You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

The Case Against Teams

2»

Comments

  • edited January 2015
    # Hitman RV,
    Dave, is it because TKP have only ever featured once in the top two,
    in the inaugural two team compy, in the 4 years it's been running, lol ;)



    .....lights blue touch-paper and retreats to safe distance
  • edited January 2015
    Teams = Good

    Idiots = Bad

    The latter (and I 100% include myself in that category sometimes) would still exist without the teams.  Yes the teams create an environment and community in which it is easier for the idiots to be heard, but take away the teams and we'd still find somewhere else to express our idiocy.

    Regarding restricting who can set up teams or how they can be set up, now that really does sound like a dictatorship.  The current way is just fine, you don't have to be in a team, if you want to you can choose to be in any team you like (providing they are taking on new members), if non of the existing teams fit hey feel free to set one up yourself.
  • edited January 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    # Hitman RV, Dave, is it because TKP have only ever featured once in the top two, in the inaugural two team compy, in the 4 years it's been running, lol ;) .....lights blue touch-paper and retreats to safe distance
    Posted by Red_King

    LOL!! You Bad!!

    TKP, The First EVER Forum DTD Champions, Have to be respected!!
    Defo XX


    I Remember  Now they formed from a Join up of Dave PillingsTeam Ploppers & Irenes Team 'Poker Knights' or summat I think, Eyeman will correct me..

    The First Poker Teams Admittedly!!


    How Did Titans start Trev, Dale??


  • edited January 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    # Hitman RV, Dave, is it because TKP have only ever featured once in the top two, in the inaugural two team compy, in the 4 years it's been running, lol ;) .....lights blue touch-paper and retreats to safe distance
    Posted by Red_King
    also I think TPT did actually join in later that Month, I will check back!!

    Nope I was wrong...
    First Month was only a ONE week Month, checkout this History...
    PMSL!! I Made top Ten with 109 points, but it was agg of 3 results then, & for nealry first year!!

    Kennybad joined THS later Gutted, we woulda won first title!!

    Think Trev jumped in on that first nite with few TPT & Team DTD League was born!

    COMP /

    PLAYER

    7.15

    DP STK

    7.45

    DP STK

    8.30 TOTY

    TOTAL

    ROSSJB14 (TKP)

    4

    8

    10

    22

    YOUNG GUN (THS)

    1

    43

    11

    55

    KENNYBAD

    22

    17

    17

    56

    MADMOO (TPT)

    16

    15

    37

    68

    GREGHOGG (TKP)

    17

    44

    15

    76

    MP33

    48

    20

    18

    86

    DTWBANDIT (TKP)

    64

    12

    24

    100

    BARBIE59 (THS)

    35

    7

    59

    101

    FREECHIPS1

    78

    3

    23

    104

    HITMAN RV (THS)

    42

    9

    58

    109

  • edited January 2015
    Brief History of TKP, the first team on Sky

    Interestingly TKP were actually indirectly formed by Sky!

    As Dave says Team Plop and Knights of the Oval table formed a rivalry in the Sky promotion of the team games

    TKP then formed as these two merged after the event, the rivalry was always great banter 

    Sky originally formed these teams, I was in team Dohhhhhh, the eventual winners, teams of 8

    If you were either of these two teams you became automatically member of TKP, others joined by association

    I am not in any team but was in TKP, I see no harm, there are other teams outside of Sky poker and some of those have sponsorships by major online sites, other groups such as My Poker Pal, Grassroots Poker and The Pokeriety are all great group resources on social media.
  • edited January 2015

    Teams (or preferably groups/squads) are a great idea for poker. They're made up 99% of fun/recreational players and anything that encourages these types of people to play more poker has to be good for the game.

    The only problem I see is that of collusion. NOT by team members themselves but it's easy for new/inexperienced players reading the forum and seeing a 'team' section to get the wrong idea about what is and isn't acceptable at the table. 

    "Well they're a team so why shouldn't me and my mate play as a team" sort of thing. I'm sure it happens. 

    Sky did the right thing in banning team names from players locations at the table, I'd go a step further and remove this section of the forum too. 

    I think the team captains are all very well suited to their roles and do a great job in ensuring that the positives of having teams far outweigh the negatives. 



  • edited January 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    Brief History of TKP, the first team on Sky Interestingly TKP were actually indirectly formed by Sky! As Dave says Team Plop and Knights of the Oval table formed a rivalry in the Sky promotion of the team games TKP then formed as these two merged after the event, the rivalry was always great banter  Sky originally formed these teams, I was in team Dohhhhhh, the eventual winners, teams of 8 If you were either of these two teams you became automatically member of TKP, others joined by association I am not in any team but was in TKP, I see no harm, there are other teams outside of Sky poker and some of those have sponsorships by major online sites, other groups such as My Poker Pal, Grassroots Poker and The Pokeriety are all great group resources on social media.
    Posted by SolarCarro
    I have never been in a team but if I was to be in a team I now know what team I would be in!

