You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

NL1000 session, what do you think.....

edited February 2013 in Poker Chat
Just seen a couple of high stakes vids with a couple of known sky poker players (well at least one well known player) 

everyone advocates, 30 40 + BI's at most levels what about 9 bi's lol....



«1

Comments

  • edited February 2013
    What you think of the hand at 02.47 in not sure i like the idea of 4 bet folding aq if were not willing to get it in then surely we should be calling the 3bet imo as we turn aq into a bluff.

    Ive watched all of his videos tho there good to watch.
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    What you think of the hand at 02.47 in not sure i like the idea of 4 bet folding aq if were not willing to get it in then surely we should be calling the 3bet imo as we turn aq into a bluff. Ive watched all of his videos tho there good to watch.
    Posted by bearlyther
    say that when you are playing wayy over your roll and playing 200bigs lol, i think it is a correct fold its early in the session and they are too deep imo to get AQ in at this stage with no dynamics, so with that in mind calling the 3 bet may be better and playing a bit of post flop poker.
  • edited February 2013
    publicity for the Smit. Fame is on its way, Sir

    well, it is if you upload the f'in videos. fheiwofhiofhewiofhioewfhewfwhfhwof/

    ;-)
  • edited February 2013
    Yep agree think calling the 3bet is a lot better than 4 bet folding aq.
  • edited February 2013
    Im looking to upload 2 or 3 videos of me 8 tabling tournaments in the near future and putting it up on youtube.  Watch out for it then you can all berate my play!
  • edited February 2013
    Wow, could he be any more passive HU?
  • edited February 2013
    well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play?

    O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10?

    Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river? 

    taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger. 

    +1
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play? O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10? Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river?  taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger.  +1
    Posted by bolly580

    Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init
    Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap.



  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap.
    Posted by rancid
    haha style snaps its ...O..Odear haha. in all fairness K high was props best hand, shipping river just looked so boss.

  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play? O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10? Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river?  taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger.  +1
    Posted by bolly580
    lol this is me :/

    but very interesting heads up play, he must have been sweating so much when he shoved with K high haha 
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : lol this is me :/ but very interesting heads up play, he must have been sweating so much when he shoved with K high haha 
    Posted by sighcall
    nothing againt no one imparticular but it seems everyone frowns upon high stakes action on here..

    William Reynolds (high stakes pro) recent tweet..online MSNL used to consist of regs spewings buy-ins/shot taking/heads up battles.. now its a buncha nit boxes nit boxing 365 days a year

    exactly right
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : nothing againt no one imparticular but it seems everyone frowns upon high stakes action on here.. William Reynolds (high stakes pro) recent tweet.. online MSNL used to consist of regs spewings buy-ins/shot taking/heads up battles.. now its a buncha nit boxes nit boxing 365 days a year exactly right
    Posted by bolly580
    yeh im gutted there isnt any higher stakes diarys on here.

    As for that quote its possibly true but at the end of the day its their money and if being a nit is most profiitable then thats what they will do, and i dont blame them for that
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : yeh im gutted there isnt any higher stakes diarys on here. As for that quote its possibly true but at the end of the day its their money and if being a nit is most profiitable then thats what they will do, and i dont blame them for that
    Posted by sighcall
    basically all nits would of wona  ton and all now there all gutted everyone's wised up.

    IMO people are too stingy with there BR though, especially low stakes...people playing nl 4/8 will find the same crazy donators at 10/20nl if they look hard enough.

    TAKE A SHOT PEOPLE

  • edited February 2013
    I wasn't trying to have a go btw.

    The more action we get on the site the better, but that doesn't mean we can't comment on the play. There are some spots where I'd have been more aggro but obv it's easier to say when I play lower stakes so 1) can afford to be more aggro cos I can afford to lose BIs 2) my opponents aren't some of the best players on the site.

    Pretty ballsy thing to do from Smit
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    I wasn't trying to have a go btw. The more action we get on the site the better, but that doesn't mean we can't comment on the play. There are some spots where I'd have been more aggro but obv it's easier to say when I play lower stakes so 1) can afford to be more aggro cos I can afford to lose BIs 2) my opponents aren't some of the best players on the site. Pretty ballsy thing to do from Smit
    Posted by Lambert180
    judging from his vlogs his BR shot up recently, been smashing it.

