You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Vaigrets Alternative Jackpot perms
If you have given me support on syndicate threads thanks, if not no problem,just wont be posting on those at all.
Good luck to you all
Good luck to you all
Comments
1.50: CHEMICAL CHARGE LOST
2.20: PERFECT ANGEL LOST
3.30: GALILEO GOLD LOST
REMOVERS LIST
1.50:
HAWKBILL , MINUS 5
MIDTERM, PLUS 5
MY DREAM BOAT PLUS 5
2.20:
BARRINGTON, PLUS 3
KOROPICK, PLUS 4
SIMMIE PLUS 4
2.55:
AL HAMDANY, PLUS 2
MISTER BLUE SKY NR
BUSH HOUSE PLUS 2
3.30
ACCLAIM PLUS 3
4.05
KIT MARLOWE PLUS 5
KODITIME PLUS 5
ROGUE PLUS 2
STARLIGHT MYSTERY PLUS 2
42 points scored
Points Scoring System:
Successfully remove a 5/1 shot or less (5 points)
Successfully remove a 11/2 to 15/2 shot (4 points)
Successfully remove a 8/1 to 11/1 shot (3 points)
Successfully remove an 12/1 shot or bigger (2 points)
If your removal wins at a latest price of 12/1 or bigger (minus 10 points)
If your removal wins at etc etc 8/1 to 11/1 (minus 8 points)
If your removal wins at etc etc 11/2 to 15/2 (minus 6 points)
If your removal wins at etc etc 5/1 or less (minus 5 points)
1.50
1,3,4
2.20
1, 5, 8
2.55
2, 3, 4,5,6,8,9,11
3.30
4,7,9
4.05
2
4.40
1,2,3,4,6
1080 x 0.50=£540
Why I replied to post before third race, was expecting a comment like that
Strange thing was the reason I put this perm on here was as I said to wynne it was what the removers came up with and it just coincided with my suggestion to Graham that perhaps we didn't always need multiple perms and multiple bankers if the crew thoughts came up with that. I thought that funny as before Chester last week that was the way he was going but he saw the light and went for multiple perms that day because others and myself thought Dihat dodgy. Having seen the light and winning he then wasn't going toleave the road to Damascus and got upset and said it would be too expensive. He also banned me because I had the audacity to come up with an idea.
So when the removers came up with a perm and you can check my workings out for yourself that covered the horses that we wanted to stay for 1080 at 0.50= £540 I thought I would post it on here to see if it worked. Surprise surprise it did with no hedging needed.
Anyway I got chucked out and to be honest it wouldn't be fair on Graham who is doing sterling work on this for me to be involved going forward and I wish you and all the other syndicate members all the best. And lots more winnings!!!!
If you look at the timings of my posts and where I made them you will see I didn't even know I was under threat until he said right your banned.
No problem anyway I will follow you all and bet on your horses in the last race when you get their again and make just as much as I would have from my share/
Just in case you don't want to post on the other thread again, I have copied my reply to your post here:
----------------------------------------
OK, no problem, my misunderstanding. TY for clarifying.
When the funds have been received from the betting account, I will transfer £20 to your account, as per the dividend. I will then make a further payment to you on 31st May for whatever the share value is (minus £5) at that time.
Is that acceptable?
Or I can just send you £25.55 (£20 div + £5.55 share value) now and we are square, no further dealings to be had.
It depends if you want to be IN for any bets for the remainder of this month. Which might be a mute point if there aren't any.
What would you prefer? Please let me know.
Cheers,
G
P.S. Quite glad both RIBCHESTER AND DENAAR won, so it leaves neither of us saying/thinking, "I told you so", as that would not be showing any class. So no-one lost face here. GL for the future. I wish you all the best and I genuinely mean that.
Similarly to be fair to you I won't post on your threads again.
However, I just wanted to say, when we GO-LIVE and do a multi-perm approach, I would be very happy for you to do a single perm alternative, as you did with Newbury.
It will be interesting to see which approach works best, over time, and you may also enjoy doing it. So I am happy for you to use the NAP's and Remover's selections to create a single perm alternative.
Like I said, I won't post here again, but if you feel like putting up an "opposing" single perm when we do our multi-perms, I won't take it the wrong way and would actually welcome it, so I can compare what would have been most effective over time.
Up to you of course, but I would be very happy for you to do that, and it would assist the syndicate.
I am sure neither of us will say "I told you so" when one way is successful and the other not. But as a comparison it could be very useful.
Cheers,
G
Could be fun
Mine would be
2.05 Listen to me 2nd and Turn Turk 1st
2.35 Beat That 2nd and Brother Tedd 1st
3.05 1,2,3,4,8, 9, 12 Winner 8 Vancouver
3.40 1,3,4,6 WINNER 6 DESTINYS GOLD
4.15 1,2,3,4 WINNER 2 DAYS OF HEAVEN
4.45 3,4,5, 6 LOSER BROWNVILLE WON
= 1792 x .50 p = £896
Good luck us this afternoon
Very difficult from what removers said to decide between Belmont Jewel and Listen to me. Just hope I haven't left wrong one out.
P.S. I owe you £1.10 which will be paid to your bank account on 31/05/17.
Cheers,
G
Going forward, I will record each of our profit and loss (The syndicate and yours), to get a longer term picture as time goes by.
I hope you do get LEG 6.
Cheers,
G