactly that! you are calling to see there hand and they must show! just watched it and yes collusion could be possible here. Was very strange, or was it because she was all in and he was the shover that he didnt have to show because she couldnt reraise him at that point? if she had chips left would it be a different story?
    Posted by Dazler
    One thing i did notice at the UKIPT regards to this makes sense. One guy bet river the other guy called i cant mind who mucked but the other guy said "i want to see his cards" dealer said upon calling you have to declare you want to see the cards.

    Obviously this meant later on there was alot of "i want to see what you have" before saying the word "call" and people including myself even started using that line to get live tells on certain players.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : One thing i noticed was dealer inconsistancy at this tourny, may account for it. Tbh i wasnt arguing that late into the night. Situation of dealer consistancy invovles the no mobile phones at the table. As you probably know No mobile phones. fair enough. Im a regular tweeter when playing live. However i found that to most dealers if your not in the hand dont bother and are fine with it. However late in the day between hands we got a new dealer first hand he goes to deal im posting a small tweet. Although i am also big blind. I had a quick tweet to post and was quickly doing this over the dealer change over. First card dealt before i even have one card im told to put my phone away. I do and just assume its because id now have a card. However 2 hands later theres a raise and 3bet from EP i fold my BTN and start finnishing my tweet. I get another warning. Confused about it i just didnt tweet in this dealers spell. When the next dealer came i asked for clarification he said if your not in a hand no worries. Same as it had been all day. Although this is talking about the same tourny again where the board reads 22227 and opponent shows 88 and i show K7 and had to call floor to win the pot.
    Posted by The_Don90
    DTD obviously has its own tournament rules, which the dealing staff are used to following.

    When staging a UKIPT, suddenly the dealers are expected to enforce the GPTL regulations (which contain a fair few quirks and unique rules), so it's understandable there would be some "mistakes" and inconsistencies.

  • edited May 2012
    Yeah I watched this aswell, and as James has already posted, they did say straight after the hand that it's ruling that applies to EPTs that she didn't need to show her hand because he'd mucked.
  • edited May 2012
    I think its a pretty good habit to "attempt" to scoop a pot when oppo mucks in anycase.

    If staff call for a ruling its just an aside.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : DTD obviously has its own tournament rules, which the dealing staff are used to following. When staging a UKIPT, suddenly the dealers are expected to enforce the GPTL regulations (which contain a fair few quirks and unique rules), so it's understandable there would be some "mistakes" and inconsistencies.
    Posted by J-Hartigan
    Yeah James i have no complaints i love the UKIPT events and i also loved the DTD venue. I hope my posts arent comming across that i dislike them because thats certainly not the case. And obviously human error can come into play aswell as people interpet things differently.

    One rule can mean two things to two different people when worded the exact same. And for that reason we love so many different aspects of so many different games.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    [QUOTE]I think its a pretty good habit to "attempt" to scoop a pot when oppo mucks in anycase. If staff call for a ruling its just an aside.
    Posted by AMYBR


    It's also a habit that would get you a time-penalty or worse in any well-run Venue......

    Dealers award us the pot, we never take it until they do, for fear our hands will be, quite rightly, chopped off.
     
    I was in a Tourney once where Lord Numpty scooped in the Pot before it was awarded to him - wrongly. There had been THREE all-ins involved, & the Tourney had to be suspended for 45 minutes while the pot was re-constructed to everyone's satisfaction. Not an easy ask,. given that in these spots, all three players exaggarated their claimed chip stack pre-hand......

    The kid got a 1 hour pernalty though, to everyone's great satisfaction. Short of total disqualification, that's the longest time-penalty at the Table I have ever seen. Quite right too. I'd have had him taken outside and shot. I think he thought he was playing pub poker, where, of course, it is the default.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : [QUOTE ]I think its a pretty good habit to "attempt" to scoop a pot when oppo mucks in anycase. If staff call for a ruling its just an aside. Posted by AMYBR
    It's also a habit that would get you a time-penalty or worse in any well-run Venue...... Dealers award us the pot, we never take it until they do, for fear our hands will be, quite rightly, chopped off.   I was in a Tourney once where Lord Numpty scooped in the Pot before it was awarded to him - wrongly. There had been THREE all-ins involved, & the Tourney had to be suspended for 45 minutes while the pot was re-constructed to everyone's satisfaction. Not an easy ask,. given that in these spots, all three players exaggarated their claimed chip stack pre-hand...... The kid got a 1 hour pernalty though, to everyone's great satisfaction. Short of total disqualification, that's the longest time-penalty at the Table I have ever seen. Quite right too. I'd have had him taken outside and shot. I think he thought he was playing pub poker, where, of course, it is the default.
    Posted by Tikay10