    Really refreshing to see high stakes player keep a upto date vlog. Dont think he ever played in a casino I play 1/2 at G in sheff (that's where he from) like every other night. Nice to stack him they say PEAAAAAAAAAAAAACE
  • edited February 2013
    Is nit boxing greater than aggro kung fu fighting

    think Smit said he was laying down too much of a wide range pre, but he said he is not HU player
    I think he done ok, even though it's a very small amount of hands

    His thought process was deffo intresting
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap.
    Posted by rancid
    +1 ^^^^

    trying to get 1 up everyday is almost impossible though, dnt need to do that Smit if you're reading!

    1 a week that isn't delayed is the way forward imo, then extra ones if you have something u wanna vlog about!

    loved the "25 new ones will be up on Sunday" comment. Never short of ambition ;)

    I'll keep checking the vlog in anticipation!!! :D

    BINKINGGGGGGG IN A WINTER WONDERLAND!
  • edited February 2013
    Is it just me or does he sound like Dave Gorman???
    Gd video.
  • edited February 2013
    Bolly i sat at a 15.25 table with you the other day (higher than i normally play) and you instantly asked me why i would play you and said that as i'm a regular husng player surely i should look in the lobby and avoid names that i recognize or wudn't have an edge against basically hunt around for soft spots. So who is the real bolly some baller who takes shots? or some bunhunting nit who moans when a player who plays hu often sits at the same table.  Anyway thats the first time i have seen a sweat session of a skypoker player and i enjoyed it, but if people post videos then obviously they expect comments on there play regardless of what stakes.
  • edited February 2013
    I very much enjoyed his videos some interesting hands and his commentary was quite funny at times more please smitalos
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    Bolly i sat at a 15.25 table with you the other day (higher than i normally play) and you instantly asked me why i would play you and said that as i'm a regular husng player surely i should look in the lobby and avoid names that i recognize or wudn't have an edge against basically hunt around for soft spots. So who is the real bolly some baller who takes shots? or some bunhunting nit who moans when a player who plays hu often sits at the same table.  Anyway thats the first time i have seen a sweat session of a skypoker player and i enjoyed it, but if people post videos then obviously they expect comments on there play regardless of what stakes.
    Posted by benc
    I also asked if you'd like to play a mass amount of them, so therefore your a soft spot?
  • edited February 2013
    ^
    looool benc

    i must say i love the vid so great to have a little look into the think of a higher staked player.

    ty op for posting 
  • edited February 2013
    ive watched one previously, might be this one and there were a couple of 'WTF why did you fold that' moments
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    Is it just me or does he sound like Dave Gorman??? Gd video.
    Posted by Mohican
    I was thinking Jimmy Carr so maybe he missed a calling in stand up
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play? O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10? Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river?  taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger.  +1
    Posted by bolly580
    Lol who is ridiculing his play? are you a melodramatic tool? i was just pointing out that he was playing 9 bigs, and that his aq fold was good, and i agree the shove when styles potted the river was pretty good, . 
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : I also asked if you'd like to play a mass amount of them, so therefore your a soft spot?
    Posted by bolly580
    na ur a bum hunter fancy nl50 hu mate 4 tables???
  • edited February 2013
    Because someone has a certain amount on SKY is that considered their roll? So say you have £20000 on here and £100,000 on another site by playing £10/20 on here are you playing with 10 buy Ins?

     Edit:  I have no idea if this is the case or not.
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    Because someone has a certain amount on SKY is that considered their roll? So say you have £20000 on here and £100,000 on another site by playing £10/20 on here are you playing with 10 buy Ins?
    Posted by jonjo75
    na who is saying that!? i think somewhere he mentions, or that he gives the impression that his sky poker monies was his total bank roll, i may be wrong, but he was playing under rolled enough for little heart to skip a beat after a couple of bluffs he made, and so it should lol, its serious money.
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    Because someone has a certain amount on SKY is that considered their roll? So say you have £20000 on here and £100,000 on another site by playing £10/20 on here are you playing with 10 buy Ins?  Edit:  I have no idea if this is the case or not.
    Posted by jonjo75

    nah it different for high stake players they don't have there full roll on the site because of black friday.

    he prob be able to deposit back on the site if need be. i hope ....... =) 
  • edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think.....:
    In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : na who is saying that!? i think somewhere he mentions, or that he gives the impression that his sky poker monies was his total bank roll, i may be wrong, but he was playing under rolled enough for little heart to skip a beat after a couple of bluffs he made, and so it should lol, its serious money.
    Posted by WHOAMI196

    Oh ok I didn't here him say that bit.
Sign In or Register to comment.