I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?

IDONKCALLU

jukeSmall blind£0.10£0.10£8.00IDONKCALLUBig blind £0.20£0.30£40.36 Your hole cardsAQ   TeamMoneyFold    BAGGPUSSFold    lisamilw05Call £0.20£0.50£15.39jukeFold    IDONKCALLURaise £0.60£1.10£39.76lisamilw05Call £0.60£1.70£14.79Flop  JQ10   IDONKCALLUBet £1.00£2.70£38.76lisamilw05Call £1.00£3.70£13.79Turn  8   IDONKCALLUCheck    lisamilw05Check    River  7   IDONKCALLUBet £1.00£4.70£37.76lisamilw05Raise £3.85£8.55£9.94

Batkin88

No need to call here as so many hands beat yours, Bet fold is good on this river tbh

rancid

raise more pre
bet flop more
bet turn

a/p ez fold

simonnatur

have you considered how idcu's line with this hand appears to villain ?  (clue v. weak)

can you be certain they are not overvaluing a worse hand/bluffing ?

simonnatur

btw idcu,  I agree in this spot your 3 bet sizing is quite likely to create a multi way pot. I think you need to make it a bit bigger - aim is to get hds up with weak player right ?

IDONKCALLU

i went 80p rancid says 60p but it doesnt take my big blind into consideration isnt this standard 80p after 1 limper ?

IDONKCALLU

something didnt add up in the hand im thinking if opponent had a str8 they would bet the turn to get max value y would u check back the turn she obv think i have something as this smacks my range for a pre flop raiser 

pr1nnyraid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

btw idcu,  I agree in this spot your 3 bet sizing is quite likely to create a multi way pot. I think you need to make it a bit bigger - aim is to get hds up with weak player right ?
Posted by simonnatur

Do you mean raise sizing?

pr1nnyraid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

something didnt add up in the hand im thinking if opponent had a str8 they would bet the turn to get max value y would u check back the turn she obv think i have something as this smacks my range for a pre flop raiser 
Posted by IDONKCALLU

They might check back turn with a str8.. they might realise you arent going to call the turn and river with worse. Also you are more likely to fold your 1prs on the turn so may as well try and get you to c/c the river instead.

Why did you lead the river? You don't have many 9's in your range raising from the blinds and everyone knows that, now you might level yourself into a call. he could even do this with 2pr for value. I think the river is a c/f as played (at these stakes).

IDONKCALLU

like i said prinny was a block bet i didnt want to check and face over £2 bet so i bet and hope to get called 

rancid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

like i said prinny was a block bet i didnt want to check and face over £2 bet so i bet and hope to get called 
Posted by IDONKCALLU

ok suppose, make it £1.20 - punish limper - make em pay

IDONKCALLU

6 x raise who 6 x raises when 1 limper ? standard is 4 i was told every limp u 1 x raise extra so standard raise is 2 x if a limp then 3 x 2 limps 4 x n so on 

rancid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

6 x raise who 6 x raises when 1 limper ? standard is 4 i was told every limp u 1 x raise extra so standard raise is 2 x if a limp then 3 x 2 limps 4 x n so on 
Posted by IDONKCALLU

if you have a serial limp/caller then punish them, so easy to exploit their limp/calling range

pr1nnyraid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call? : if you have a serial limp/caller then punish them, so easy to exploit their limp/calling range
Posted by rancid

No need, even a bad player will adapt to this quickly and stop limping as wide. 4x is fine and will you can bloat the pot on later streets.

IDONKCALLU

thanks for ya advice guys much appreciated i posted hand on poker clinic hope they show 2moro and u shall see the result 

rancid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call? : No need, even a bad player will adapt to this quickly and stop limping as wide. 4x is fine and will you can bloat the pot on later streets.
Posted by pr1nnyraid

don't think bad players ever learn, sometimes they do flop good so for them it is enough to keep calling

donkeyplop

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call? : don't think bad players ever learn, sometimes they do flop good so for them it is enough to keep calling
Posted by rancid

I think you are better keeping your pre flop raises consistant, so I would say idku should have raised no more than 80p pre flop.

rancid

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call?:

In Response to Re: I put a block bet on river as i didnt want check fold but is this a call? : I think you are better keeping your pre flop raises consistant, so I would say idku should have raised no more than 80p pre flop.
Posted by donkeyplop

yeah probbaly, but we can still keep our pre raise size consistant versus bad limp/callers with all our range - may be exploited by other regs though but hey

scotty77

OOP I'd prob raise a bit more pre.

Bet fold river looks good tho.