Give this thread a bump when you next fold your Aces to pre-flop action and it turns out you'd have trebled up, because 70% of the time, that's what's going to happen.
Did anyone see the Turbo coverage tonight, was well weird. Aces held up, shorter stacks won all-ins, it was absolutely crazy!
Give this thread a bump when you next fold your Aces to pre-flop action and it turns out you'd have trebled up, because 70% of the time, that's what's going to happen. Did anyone see the Turbo coverage tonight, was well weird. Aces held up, shorter stacks won all-ins, it was absolutely crazy! Posted by bbMike
not be doing that mate not be playing no more not enjoying playing no more so when you get like that its time to quit not wasteing no more money just sitting there watching the same cards getting dealt and going out to larger stack everytime not poker to me that, and and no im not saying its rigged so good luck to everyone
Ok mate take care, if you're not enjoying it and you're not making money there aren't many more excuses to spend time on it. Good luck out there. Posted by bbMike
don't play to make money ,play for fun and try and breakeven or just under each month but not happened for 9 months now so throwing money away all the time may aswell play bingo or stick it on horse but on William hill instead as not donateing to sky no more
Let us leave AA out of this for a second and just list some simple truths here. Follow these and learn.
Playing a hand perfectly and losing = Good play Playing a hand badly and winning = Bad play Making a bad fold and you would have lost = Bad play Making a good fold and you would have won = Good play
Winning or losing the individual hand is totally irrelevant. Good play is good play and bad play is bad play. Good play time and time again will make a winning player. Bad play time and time again makes a losing player
Let us leave AA out of this for a second and just list some simple truths here. Follow these and learn. Playing a hand perfectly and losing = Good play Playing a hand badly and winning = Bad play Making a bad fold and you would have lost = Bad play Making a good fold and you would have won = Good play Winning or losing the individual hand is totally irrelevant. Good play is good play and bad play is bad play. Good play time and time again will make a winning player. Bad play time and time again makes a losing player Posted by Talon
Explain that 3rd line to me, I've read it a few times, can't work it out. A bad fold and would have lost is bad play? Thanks in advance.
In Response to Re: folding AA : Explain that 3rd line to me, I've read it a few times, can't work it out. A bad fold and would have lost is bad play? Thanks in advance. Posted by thefa1lacy
That would be like the op. Folding aces. It is a bad fold. The result doesnt matter you shouldnt have made the fold
In Response to Re: folding AA : Explain that 3rd line to me, I've read it a few times, can't work it out. A bad fold and would have lost is bad play? Thanks in advance. Posted by thefa1lacy
Yeah like OP.... folds AA, then says 'well I would have lost to a set' so therefore it's a good fold. The result doesn't stop it being a bad fold pre
In Response to Re: folding AA : don't play to make money ,play for fun and try and breakeven or just under each month but not happened for 9 months now so throwing money away all the time may aswell play bingo or stick it on horse but on William hill instead as not donateing to sky no more Posted by screwy27
LOL I give up! It was an [OR] clause! Ideally you can have fun [AND] win money, but it's still understandable to continue playing if you fulfil only one of those criteria. You describe having neither, so even if your reasons for not enjoying it maybe suspect or statistically flawed, it doesn't change the fact that you're not enjoying it and should therefore spend your time on something else. Life's too short and all that. Again, GL.
In Response to Re: folding AA : LOL I give up! It was an [OR] clause! Ideally you can have fun and win money, but it's still understandable to continue playing if you fulfil only one of those criteria. You describe having neither, so even if your reasons for not enjoying it maybe suspect or statistically flawed, it doesn't change the fact that you're not enjoying it and should therefore spend your time on something else. Life's too short and all that. Again, GL. Posted by bbMike
lost cause mike, no point bothering, he will realise one day but until then its pointless trying to educate someone that dosn't want to learn.
Let us leave AA out of this for a second and just list some simple truths here. Follow these and learn. Playing a hand perfectly and losing = Good play Playing a hand badly and winning = Bad play Making a bad fold and you would have lost = Bad play Making a good fold and you would have won = Good play Winning or losing the individual hand is totally irrelevant. Good play is good play and bad play is bad play. Good play time and time again will make a winning player. Bad play time and time again makes a losing player Posted by Talon
Depends on how much money someone wants to give me to fold AA pre - other than the money considerations it's never a fold unless you have 2/3 all ins before you - then it gets tricky.
Depends on how much money someone wants to give me to fold AA pre - other than the money considerations it's never a fold unless you have 2/3 all ins before you - then it gets tricky. Posted by rancid
had 2 all ins before me,thats why I folded 1 maybe would of called
Comments
Did anyone see the Turbo coverage tonight, was well weird. Aces held up, shorter stacks won all-ins, it was absolutely crazy!
Good luck out there.
Playing a hand perfectly and losing = Good play
Playing a hand badly and winning = Bad play
Making a bad fold and you would have lost = Bad play
Making a good fold and you would have won = Good play
Winning or losing the individual hand is totally irrelevant. Good play is good play and bad play is bad play. Good play time and time again will make a winning player. Bad play time and time again makes a losing player