You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
My worst beat ever I would say!
Although hilarious and I didn't realise with auto top up I had lost the hand until my next action on this table popped up!
Nice hand sir!
| Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donttelmum | Small blind | £0.20 | £0.20 | £19.60 | |
| billytheki | Big blind | £0.20 | £0.40 | £33.75 | |
| Your hole cards |
| ||||
| Batkin88 | Raise | £0.60 | £1.00 | £30.89 | |
| weedgi | Call | £0.60 | £1.60 | £45.07 | |
| Donttelmum | Fold | ||||
| billytheki | Fold | ||||
| Flop | |||||
| |||||
| Batkin88 | Bet | £0.80 | £2.40 | £30.09 | |
| weedgi | Call | £0.80 | £3.20 | £44.27 | |
| Turn | |||||
| |||||
| Batkin88 | Check | ||||
| weedgi | Check | ||||
| River | |||||
| |||||
| Batkin88 | Bet | £2.40 | £5.60 | £27.69 | |
| weedgi | Raise | £8.40 | £14.00 | £35.87 | |
| Batkin88 | All-in | £27.69 | £41.69 | £0.00 | |
| weedgi | All-in | £35.87 | £77.56 | £0.00 | |
| weedgi | Unmatched bet | £14.18 | £63.38 | £14.18 | |
| Batkin88 | Show |
| |||
| weedgi | Show |
| |||
| weedgi | Win | Four 9s | £61.58 | £75.76 | |
Comments
Unlucky, Batkin. That's the heart of poker. Beautiful but can be cruel!
It was a confused face, I am confused by the turn check.
I presume your comment was meant as a precursor to anybody who intended to give advice, as I clearly didnt give any........
And for the record you are imo, yet again, wrong.
Just because it is pretty clear when we have all the information that stacks are going in at somepoint, it is rather narrow minded to say that advice is unecessary.
During the hand does the villain know what hand the hero holds? Does the hero know what hand the villain holds. If you open your mind for one second, you would realise that advice can be very useful for times that the ranges are anything other than the villains hand 99 as above.
You are going broke 100% but say the villain had any other hand you might get value from, why cant heros bet sizing etc be discussed?
You clearly are NOT putting villain on 99 or you would have folded. If this was me, I would find the discussion of extracting value from xx to be very useful. Getting value when we have the nuts/near nuts is my bread and butter. I would say its rather obtuse to believe that just because of the mega cooler, there is nothing to learn if we substitute in a wider range.
nb, I say hero only because it is the common denominator in poker. Dont accuse me of sexism
If I wanted advice I would post in the clinic, as I didn't I clearly am not asking for advice.
Also shorten your replies I read about 4 lines and got bored
The location of this post is bye the bye. You made a statement that said:
"Only a complete tool would try and give advice on this hand".
You did not address any of the issues that I raised about the potential for discussion on the above hand. You are merely trying to reverse out of the back door by using the locality of this post as a get out clause.
I did originally place you as of one of the sharper members of this forum. Having had recent direct communications with you, you now strike me as the ilk that rather than being able to form reasoned counter points, just reverts to doging the issue.
A long and prosperous career in politics awaits.
Should you care to put forward your reasoning to why this hand could not be discussed in more detail, [sic] my previous comment, then I am all ears.......
vul. they say @ 30nl if you get raised on the river it's always the nuts
To some extent I am embarrassed for you.
Though on the plus side your attention span might be able to see out the entirety of this post, which is a nice Brucie bonus
Talk about a broken record..... At the time I said it was a mistake, which was validated by another player. I have said this on several occasions.
As you are either incapable or unwilling to let this go I suggest you put me on ignore as I have no intention of withholding comments I have to make on your say so.
FWIW I would actually read this thread fully, you are implying that I have not offered any "constructive" points to this thread. Perhaps take the time to read back what you have contributed. Pot kettle black?
If this is the worst you've ever had... welcome to the world of grinding cash poker, you've got some fun in store! I once got it in on the flop with JJ v J8 on J8x only to see it run out 8, 8 for perfect, perfect and his only way out lol
I am not re-reading the thread as I don't want advice on how to play the hand.
And imo
Construct and discuss your point of view /> Ignore > provide lame comebacks
I would like to confirm however I reported what you said as it was disgusting and vile and I hope one day you realise what a pathetic person you are. Hopefully we will meet one day and we can see if you are as confident in person which I am pretty sure will be the complete opposite as is with most forum trolls.
Again I will not reply to your next post not only because it will probably bore me to death but also as you clearly want the last word like the child you have shown yourself as.
Enter your reply below (Make it as sarcastic and as funny as possible to smother your own ego as you will likely be the only one reading it)
Kalie (Female age 25)
xx
You are quite right, I should have been given 30years in Parkhurst for my crimes against humanity.
"I will do you a favour as you clearly want the last word and leave the final post to yourself."
Very kind of you
"I would like to confirm however I reported what you said as it was disgusting and vile"
You go girl
"I hope one day you realise what a pathetic person you are."
A generalisation based on what exactly.
"Hopefully we will meet one day and we can see if you are as confident in person which I am pretty sure will be the complete opposite as is with most forum trolls."
Sorry, your inability to form reasoned debates mean I think you would not stimulate me intellectually, if we meet by accident then so be it.
"Again I will not reply to your next post not only because it will probably bore me to death but also as you clearly want the last word like the child you have shown yourself as."
Blimey, I would hate to have dared say something intentionally offensive, I presume you would had have me deported by now.
"Enter your reply below (Make it as sarcastic and as funny as possible to smother your own ego as you will likely be the only one reading"
Challenge accepted
"Kalie (Female age 25) xx"
Are you not too old to have prams to throw toys from?
As a final point, its beyond ironic that after my alleged (accidental) misdemeanor, you have thrown way more potentially offensive remarks back at me. Do two wrongs make a right?
Best
ccf
#Assumptions