    Given anyone can start a team and anyone can leave a team this by default means that captains cant just do what they want long term as if they do then upset members can leave and start a new team or just not be in a team at all. You don't have to be in the same team as someone to be friends with them/talk strategy etc likewise you don't have to get on with everyone in your team. Some people aren't going to get on with others, that's life, get on with it and move on.
  • edited January 2015
    Hi Graham
    Here are my thoughts on the teams debate.

    The problem arises here when Sky has allowed anyone to set up teams, styling themselves as "captains" etc without anyone checking to see how those teams are run, who can or can't join a team and who makes the decision as to who is "in" or "out" for whatever reason.
    The criteria for TPT "Team Poker Titans" is ANYONE can join and anyone can leave, they are free to come and go as they please. We exist to have fun & support one another at the tables. I see us as more of a "Social Group" than a team. The only players that have ever been removed from the team list are those that have been seriously abusive in the chat box or on the forum, but thankfully there haven't been too many.

    Now, if there wasn't any reward for teams, it wouldn't be relevant or any of Sky's concern about team politics and the in-fighting that can go on when any group of people get together with any sort of hierarchy system. However, Sky DOES offer team prizes, and so indirectly they encourage and condone the pettiness that can and does occur.
    The DTD Prizes are awarded on individual performance & NOT on team performance. You don't need to be in a team to play the DTD or win prizes.
    The team league however, which is run separately and was originally started by Hitman does now have team prizes and on this point I can agree with you.
    At present a Free tournament seat etc is awarded to a team based on team performance and it is then up to Captains/Vice captains to allocate that seat to one of it's players. Unfortunately at the moment there is no fair way or system in place to award that seat to team members.
    In the past myself or our vice captain have tried to distribute prizes based on a players performance, players who are actively involved in supporting other team members or just generally a player who may be going through a downswing etc, but this is far from ideal. 
    I think the DTD competition is a great idea. It has brought about a great community spirit, and the teams really get behind their players. Think on this, would it have been any different if Sky had nominated teams, and DTD players were assigned a team randomly in order? Not only would it take away this hierarchy, but it would also mean that all teams would have roughly equal numbers (clearly some people would register with a team, then never or rarely play so slight inequities could exist over time, but that can be remedied when new players join). They could still have facebook pages, and team spirit, but no-one could be removed on the whim of a single person (whether warranted or not). Surely Sky should be deciding who can or can't win prizes, not team captains?
    The problem with Sky nominating teams & players is, you will never have the same comradary. At present we are a group of friends/mates who enjoy our poker & enjoy the sociability aspect of being in a group. I have never seen the same level of support with the sky teams REDS, YELLOWS, BLUE etc and a lot of the time players are away. These types of teams will never flourish or have the same level of support, fun & banter as a group of friends.

    Teams having equal numbers? - TPT have a team list of over 100 players, however we very rarely field 15-20 players each week. When we had a limit of 20 team members we struggled to field a competitive team each week as some of those members were not active each week.

    You have mentioned the hierarchy within teams a few times, but in my opinion it works just like facebook - You set up a page or a group & then friends / colleagues request to join & you either accept them as friends or you don't. As the person that set up that page/group you are the self appointed "Admin" - People who don't like you won't request to join & people who are disruptive or abusive will be removed, so in my opinion it's really as simple as that really.

    I don't see myself as the captain, but I am responsible to ensure our group / team thread complies with the rules of the forum & have always strived to ensure players respect others at the tables.     

    I'm not saying I'm right, but am opening up a discussion. There's been some unsavoury incidents from time to time, and maybe that's just human nature, but give someone a little power, and they can behave in very strange ways.

    Teams or no teams, there will always be some unsavoury incidents, on the forum & in the chat boxes, but surely the the teams / social groups can only have a positive impact on reducing this sort of behaviour? 
    If friends / players want to be in our team, we always ask that they show others respect & act in a responsible manner and I think this can only have a positive impact for all involved and makes it a more enjoyable online experience.

    TPT have always supported one another as a group and I can only hope we continue to do so, I see us as nothing more than online friends & some of us have even become close friends outside of online poker too, so it has had many positive impacts & very few minor ones.

    All teams do things differently I suppose, but on the whole I think it has been a good thing.

