You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Why Oh Why Oh Why??

edited May 2010 in Poker Chat
In Response to Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
Is it just me, or are WE all (swear) idiots playing on this  site, how long are  Sky Poker going to  keep  taking  the (swear) out of us .... It's not as if they  don't have the ability or know how in the technical  department, so  'Why oh Why' is EVERY tournament on here 6 seaters, whats wrong  with  giving the players  a variety and putting some proper 10 seater tournaments  on ... I'll  tell you  why, they want fast  games  fast  turnover, where the range of  hands  being played  are  much wider, enabling it to  be 'crap-shoot' poker, you only  have to  listen to  the analysts to  realise, with  their talk of,   'get it in' and 'shove'  ?? They   (The Company) are obviously not interested in putting on tournaments with  a structure that enables a decent  game, it's all geared for 'FAST TURNOVER' and has  been from the very start .. and  don't be thinking 'deep stack' 6 seaters is good structure (jeez) ??. Don't get me wrong I actually like fast games  sometimes, when  I don't have time for a long  session on the computer but if I want to play a proper 10 seater tournament for the  evening,  then I'm forced to play on other sites, who  give you the chance  to  play the same kind of  games that  are played in Casino structured tournaments  , 10  seaters !... Two things  are happening here, either as I said,  the 'directors' of the company want to  keep things the way they are, enabling fast turnover, or they are being badly advised as to  what the customer really wants !!  You only have  to  see or know, the amount of  good players who over the last 18 months   have either left or don't play here much  to  realise, Sky Poker have  got things wrong. Oh they'll tell you, traffic is up, but there not the figures include 'bingo games' and 'Vegas games' ... You only have to look how the guaranteed tournaments  have been  reduced and  overlays keep  happening on their 8 00  TV games... Ultimately in my mind it's either, greedy directors who  want fast games or bad  advice on what the customer want   in the way of online poker..!!  And in my opinion the jury is  out on that one, I dont know !! Ok  'mods'  quick  before the 'directors' reads this,  send this thread to  'area 51 or the 'bin'
Posted by bennydip2
Benny,

The "directors" probably don't monitor to the granularity you believe, and are as much interested in maintaining a happy customer base, than trying to manufacture tiny margins.  6 seater format over 10 seater format, bigger rake vs happier customers.  Sky, as a 100s of million ££ organisation, are probably infinitely more concerned with keeping you as a customer than anything else...

Am sure Sky(poker) would welcome suggestions and would introduce 10 seaters and different structures  to keep their customers happy and people would play?

Why not try via - community suggestions - and then moan if they don't implement? (Apologies if you have already tried this)

Regards, Dan
«1

Comments

  • edited May 2010
    Is it just me, or are WE all (swear) idiots playing on this  site, how long are  Sky Poker going to  keep  taking  the (swear) out of us ....

    It's not as if they  don't have the ability or know how in the technical  department,
    so  'Why oh Why' is EVERY tournament on here 6 seaters, whats wrong  with  giving the players  a variety and putting some proper 10 seater tournaments  on ...

    I'll  tell you  why, they want fast  games  fast  turnover, where the range of  hands  being played  are  much wider, enabling it to  be 'crap-shoot' poker, you only  have to  listen to  the analysts to  realise, with  their talk of,   'get it in' and 'shove'  ??

    They   (The Company) are obviously not interested in putting on tournaments with  a structure that enables a decent  game, it's all geared for 'FAST TURNOVER' and has  been from the very start ..
    and  don't be thinking 'deep stack' 6 seaters is good structure (jeez) ??.

    Don't get me wrong I actually like fast games  sometimes, when  I don't have time for a long  session on the computer but if I want to play a proper 10 seater tournament for the  evening,  then I'm forced to play on other sites, who  give you the chance  to  play the same kind of  games that  are played in Casino structured tournaments  , 10  seaters !...

    Two things  are happening here, either as I said,  the 'directors' of the company want to  keep things the way they are, enabling fast turnover, or they are being badly advised as to  what the customer really wants !! 

