You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

5-4-3-2-1 - MTT Debut at 3.15pm today - Comment in thread and play for bonus!

edited November 2012 in Poker Chat
need to fix the text in the lobby

he blind levels decrease each level from 5 minute to 1 minute blinds in this Turbo to Supersonic tournament. (3 places paid)
«1

Comments

  • edited November 2012
    ***  See here for details of the 5-4-3-2-1 MTT debut & giveaway! ***

    Hey all,

    We've put a trial format SnG up in the lobby which we'd like your feedback on. It's a new one for us and you can find it here:


    6 players, top 2 get paid and the blinds go from 5 minutes, to 4, etc etc. Currently just one of them in the lobby now (1.30pm), but we'll roll out more of them depending on how it's received.

    Let us know what you think about the game play, number of starting chips (more? less?) and any other comments you might have on it :)

    Thanks,
    Dave
  • edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format):
    need to fix the text in the lobby he blind levels decrease each level from 5 minute to 1 minute blinds in this Turbo to Supersonic tournament. (3 places paid)
    Posted by smarr
    Saw your other post on this in the forum - should be corrected already, along with the RR one :)

    Are you going to try the 54321?
  • edited November 2012
    was tempted but the lobby wasnt filling up so i gave up
  • edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format):
    was tempted but the lobby wasnt filling up so i gave up
    Posted by smarr
    No problem smarr - we've got 1 in there now so jump in and see if you can get the ball rolling ;)

    We've also applied a 65%-35% payout structure on the prizepool. What do you reckon?
  • edited November 2012
    2 people in there now, including DYM specialist JohnConnor... could be interesting!

    Edit: Three, Tintin now in the mix. Fill yer boots!
  • edited November 2012
    i'll give it a go since its a trial.
  • edited November 2012
    I'll give it a go Sky-Dave - just to get the ball rolling - I'm in
  • edited November 2012
    And we're off - good luck to:

    phoenix7705000  
    benjinicko5000  
    TINTIN5000  
    POKERTREV5000  
    JohnConnor5000  
    10l0l1i0T5000
  • edited November 2012
    All six players still in and we're down to the 1 minute blind levels now. Gulp!
  • edited November 2012
    Only watched the last few hands - looks fun.

    WP JC
  • edited November 2012
    Well it was certainly fun to watch!!
  • edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format):
    All six players still in and we're down to the 1 minute blind levels now. Gulp!
    Posted by Sky_Dave
    Anyone got any thoughts as to the optimal strategy in these? It will be totally "formulaic", like all SNG's, but it'll need tweaking for this sub-species.

    Suppose, to a degree, it depends upon the table dynamic.
     
  • edited November 2012
    bubbled as per:(

    its a bit of fun thats for sure. i like the 65-35 payout maybe that could be discussed about all sng
  • edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format):
    Only watched the last few hands - looks fun. WP JC
    Posted by VespaPX
    It was fun to watch - the strategy was interesting too as it looked like the deep stack left people biding their time. 

    Then the time ran out ;)
  • edited November 2012
    Do we want a few more of these this afternoon? And, guess what buy in levels we're going to set them up at....

    £1.
    £2.
    £3.
    £4.

    And....

    £5. 

    I am a genius sometimes ;)
  • edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format):
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format) : Anyone got any thoughts as to the optimal strategy in these? It will be totally "formulaic", like all SNG's, but it'll need tweaking for this sub-species. Suppose, to a degree, it depends upon the table dynamic.  
    Posted by Tikay10
    THe fact JC won it prob says a lot for the strategy? Be interested in JC's views.
  • edited November 2012
    i'll give another a go.

    who's joining me?
  • edited November 2012
    There's another £2 in the lobby for now, and TINTIN is sat there waiting. I actually wish I could play this one! :)
  • edited November 2012
    In. apologise in advance for random lag and potential slowrolls, lappy problems till 4pm!

    gl all.
  • edited November 2012
    Well that was fun - Need to have a word with the dealer though:)

    Wasn't sure how it would pan out but - The game lasted approx 20mins and certainly wasn't the shove fest I had expected, so I think peeps could find an edge in these.

    I would maybe start with a slightly bigger blind in level 1 as I certainly didn't feel any pressure to shove until we were a few mins into the 1min Blinds.

    Great Fun Though.

    I Still demand a refund though Sky_Dave - I mean 6 & 9 really? :) stop playing with the buttons lol 
  • edited November 2012
    I did not press any buttons. Apart from the 6 and the 9 ones on the top row.

