You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?

edited May 2010 in Poker Chat


Certainly Poker is primarily a game of skill.  But rather than it being a game of luck, isn't it better that it's seen as a game of chance?


Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?  It seems to be a "half empty, half full" type of question where the answer might depend upon how positive you are.











«1

Comments

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    Certainly Poker is primarily a game of skill.   But rather than it being a game of luck , isn't it better that it's seen as a game of chance ? Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?  It seems to be a "half empty, half full" type of question where the answer might depend upon how positive you are.
    Posted by aussie09
    There is no 'Certainly' in poker..!!!, and I dispute the 'skill' in poker. Poker is about knowledge of the game,(and there is more to that than meets the eye) and of your opponents if possible,and then it is down to the 'LUCK' of the draw. All this cliche rubbish 'poker gods','thats poker' it's simply the coin flip or turn of the cards,playing cards that is.                                                                                                                   Kind regards
  • edited May 2010
    Ya its all skill long term. And there is no 'luck' it's better to see it as chance.
  • edited May 2010
    The words 'luck', 'chance' and 'skill' can all be used to describe individual poker hands.

    However, in my opinion 'skill' is only one of those three words that can be used to explain long-term results. The luck & chance even out over many thousands of hands, leaving skill alone to account for gains or losses.
  • edited May 2010
    Skill and Variance.

    Luck is just the word fish use that actually means variance.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    The words 'luck', 'chance' and 'skill' can all be used to describe individual poker hands. However, in my opinion 'skill' is only one of those three words that can be used to explain long-term results. The luck & chance even out over many thousands of hands, leaving skill alone to account for gains or losses.
    Posted by GaryQQQ
    Spot on Gary !
    But players do tend to moan more about "luck" than "chance". And when they moan long term it becomes evident perhaps they should be focusing on "skill" rather than either of the other two .

  • edited May 2010

    Other way round.

    Variance is just the word that snobby, over-rated big headed  pro's use that actually means luck.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    Other way round. Variance is just the word that snobby, over-rated big headed  pro's use that actually means luck.
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    Two different things.

    Variance is more about odds over a long period of time.
    Luck is about something that is random.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : Two different things. Variance is more about odds over a long period of time. Luck is about something that is random.
    Posted by MrWh1te
    What? So variance is only long term ?

    I think I am with Dohhh on this one !

    Variance is also a word used by average poker players to justify a lack of skill.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : What? So variance is only long term ?
    Posted by penguin7
    ok I will rephrase.

    variance is about odds and percentages that is best measured over a long period of time.
  • edited May 2010
     Every single time I have ever won a tournament it was pure skill, but every time I got knocked out of one it was bad luck, or some chancer having too much luck
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
     Every single time I have ever won a tournament it was pure skill, but every time I got knocked out of one it was bad luck, or some chancer having too much luck
    Posted by oynutter
    nice answer lol
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    Certainly Poker is primarily a game of skill.   But rather than it being a game of luck , isn't it better that it's seen as a game of chance ? Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?  It seems to be a "half empty, half full" type of question where the answer might depend upon how positive you are.
    Posted by aussie09
    I think that Clint Eastwood could some this all up as 'Dirty Harry'..... ''you feel lucky punk???...well do ya??''
  • edited May 2010



    great responses.  

    i was proposing two things.

    the most successful players are those who are most skillful
    there is a correlation between the least successful players and those players who talk of luck.




  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    great responses.   i was proposing two things. the most successful players are those who are most skillful there is a correlation between the least successful players and those players who talk of luck.
    Posted by aussie09
    All you supposedly good players...???,how many times has your supposedly skilful play...??? helped you on the RIVER...!!!,the RIVER can be,and often is,the killer of all this supposedly skilful play...!!!. All the pats on the back,good play dude etc etc, is nothing more than one player having more 'LUCK' than the other,nothing whatsoever to do with skill,it's the RIVER of 'LUCK' or the RIVER of 'MUCK'.                  Kind regards
  • edited May 2010
    poker is almost all luck in my opinion.Sure there is some skill involved but the only reason the big pros are where they are is because they are in the top say 0.5% of people luck wise.