    You only have  to  see or know, the amount of  good players who over the last 18 months   have either left or don't play here much,  to  realise  Sky Poker have  got things wrong.
    Oh they'll tell you, traffic is up, but it's not !!  The figures include 'bingo games' and 'Vegas games' ... You only have to look how the guaranteed tournaments  have been  reduced and  overlays keep  happening on their 8 00  TV games...

    Ultimately in my mind it's either, greedy directors who  want fast games or bad  advice on what the customer wants   in the way of online poker..!! 
    And in my opinion the jury is  out on that one, I dont know !!

    Ok  'mods'  quick  before the 'directors' reads this,  send this thread to  'area 51 or the 'bin'
     click to enlarge ..
  • edited May 2010
    There are 10-seater slow structure tournaments on this site.
    The fields are generally quite small despite the tournaments being promoted regularly.

    When the majority of MTTs were changed to 10-seater, there was an enormous wave of complaint on this forum.

    The tournaments that you mention may have smaller numbers of players but the overall number of hands played on this site is increasing. The obvious conclusion from this would be that the majority of players prefer to play other types of games.

    So, basically, your argument seems to hold no water whatsoever.
  • edited May 2010
    If u never have anything positive to say about Sky Poker or u don't like anything about it.........why don't u just go and play on a site that has 10 seater games and other things that u don't like here?????

    All these moaning threads are boring and ultimately repetitive!  It's like u look for an issue that's not there and decide it's gonna be ur weekly moan that we all have to read.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:

    It is a shame there are not more 10 seater games or even higher volumes of other sit n go games.  Other sites do have 10, 20 and 30 player 10 seater sng's that seem to rattle off and a fast rate, so there is always a game to play.  Most people on SKY seem to be playing tournament games. When you see that there are only 2000 people online and 700 are in just one tournament, you can se how the site and players are geared. I love the site and the tv programme, but I know where you are comming from, it is very frustrating playing here.

    I don't know why the volume of players is so much smaller than other sites. But on the other hand if there were 10000 players on line at any one time would it still feel like the sky poker we all know ??

    Tough one !!  I can't seem to win here, where as I can on other sites, but I like the chat, setup and Richard Orford  (lol)

    Hang in there
  • edited May 2010
    I love 10 seater tournies and think we should have more of them. There are some 10 seater tournies on sky every night, The Orfordable (Wed, Frid, Sat & Sun 7pm) Tikay Sleepstack (Wed 7pm) 10 handed deepy etc, however, the fields are quite low and no gtd prize pool, but still great value.

    Perhaps sky could look into having an 8pm main event/tourny with this type of structure and guaranteed prize pool. I for one would definately give it my vote.

    After 7pm I don't see any 10 seater tournies, so again, perhaps sky could look at dropping a couple more in and see how they go.

    Not entirly sure I agree with how you have made your point Benny but I do agree with the 10 seater toury structure............They are Great.  
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    If u never have anything positive to say about Sky Poker or u don't like anything about it.........why don't u just go and play on a site that has 10 seater games and other things that u don't like here????? All these moaning threads are boring and ultimately repetitive!  It's like u look for an issue that's not there and decide it's gonna be ur weekly moan that we all have to read.
    Posted by phil12uk
    Obviously you didn't read the post  properly as in it I said there  are times when I enjoy quick tournaments because of the time that I might have available ,,
    As Trev points out, you try finding a 10 seater tournament  here after 7 00 or 8 00  ,, 

    On another  point, had  I not had  a 'MOAN' as you call it, about the backlog of  points in the system of long standing players here, they wouldn't have had  a chance  of playing in the April Vegas 1100 game.
    I've had  messages here and in the PM thanking me for pushing that thread.  