    Did I do something wrong? :)

    And as for how they play, I actually think people should play more suited connectors/small pairs early doors, try bink a flop then go SUPER aggro. JC did that well - played snug and then hit the BAM button.


  • edited November 2012
    Blimey, this looks like a tough lineup! There's a UKOPS winner in there too!
     
    bearlyther5000
    VespaPX5000
    TINTIN5000
    Donald5000
    DOHHHHHHH5000
    Brrrrrrr5000
    GL Chaps!
  • edited November 2012

    Ok, played the first one so here's what I thought:

    1) On first sight in the lobby, the structure looked a little bit 'out there' to me, unlike anything I'd seen before. For that reason my initial reaction was that they were unlikely to prove popular. Sit and Go's that aren't HU or DYMs don't seem to do too well around here for some reason, anyway. That was just my initial reaction, though, and I had to give them a try before dismissing them (only fair, eh?)

    2) Having played it, I thought it was tremendous fun. I really think there is something there with this one. It will need lots of people to try them, then support them, for them to stay (as with anything, I guess). I think, possibly, a decent promo relating specifically to these, might be beneficial (or whichever of the new Sit and Go's currently in the lobby is 'run with', if any).

    3) Relating to the last point above, there are lots of new formats in the Sit and Go lobby right now. I kind of hope that this is like a trial period and that one or two will be taken on and run with for a while, depending on the trials. I think trying to keep all of these new formats would saturate the Sit and Go lobby too much. If these are short-term trials I think it's important that people try them out and provide feedback where they can.

    4) I wondered while playing if the format (blind structures) could be applied to DYMs (because DYMs are far more popular than standard pay out Sit and Go's on Sky). I kind of thought that it wouldn't alter DYM strategy too much and that this version was better.

    5) A specific one, as they are brand new I suspect some tweaking with the blind structure may be required before they become a finalised product (if they do). Personally, with 1 game's experience (lol), I'd recommend just scrapping the 30/60 level altogether and bring the other levels forward so that the 1 min blinds start when the blinds are 150/300. I think 5000 starting stack is good.

    6) The payout was 75/25. I think the 65/25 mentioned above (that they were meant to be?) would be a lot better. £2.70 for 2nd after paying £2.00 to buy-in would put off a lot of players I think.

    Overall, I think they are great to be honest and everyone in that game seemed to be having fun. I hope this one sticks, I think it could but it will just need work and support, that's all.

    EDIT: +1 to what Trev said. I think people could find an edge in these which adds to my belief that they could prove successful because they certainly look to provide the 'fun' element for recreational players.

  • edited November 2012
    Brilliant feedback JC. Thanks for that.

    Re: the payouts, they were meant to be 65/35 but the first went as 75/25 in the first - apologies to TINTIN for the confusion on my part. They will stay as 65/35 in future.

    Re: the blind levels, I think we'll try keep 30/60 in for now but can definitely review later. The thinking here is to let the 5k stacks play for as much time as possible before the time starts kicking in. Taking the 30/60 out might look natural but think might cause a pinch a little too soon. Again, totally up for review though so could be done if people felt the same way.

    We're going to trial this and a couple of other formats for a while and as you say run with the most popular ones. Up to you guys to decide really!
  • edited November 2012

    Bubbled the 2nd one. Got abit crazy. 


    I'd change it to 4 - 3 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2* or something. 


  • edited November 2012
    i won 1 so they are good:)

    from the ones i played all players were there till the 1 min blinds kicked in. i agree with JC that the 30/60 level isnt needed but cetrainly more needs to be played.

    hope these go well as there is certainly a fun factor to them for small stakes
  • edited November 2012
    Hope they go well too, TINTIN :)

    Re: the 30/60 level, I think we're going to let them run with it in for the weekend and take another look on Monday to see if people still want it taking out. That way some of the more recreational players can have a go on them. 

    Feel free to spread the word about them though if you like them - the more people play them, the more likely they'll stick around.
  • edited November 2012
    Just played one and it played fine for 3 levels

    I can't comment on how it goes after that, as I called off my 5k with KK vs TinTin's AA :(

    I presume rake will be 10% and not 11.11111111111111111111111% if and when these are rolled out? ;)
  • edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: 5-4-3-2-1 - Opinions please! (New SNG Format):
    Just played one and it played fine for 3 levels I can't comment on how it goes after that, as I called off my 5k with KK vs TinTin's AA :( I presume rake will be 10% and not 11.11111111111111111111111% if and when these are rolled out? ;)
    Posted by annie_duke

    It will most likely stay as is, Annie. Although I know that's not you really :)

  • edited November 2012
    Damn you kropotkin!
Sign In or Register to comment.