    ....just my opinion of course :)
  • edited May 2010
    lets say i played say dantb over a million hands who would you think would come out on top,dan would of cause because hes more skillful at the game than i am by a long shot too,so skill very much comes into it,tho you still need the luck element to win
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    lets say i played say dantb over a million hands who would you think would come out on top,dan would of cause because hes more skillful at the game than i am by a long shot too,so skill very much comes into it,tho you still need the luck element to win
    Posted by stokefc
    That only applies to h/u play on a six seater table over a million hands it WOULD be more luck than skill.gl dav
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : That only applies to h/u play on a six seater table over a million hands it WOULD be more luck than skill.gl dav
    Posted by dav1964
    That really depends on the difference in skill levels.
    Over 1 million hands I would expect any significant skill advantage to certainly be evident.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : All you supposedly good players...???,how many times has your supposedly skilful play...??? helped you on the RIVER...!!!,the RIVER can be,and often is,the killer of all this supposedly skilful play...!!!. All the pats on the back,good play dude etc etc, is nothing more than one player having more 'LUCK' than the other,nothing whatsoever to do with skill,it's the RIVER of 'LUCK' or the RIVER of 'MUCK'.                  Kind regards
    Posted by ALIVEHAT60
    Luck does of course play a part in poker. However, luck is equal to all players in the long run. Luck may play a part over a short period but between two players it will even out over time, just as tossing a coin will even out over time. If a player wins a tournament with a field of 500 players he will need to have some luck to achieve that. Being lucky against all those players however is unlikely but as in bingo it can and does happen that by pure chance one player prevails against all others. If that same player again plays the same 500 man tournament and wins it then the chances of it being pure luck diminish. If that same player continues on and over a period wins 20, or 30 or 50 tournaments of 500 players then the luck factor goes out of the window. Similarly for a cash player who over an extended period shows a profit. It cannot be down to luck.

    If it were just down to luck then the tournament player who has defied odds of 500/1 on 50 occasions has achieved odds 25,000/1 and the number of individual hands he has won through luck would be astronomical. Luck affects all players but it's the skill factor that separates them into winners and losers. 

    I've won a few tournaments in my time but at the moment I can't win a hand......... does that make me lucky or unlucky?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : Luck does of course play a part in poker. However, luck is equal to all players in the long run. Luck may play a part over a short period but between two players it will even out over time, just as tossing a coin will even out over time. If a player wins a tournament with a field of 500 players he will need to have some luck to achieve that. Being lucky against all those players however is unlikely but as in bingo it can and does happen that by pure chance one player prevails against all others. If that same player again plays the same 500 man tournament and wins it then the chances of it being pure luck diminish. If that same player continues on and over a period wins 20, or 30 or 50 tournaments of 500 players then the luck factor goes out of the window. Similarly for a cash player who over an extended period shows a profit. It cannot be down to luck. If it were just down to luck then the tournament player who has defied odds of 500/1 on 50 occasions has achieved odds 25,000/1 and the number of individual hands he has won through luck would be astronomical. Luck affects all players but it's the skill factor that separates them into winners and losers.  I've won a few tournaments in my time but at the moment I can't win a hand......... does that make me lucky or unlucky?
    Posted by elsadog
    To be strictly accurate, the results from tossing a coin are likely to even out over time - there is no law that says that they will.

    The odds of defying 500/1 on 50 occasions are much larger than 25,000/1 which, in fact, would be the odds of doing it twice (approximately).
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : To be strictly accurate, the results from tossing a coin are likely to even out over time - there is no law that says that they will . The odds of defying 500/1 on 50 occasions are much larger than 25,000/1 which, in fact, would be the odds of doing it twice (approximately).
    Posted by MereNovice
    ''sigh''

    I don't do maths but the principle stands just the same.