     Also,  if and when I need  you  to  tell me where to  play, I'll ask, someone  who knows what their talking about ..
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : Obviously you didn't read the post  properly as in it I said there  are times when I enjoy quick tournaments because of the time that I might have available ,, As Trev points out, you try finding a 10 seater tournament  here after 7 00 or 8 00  ,,  On another  point, had  I not had  a 'MOAN' as you call it, about the backlog of  points in the system of long standing players here, they wouldn't have had  a chance  of playing in the April Vegas 1100 game. I've had  messages here and in the PM thanking me for pushing that thread.    Also,  if and when I need  you  to  tell me where to  play, I'll ask, someone  who knows what their talking about ..
    Posted by bennydip2
    You give yourself FAR too much credit here. I suspect that the changes occurred despite your rants rather than because of them.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : Obviously you didn't read the post  properly as in it I said there  are times when I enjoy quick tournaments because of the time that I might have available ,, As Trev points out, you try finding a 10 seater tournament  here after 7 00 or 8 00  ,,  On another  point, had  I not had  a 'MOAN' as you call it, about the backlog of  points in the system of long standing players here, they wouldn't have had  a chance  of playing in the April Vegas 1100 game. I've had  messages here and in the PM thanking me for pushing that thread.    Also,  if and when I need  you  to  tell me where to  play, I'll ask, someone  who knows what their talking about ..
    Posted by bennydip2
    I agree that 10 seater tournies are lacking - the sleepstack on Wednesdays gets decent runners and is enjoyed by all.  I also agree that something had to be done about the points backlog and a lot of people appreciated the chance to use some to try and get to vegas.

    However, my point - which I am certain is matched by many on this forum - is the way u do moan constantly (and if picky, in the wrong sections). Once an issue has been slightly resolved, u move onto another one.  Look at the number of responses to another 'moaning thread' by AJS about cash tables.......His is constructive and meaningful to many players who choose to play on this site.

    Ur post regarding ur birthday cake was ur first positive opening thread for a long time.  Happy birthday by the way.
  • edited May 2010
    well i play on sky because i prefere 6 seated tables and im guessing thats why most people play here??
  • edited May 2010
    So's  not  to appear negative for  Vince and  Phil, my Idea would be,  

    Three  10  seater Guaranteed tournaments in place of Bounty Hunters around the times of 8 30, 9 30  and  10 30 ...  blind levels could  be 10mins

     £10 +1 with 5  places paid ..example  if  only 30 runners turned up, Sky's profit would  still be £10

    130
     75
     56
     35
     24
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    £5 +.50p ..  5 places paid (same as above)

    65
    37
    28
    18
    12
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    £2.50 +.25p .. 5 places (same as above)

    33
    18
    14
      9
     6
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The above is based on 30 players guaranteed 5 places paid ...  now  after 7.30pm  and with  Guarantee of £200 , £100, and £50 I'm sure the turnout would be more  .........

    However I'm sure Vince and  Phil know better   :))
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : You give yourself FAR too much credit here. I suspect that the changes occurred despite your rants rather than because of them.
    Posted by MereNovice

    You Think So  ???
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    So's  not  to appear negative for  Vince and  Phil, my Idea would be,   Three  10  seater Guaranteed tournaments in place of Bounty Hunters around the times of 8 30, 9 30  and  10 30 ...  blind levels could  be 10mins  £10 +1 with 5  places paid ..example  if  only 30 runners turned up, Sky's profit would  still be £10 130  75  56  35  24 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ £5 +.50p ..  5 places paid (same as above) 65 37 28 18 12 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ £2.50 +.25p .. 5 places (same as above) 33 18 14   9  6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The above is based on 30 players guaranteed 5 places paid ...  now  after 7.30pm  and with  Guarantee of £200 , £100, and £50 I'm sure the turnout would be more  ......... However I'm sure Vince and  Phil know better   :))
    Posted by bennydip2
    Benny, ur now not reading my posts and I'm not getting into a playground spat with you.  I AGREED that the 10 seater tournies are enjoyed ( see sleepstack example).  This suggestion sounds good and is a constructive way to generate ideas and conversation rather than being a negative thread.