    Can we allocate prizes differently or better? YES perhaps it is something we can look at so that the allocation of prizes / seats is NOT in the control of captains / vice captains etc. I think that would be a good thing.
  • edited January 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    In Response to The Case Against Teams : Sky poker randomly drop a river card, look what happens then if it doesn't fall inline with what players wanted, in some cases this sends people away from sky and all kinds of negative feedback....just sayin ;) But honestly, I used to be a gamer and joined teams for that, it's the best thing to do in my opinion and nice to have a choice who you are online socialising, gaming and sharing ideas with. Wouldn't dropping people in random teams be hierachy and control yet again, we are all adults on sky poker I think it's fair we make choices and enjoy it how we choose, I stick to being allowed to make choices :) I am pretty much an outsider here, but I wouldn't mind reading the sub-text on this one, 



  • edited January 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    In Response to The Case Against Teams : Sky poker randomly drop a river card, look what happens then if it doesn't fall inline with what players wanted, in some cases this sends people away from sky and all kinds of negative feedback....just sayin ;) But honestly, I used to be a gamer and joined teams for that, it's the best thing to do in my opinion and nice to have a choice who you are online socialising, gaming and sharing ideas with. Wouldn't dropping people in random teams be hierachy and control yet again, we are all adults on sky poker I think it's fair we make choices and enjoy it how we choose, I stick to being allowed to make choices :) I am pretty much an outsider here, but I wouldn't mind reading the sub-text on this one, interesting post. I think your outcome would be the hunger games of skypoker
    Posted by justmartin
    FFS ,cant anyone see the obvios,if thers anything you dont like about it go away

  • edited January 2015
    I have already posted in the case FOR teams and generally that is where I side.

    The only negative aspect is when there are team related disputes aired on the forum. 

    This can all get a bit unseemly and doesnt promote the team aspect of the forum very well at all.

    People disagree, fine, agree to differ and move on, or sort your issues out in private please.

    Not saying I am above all of this - I myself crossed a line and issued an apology recently.

    It really doesnt help when the same circular arguements are repeated in multiple threads.

    #Sortitoutteams

    1 team should count above all and that is team sky poker (no capitals - I dont mean the blue hoodie weraers) the one we are all a part of. 



  • edited January 2015
    Eyeman..... Again (Smiley face)
  • edited January 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    I have already posted in the case FOR teams and generally that is where I side. The only negative aspect is when there are team related disputes aired on the forum.  This can all get a bit unseemly and doesnt promote the team aspect of the forum very well at all. People disagree, fine, agree to differ and move on, or sort your issues out in private please. Not saying I am above all of this - I myself crossed a line and issued an apology recently. It really doesnt help when the same circular arguements are repeated in multiple threads. #Sortitoutteams 1 team should count above all and that is team sky poker (no capitals - I dont mean the blue hoodie weraers) the one we are all a part of. 
    Posted by Phantom66
    +1.

    Most Minor Internal Disputes are kept off Forums!

    Of The Very Very Few who in past have Brought Dispute to Teams & Tarred with a negative brush, most are No longer Sky Players.

    You will get Negative Trolls in all Walks of Life, Nowadays, The Forums & FB give them a Massive Platform for their Agenda's

    The Current Team Captains, DTD & FOSP Admins, seem to work well together Now,to Sort any Issues Quickly & keep the Harmony,   ;]
  • edited April 2015
    I fear that recent events have greatly strengthened the case against teams.

    How as a community do we move forward?

    Should we keep teams?

    Should we keep team events?

    If so do we need to make any changes to how team events are run to ensure complete fairness and integrity?
  • edited April 2015
  • edited April 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    I fear that recent events have greatly strengthened the case against teams. How as a community do we move forward? Should we keep teams? Should we keep team events? If so do we need to make any changes to how team events are run to ensure complete fairness and integrity?
    Posted by Phantom66
    Although the team aspect was a main part in this latest incident nearly all team players play the DTD in a fair and honest manner. No one can guarantee that there wont be cheating in any tournament but I'd like to believe that most players have a greater integrity
  • edited April 2015
    BAN ALL TEAMS THANK YOU,when i looked for team THS it seems to have gone,so why bother if other teams can play
  • edited April 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    BAN ALL TEAMS THANK YOU,when i looked for team THS it seems to have gone,so why bother if other teams can play
    Posted by paige55
    It's only a new thread that needs starting.
  • edited April 2015
    In Response to Re: The Case Against Teams:
    BAN ALL TEAMS THANK YOU,when i looked for team THS it seems to have gone,so why bother if other teams can play
    Posted by paige55[/

    you might find it in area 51....
Sign In or Register to comment.