    But hold on a minute ........ each game is individually 500/1 (499/1) and are seperate not cumulative. Isn't this the same as buying 2 lottery tickets as opposed to one, your chances of hitting all 6 numbers remain the same ........... Or am I having a senior moment?
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : ''sigh'' I don't do maths but the principle stands just the same. But hold on a minute ........ each game is individually 500/1 (499/1) and are seperate not cumulative. Isn't this the same as buying 2 lottery tickets as opposed to one, your chances of hitting all 6 numbers remain the same ........... Or am I having a senior moment?
    Posted by elsadog
    I will assume that your "sigh" is in response to my comment on the expectation of only being about level after 1 million coin flips.  The distinction may seem subtle to you but it is important to point it out - particularly to some people that believe that a 50/50 shot means that they will win every second coin flip (or even that they must win a hand if the odds are 98% in their favour).
    In the theory of an infinite universe (which I believe you are partial to) it is a fact that there will be someone (in fact an infinite number of people) who will lose 1 million coin flips in a row.  This, indeed, would be "bad luck" or "negative variance" if you prefer to use the pseudo-scientific terminology that some poker players like to give to this sort of thing.


    The odds of winning the lottery if you buy two tickets for the same week is half that of winning if you buy one lottery ticket (assuming that you don't buy two tickets with the same number). The odds of winning the lottery twice if buying a ticket for two successive weeks is obtained by multiplying the odds of each event together. To do it 50 times in a row you would have to multiply the odds of all 50 events together - that would be a very large number.
  • edited May 2010

    Poker is a game of chance as per the courts  (i also don't really get the distinction here between luck and chance?? they are used to mean the same thing in the context of casino or gambling games like this)

    Is it a good thing that poker is a game of chance? Yes because otherwise you would have to pay taxes on your winnings.

    Is there skill in the game? Of course but you can't neutralise the luck and therefore it has more chance involved in the game than most decent players are giving credit for here.

    The skills involved are deception and reading - disguise your hand, find his / her range - anything else is the luck of the draw so to speak.

    And Variance is Luck / Chance - The amount of times you are outdrawn or outdraw to win a hand when the odds are in your favour or theirs so call it what you will but lets not all pretend that this game can be won on skill alone. If it could then you would see Ivey and Daniel, Hellmuth and various other faces lining the main event final table every year and internet qualifiers would not get a look in. But in this game of great variance / chance / luck there is hope for all and not just the Gods of the game

  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : I will assume that your "sigh" is in response to my comment on the expectation of only being about level after 1 million coin flips.  The distinction may seem subtle to you but it is important to point it out - particularly to some people that believe that a 50/50 shot means that they will win every second coin flip (or even that they must win a hand if the odds are 98% in their favour). In the theory of an infinite universe (which I believe you are partial to) it is a fact that there will be someone (in fact an infinite number of people) who will lose 1 million coin flips in a row.  This, indeed, would be "bad luck" or "negative variance" if you prefer to use the pseudo-scientific terminology that some poker players like to give to this sort of thing. The odds of winning the lottery if you buy two tickets for the same week is half that of winning if you buy one lottery ticket (assuming that you don't buy two tickets with the same number). The odds of winning the lottery twice if buying a ticket for two successive weeks is obtained by multiplying the odds of each event together. To do it 50 times in a row you would have to multiply the odds of all 50 events together - that would be a very large number.
    Posted by MereNovice
    My 'sigh' was because when I typed it I knew it was probably inaccurate.

    I do take issue regarding the lottery tickets though. I spent some time working with Camelot when the lottery was initiated (I was a consultant re. the lottery tickets and how to produce them) and during that time I spoke to a senior Camelot person who had worked on the outline theory of the lottery. He was most adamant that no matter how many tickets you bought in any given week the odds of winning remained unchanged. In other words at odds of say 14 million to one the odds remain the same whether you buy one, one hundred, or 14 million. Each ticket is equal in chance and cannot be 'halved' because you buy two. If you buy every combination of numbers only one will win the jackpot and the rest will lose. Therefore the odds are unchanged. I don't mean to argue overly on this point, I am only repeating what I was told ..... I still have difficulty with it, but I believe it.