    On this note, I'm sure they fiddled with the format for the deepies a few months ago between 6 and 10 seaters and the overall response from the players was that the 6 seaters were much more popular - hence why Sky tend to stick with them in general.
  • edited May 2010
    TBH i dont have any preferences between 6 and 10 seaters, however i do think that 10 seaters are not good if under 30 players are in the tourney, which happens a lot on here.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : Benny, ur now not reading my posts and I'm not getting into a playground spat with you.  I AGREED that the 10 seater tournies are enjoyed ( see sleepstack example).  This suggestion sounds good and is a constructive way to generate ideas and conversation  Posted by phil12uk

  • edited May 2010

    Is this a 'DELILAH' thread???.......(maybe only Stoke fans will get this!)
  • edited May 2010
    i am with you loony, not bothered either way. i loved the ds format and 6 mnths ago very popular. the only problem i had and i am sure many do is the time they were finishing. even when they were starting at 7, it was normally between 11 and 12 they were finishing. working on average 60hrs a week , and starting at 6 am, i was starting to find it tiring. having ds starting at 8 onwards be it 6 or 10 seats would really start eating into by bobo time. dont get me wrong, a well structured ds with the right buyin and the right amount of players to me would be the holy grail on sky. phil
  • edited May 2010
    Pods .. your right and the reasin was because the blinds levels  were to long ..
    "I mean seriously who wants a, "sleepystack" ?  ...with 15 or 20 min levels ..It hasn't  worked because it's  slow  and boring ...
     
    If  as I said,  10 seater, the levels at 10 mins with  a guarantee ( 5 places paid)  £200 for £10+1 or £50 for £2.50 +25p  

    Here's the thing, it's  a winning  formula because it's  not going to be toooo  slow in the early stages but gives value for money, and a chance of cashing for all by  paying 5 from 30 ..
  • edited May 2010
    why would you think that 6max deepstack tournys are a crapshoot compared to 10 seater ones? They are much better structured that the 10 seater ones or the tournys you would get at most local casinos. You get more hands per level. Or maybe you just don't like the greater skill needed for 6max
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    why would you think that 6max deepstack tournys are a crapshoot compared to 10 seater ones? They are much better structured that the 10 seater ones or the tournys you would get at most local casinos. You get more hands per level. Or maybe you just don't like the greater skill needed for 6max
    Posted by fishywishy
    At last  a comedian ..  someone who knows  what they are talking about .. 

    It's  OK 'fishywishy',    I'm a newbee to poker , so I have no real  knowledge of the game, I bow to your superior knowledge ... well said ...................... 
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : At last  a comedian ..  someone who knows  what they are talking about ..  It's  OK 'fishywishy',    I'm a newbee to poker , so I have no real  knowledge of the game, I bow to your superior knowledge ... well said ...................... 
    Posted by bennydip2
    Well that does explain a few things, like you stacking off  (by callin every street) with A5 on level 2 of the d/stack the over day
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : Well that does explain a few things, like you stacking off  (by callin every street) with A5 on level 2 of the d/stack the over day
    Posted by fishywishy
      but you could be right .. I would probably have done the same with 7-2 off' suite 

    However where did  I say as  you said, I think 6 seater deep stacks  are  a crap-shoot, your missing the  whole point of the thread,  oh and  welcome to the forum    :)
  • edited May 2010
    copied from your original post...

    It's not as if they  don't have the ability or know how in the technical  department,
    so  'Why oh Why' is EVERY tournament on here 6 seaters, whats wrong  with  giving the players  a variety and putting some proper 10 seater tournaments  on ...

    I'll  tell you  why, they want fast  games  fast  turnover, where the range of  hands  being played  are  much wider, enabling it to  be 'crap-shoot' poker, you only  have to  listen to  the analysts to  realise, with  their talk of,   'get it in' and 'shove'  ??
  • edited May 2010

    Two things  are happening here, either as I said,  the 'directors' of the company want to  keep things the way they are, enabling fast turnover, or they are being badly advised as to  what the customer really wants !! 

    I think you might find the customer wants 6 seater tournaments im sure it was discussed in a thread last year. You may well find your in the minority Benny.

    As for good players leaving the site thats always going to happen, a man of your experience should know this its normal for decent players to move on to other sites. Do you think the new players coming to the site cant play? Ive spoken to 2 players this week that are new to the site and are decent players with over 10 years of poker behind them. Its a revolving door im sure Sky wont lose sleep over it.

