Ok so first of all
hello again people
Why i have returned.......
Well i have now been playing poker for just over 2 years, and i am finally a winning MTT player, atm im specialized in low stakes, small MTTs with 60-100 people in it, and i remembered sky poker was my cryptonite, every descent hand i had i would get it all in and they would catch there draw, so, with my new knowledge on how to play against these people, i would like to see if i can do well in some of the smaller Sky Poker tournaments
I have ballances on 3 different sites, and even though i wont bring it across, i will however deposit a small ammount and use a combined BR to decide on my BRM, which over the past 2 months, i have been following GaryQQQs BRM rules, and with great succession
so even though i have only deposited £20, my actual ballance is £163
therefor im starting with £2 - £3 MTTs
A few leeks that i have repaired since the last time i was on SKY
1..... play much less hands
2..... Less bluffing just cus i know they dont have a big hand (They cant let it go)
3..... MTT selection (not just following a BRM, but also making sure they are slower paced allowing for less races for my stack on mediocre hands)
Comments
Good luck sir!
First of all - Welcome Back
Its always nice to see a player return to the site with the confidence that they have improved their game and with the acknoweledment that they have repared a few leaks.
Keep us up to date on your progress. Can't go too far wrong listening to GaryQQQ's advice on BRM, especially in small stakes MTTs so just keep that in mind when if you suffer a little variance and all should be well.
Best of Luck m8
Hi Sillymunch, a good idea might be to post some of your hands in the Poker Clinic to get other people's opinions. Especially as the people that frequent there (and are more than happy to share their advice and opinions) know Sky Poker well.
Thanks
Sky Poker
Wild stab in the dark says you limped in with 2 random cards because it was cheap.
Am I close?
Anyway, for the above hands, surely you want these calls when you are say 75-85% favourite?
GL at the tables sillymunch
Only in poker would players complain about supposedly BAD opponents!
Thanks for the mention. My BRM rules won't help anybody win, their main purpose is to make it very difficult to go bust.
[QUOTE]@Tikay thanks for the input lol, no in all honesty im not complaining about the hands xP i added the odds and everything to show how bad there plays were xP i started this as a genuine try at the tables and i just didnt get the cards today lmao, if im not racing a few times im never going to win an MTT, one of the tricks that i have learned about MTTs is only race when your about 80% favourate, so i will very rarely get it all in on the flop unless i have a top 10% hand unless of course they are giving me the correct odds to make the call, then i have to..... i also dont get my chips in if i just dont know where i am in the hand. 90% of the time if im calling an all in, its cus i know or hugely have a feeling that im ahead @Bolly. Dont worry the diary wont be a bad beats diary xP its just the way it worked on day 1, i had more bad beats then i did positive points, in fact the only positive hand was the one i have already mentioned @GaryQQQ...... my stats on sharkscope will show you the difference your 40BI rule has made in my game, i give you and anybody else permission to check out my rescent results I wont mention the names of the sites, but the usernames are sillymunchie, and Kingmuncher, my ROI was always 100-200% even when i was in minus' profit, but it was the BRM that cost me, when i won big i joined a bigger buy in, and eventually lost everything i won within a week nowadays its a nice steady fall with nice payouts when i do get to the final table
Posted by sillymunch
Hi Munchy.
Glad you took it as intended.
It was really addressed to poker people as a whole, & I'm a poker player. I've been playing poker a very long time, & I frequent 3 or 4 different Poker Forums, & have done for 10 or 12 years, so it is not a Sky Poker thing specifically, but.....
Even now, I struggle to understand why one of THE things I see & hear most frequently is poker players complaining about bad play by others. It just makes no sense to me. They should be bemoaning the fact that people make good plays. Note, incidentally, that we ONLY complain about "bad plays" or "bad players" when.....they beat us. 'Tis true!
When we beat players, we call them "lolbad", or "fish", when they beat us, they are bad players. Truly a go figure thing in my tiny mind.
I buy a lot of staking action in players, too. Their Staking Proposals invariably say "it will be a soft field, full of Frenchies & Satellite qualifiers". Fine, an opinion they are entitled to. Then one of these terribad Frenchies makes a bad play & beats us & so we have a mini-chunter about how bad they were. It is all way above my intelligence, or lack of.
You may have seen Ratsafish on the Sky Poker Cash Game. He gets roundly mocked by the purists for the way he plays, but he has cashed for around £250,000 in Tourneys in the last 18 months. Take away his losses, I bet he is still £150,000 to the good. How many of his critics can say that? Variance? Maybe. I'll take money in the bank over variance & purists all day long.
Andrew1947 was mocked by someone on here yesterday, rather rudely I thought. And yet he wins consistently, certainly more than those who deride him. Respect seems to be a forgotten value in poker.
PS - "only race when 80% favourite" - that is not a race. A race is the generic poker term for a flip, or coin-toss, A-K v Jacks or whatever. 80% fave is, say, Kings v Threes. Pleased to hear you only get it in good though, you sound like me - a proper nit. And nits, another much derided group, rarely go busto.
Hope you run good, & get the lot Munchy. Easier against bad players though.