    If I buy one ticket there are 13,999,999 other combinations that can win. If I buy two tickets there are still 13,999,999 combinations against each ticket. The best that could be argued is that the odds have reduced to 2 chances in 14,000,000. That doesn't halve the odds surely. If it did then buying 4 tickets would reduce it by the same amount and after a small number of further tickets I would be at evens to win. That doesn't compute.

    We have now gone totally off subject :o) ............. something I do a lot lately.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    Is it a good thing that poker is a game of chance? Yes because otherwise you would have to pay taxes on your winnings.
    Oh, I've just changed my mind, poker is definitely as game of chance.
  • edited May 2010
      One of the most important issues when it comes down to the debate over skill and luck is how you define the game itself. If you just consider poker to be a card game then it is heavily skewed in the favour of the luckiest player will win. But if you consider the fact that poker is in fact a game of the mind played with cards then the skill factor will begin to shine through.

     When you play the game the skill comes from knowing which hands to play and from what position,when to bet and when to fold.You find out who you can outplay and who has the advantage over you.
     On the table screen there are buttons that define the type of player that you are and whether you rely on your skill or just luck. The raise/bet/fold buttons are used by the more skillful players whereas overuse of the call button is a player who is relying on being lucky.

      Luck only comes to the forefront when the hand goes to showdown and you see who has the best hand but your skill factor should determine which hands you let get this far

     In the short term any player is capable of getting the better of any other player but in the long term superior skill will come through and win.
     So in my opinion it is a game of skill when you look at it in the long term and not just over one session or one week.But unfortunately most of us are unable to view it long term and only see short term profits or losses to judge our own game.
  • edited May 2010
    Top answer Talon !

    The poker gods have no say in the pots we win without showing our cards.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    Top answer Talon ! The poker gods have no say in the pots we win without showing our cards.
    Posted by penguin7
    Thus my comment on the main skill sets being deception and range finding, but this game has a lot of luck involved which no one can deny.

    Of course there is skill, you get good and bad players but each can stand and leave the table on the turn of a card even if 96% in front.

    I'm not claiming there is no skill in poker, i like it because it's one of the few ways to gamble where you can actually influence the outcome irrelevant of your holding. But the open isn't won by the same guy every night, week, month or even more than once a year very often. And when it is i doubt you could track through the hand history and say they got there without luck playing it's part

    The game is a wonderful combination of both - Enjoy it for what it is
  • edited May 2010
    Alan,

    I fear that we are talking at cross purposes - or your colleague was talking tosh!

    Buying two tickets (with different sets of numbers) on the same week does, indeed, halve your odds of winning (and buying four would quarter them).
    The odds of each individual ticket winning do not change but your overall odds change.
    The logical conclusion from this is that, if you bought a ticket with every single combination of numbers, then you would be guaranteed to "win the lottery".   :-0)))

    If you want to pursue this further, please PM me as I appear to have hijacked another thread.
  • edited May 2010
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance?:
    In Response to Re: Skill and Luck or Skill and Chance? : I will assume that your "sigh" is in response to my comment on the expectation of only being about level after 1 million coin flips.  The distinction may seem subtle to you but it is important to point it out - particularly to some people that believe that a 50/50 shot means that they will win every second coin flip (or even that they must win a hand if the odds are 98% in their favour). In the theory of an infinite universe (which I believe you are partial to) it is a fact that there will be someone (in fact an infinite number of people) who will lose 1 million coin flips in a row.  This, indeed, would be "bad luck" or "negative variance" if you prefer to use the pseudo-scientific terminology that some poker players like to give to this sort of thing. The odds of winning the lottery if you buy two tickets for the same week is half that of winning if you buy one lottery ticket (assuming that you don't buy two tickets with the same number). The odds of winning the lottery twice if buying a ticket for two successive weeks is obtained by multiplying the odds of each event together. To do it 50 times in a row you would have to multiply the odds of all 50 events together - that would be a very large number.
    Posted by MereNovice
    Hang on... surely it is not a fact that there will be someone who will lose 1 million coin flips in a row, it will merely just be a possibility?
Sign In or Register to comment.