    1 hour :O longest ive seen was a 2 round sit out and that for for a villian acting out of turn 6 times.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : [QUOTE ]I think its a pretty good habit to "attempt" to scoop a pot when oppo mucks in anycase. If staff call for a ruling its just an aside. Posted by AMYBR
    It's also a habit that would get you a time-penalty or worse in any well-run Venue...... Dealers award us the pot, we never take it until they do, for fear our hands will be, quite rightly, chopped off.   I was in a Tourney once where Lord Numpty scooped in the Pot before it was awarded to him - wrongly. There had been THREE all-ins involved, & the Tourney had to be suspended for 45 minutes while the pot was re-constructed to everyone's satisfaction. Not an easy ask,. given that in these spots, all three players exaggarated their claimed chip stack pre-hand...... The kid got a 1 hour pernalty though, to everyone's great satisfaction. Short of total disqualification, that's the longest time-penalty at the Table I have ever seen. Quite right too. I'd have had him taken outside and shot. I think he thought he was playing pub poker, where, of course, it is the default.
    Posted by Tikay10

    Pretty much meant verbally/mentally.  Oppo mucks we ought to know pot is rightfully ours.  I will never show my hand at showdown unless am forced to.  Countless times find selves in spot on river where we have (hero) called a bet and oppo mucks best hand, obv only realising it if cards are forced to be shown - which as we know varies from location to location.

    If oppo mucks his hand we have won.  Thats why I hate the rule.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : It's also a habit that would get you a time-penalty or worse in any well-run Venue...... Dealers award us the pot, we never take it until they do, for fear our hands will be, quite rightly, chopped off.   I was in a Tourney once where Lord Numpty scooped in the Pot before it was awarded to him - wrongly. There had been THREE all-ins involved, & the Tourney had to be suspended for 45 minutes while the pot was re-constructed to everyone's satisfaction. Not an easy ask,. given that in these spots, all three players exaggarated their claimed chip stack pre-hand...... The kid got a 1 hour pernalty though, to everyone's great satisfaction. Short of total disqualification, that's the longest time-penalty at the Table I have ever seen. Quite right too. I'd have had him taken outside and shot. I think he thought he was playing pub poker, where, of course, it is the default. Posted by Tikay10
    Pretty much meant verbally/mentally.  Oppo mucks we ought to know pot is rightfully ours.
    Posted by AMYBR

    Yeah I guessed as a seasoned live player that was what you meant.

    I mean if he's mucked, you've won regardless.
  • edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan.:
    In Response to Re: Poker on 4 with Hartigan. : Pretty much meant verbally/mentally.  Oppo mucks we ought to know pot is rightfully ours. Posted by AMYBR
    Yeah I guessed as a seasoned live player that was what you meant. I mean if he's mucked, you've won regardless.
    Posted by Lambert180

    Yeah sorry did edit.

    If your hand has showdown value..well it has showdown value lol.  If you muck, your hand should be dead by default.  Its no different from not protecting your hand from the dealer.  That responsibility falls on the individual player, just as mucking is an optional choice that ought to have a consequence.  People soon learn.
  • edited May 2012
    Indeed.

    I was playing a HU Hyper the other day, betting throughout the hand, then I checked to them on the river as I was playing the board and couldn't really bluff in that spot and he just open folded. Always nice when you're playing the board lol.
  • edited May 2012
    I remember one hand in particular in Hull.  I was just spewing in one particular hand vs a pretty lag guy.

    He ships river and I call with 2nd pr on pretty polarised board.  He says "I must be beat if you call" and LITERALLY throws his hand across the table just an inch or so short of the muck.

    I await for pot to be awarded by default.  Happy days.  Dealer retrieves his cards and plays it as a showdown. (2nd pr better kicker).

    That is the extreme end obv, but countless situations like it.  Plus just not wanting to show oppo/table your range unless we have to, which we comfortably oughtnt have to if oppo is bad enough to muck.

    Get the rule totally as there have been bad practices on the live circuit.  If only all poker players were upstanding citizens huh :p
Sign In or Register to comment.