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    Two things  are happening here, either as I said,  the 'directors' of the company want to  keep things the way they are, enabling fast turnover, or they are being badly advised as to  what the customer really wants !!  I think you might find the customer wants 6 seater tournaments im sure it was discussed in a thread last year. You may well find your in the minority Benny. As for good players leaving the site thats always going to happen, a man of your experience should know this its normal for decent players to move on to other sites. Do you think the new players coming to the site cant play? Ive spoken to 2 players this week that are new to the site and are decent players with over 10 years of poker behind them. Its a revolving door im sure Sky wont lose sleep over it.
    Posted by tallboy

    Very True  Tallboy,   but then I'm always in the minority ...   So nothing changed there then  :)
  • edited May 2010
    Personally I prefer 6-max, but I'm a degenerate gambler ;o)

    But you're right Benny - more 10-max, and maybe some 8-max, tourneys would give us punters some more choice.

  • edited May 2010
    agree with benny here, 10 seaters do bring a higher standard of play due to the narrowing of the range of cards that SHOULD be played. paying 5 outta 30 is also good.
  • edited May 2010
    I'm astonished by the vitriol launched against Benny for daring to suggest that we might like to have 10 seater tourneys as opposed to the majority of 6 six seaters that are the norm on here. I don't play on here as often as I once used to,basically because of the 'oooh look I have an ace - let's shove all-in' mentality that seem to be more the norm these days on six handed tables.

    I can't comment on Benny's views as to the opinions of the directors of the Sky poker board but I do believe in Benny's right to voice an opinion. many sites sites do have a choice of 4/6/8/10 player tables and I think the point Benny is trying to make is that he would like to see that choice given on Sky poker.

    OK. it might not be that successful in an MTT format but perhaps more choices in say SNG's. I too get frustrated by the 'Let's shove all in on the first hand' mentality that seems to be the norm in turbo type tourneys so I can see where Benny is coming from.

    Benny, you've got my support mate!
  • edited May 2010
    Ha ha, .. as  Phil Lynott, once said, "The Boys  are Back In Town"    Thanks  guys,
     
    anyways just to prove I'm no one trick pony ..
    I still play the shootouts  sometimes  and ... :))

    Open Satellite

    Loading...

    Tournament Complete

    Finished at 16:55 - 08 May

    • 0
    • 1
    • :
    • 2
    • 3
    • :
    • 4
    • 5
    • :
    • 6
    • 7

    This is a TV-only game

    Starts At
    Started At
    Buy-In
    Running For
    Prize Pool
    Registered
    Players Left
    Chips
    Blind Limits
    Blinds
    Current
    Next
    In
    Stacks
    Largest
    Average
    Smallest
    1
    bennydip2 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    2
    reters19 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    3
    eon1961 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    4
    aspro - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    5
    getuptosin - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    6
    BlackToken - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    7
    felly11 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    8
    ELVIS66 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    9
    Mr_D_Gray - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    10
    8wizard8 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    11
    Trickrick - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    12
    mud66 - Entry to £5,000 Gtd. Open
    13
    how03 - £6.60

    Rebuys/Addons available

    1 player in 5 will win a seat into tonight's £5,000 Guaranteed Open at 8pm.


    So a good song to get me ready for tonight, remember this ... many a good tune is played on an old fiddle , and beware  when you  here ..   The  KINGS CALL  ..

      click  here />  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yxu1nVbHes

       
  • edited May 2010
    So a good song to get me ready for tonight, remember this ... many a good tune is played on an old fiddle , and beware  when you  here ..   The  KINGS CALL  ..

      click  here />  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yxu1nVbHes
       
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why??:
    In Response to Re: Why Oh Why Oh Why?? : Very True  Tallboy,   but then I'm always in the minority ...   So nothing changed there then  :)
    Posted by bennydip2
    Im not saying your wrong my just saying when the subject of 10 seater tables came up last year the majority wanted it 6 seater.
    You bring a great deal of humour to this site Benny and I for one read all of your post's unlike some which bore me to death. Having said that you do seem as if you have issues with Sky Poker for what reason im not quite sure. As Phil has said it comes across as your always moaning over something, this site in my opinion is better than any other for listening to its customers and majority rules! Try telling that to Gordon Brown!
    Good Luck at the tables.
Sign In or Register to comment.