I cant ever see a fold here Greg. With pre flop play I dont put him on aces, but with your potential extension I think a fold is too tight yeah. They are not doing this with made nut flush so I dont think you can be too worried
I get stacked here Greg. He's made a lovely flat pre to totally disguise his hand. I would also of initially raised the first bettor on the flop which would have given me pause for fault when I get shoved on but I think a call is still correct. It's just lovely play and a perfect flop for the villain.
your raise preflop was not enough gregg me personally i raise more pre flop with premium hands then the standerd 3 x big blinds u do in tourneys that flop u dont know where u are but u was unlucky the villain played it perfect just calling your raise and not re raiseing u better luck next time
Wow unlucky there gregg i cant really see a fold there, i agree maybe raise the initial raiser on the flop but still cant fold when the guy shoves. Tbh if i was villian i would be thinking how sweet would it be for the guy to have KK with a diamond,ones of those hands with the flop that are designed for someone to stack off.
why do you flat the flop if you are willing to get it in anyway :S Posted by BlackFish3
Yes i would normally raise here and perhaps should have, but i flatted because i didnt want to scare off the guy that bet out 2.40. He was very very agro, and would have hapilly fired another two streets with air and i would have got paid.
The villian was lucky that he didnt lose his customer and that he got me to call his massive reshove. i hadnt really noticed him tbh. (in hindsight he is obviously a bit of a shark)
I was so close to folding, but just clicked call as the timer was running out! a bit more time to think and i might have chucked it! (im such a nit!)
As for not raising X3 with premium hands, well i vary my raise sizes, so sometimes ill raise X3 sometimes X4, or more (for disguise) Normally im fairly comfortable folding a massive hand like this if i get the right signals so i dont think the preflop raise size matters a great deal. But in this case i guess this a real cooler. im still hurting having called off 150 bbs with 2 outs though! i hate calling massive bets like this and i could never put him on AA with A diamonds. well played villian.
In Response to Re: is this "getoffable"? : Yes i would normally raise here and perhaps should have, but i flatted because i didnt want to scare off the guy that bet out 2.40. He was very very agro, and would have hapilly fired another two streets with air and i would have got paid. The villian was lucky that he didnt lose his customer and that he got me to call his massive reshove. i hadnt really noticed him tbh. (in hindsight he is obviously a bit of a shark) I was so close to folding, but just clicked call as the timer was running out! a bit more time to think and i might have chucked it! As for not raising X3 with premium hands,well i vary my raise sizes, so sometimes ill raise X3 sometimes X4, or more (for disguise) Normally im fairly comfortable folding a massive hand like this if i get the right signals so i dont think the preflop raise size matters a great deal. But in this case i guess this a real cooler. im still hurting having called off 150 bbs with 2 outs though! i hate calling massive bets like this and i could never put him on AA with A diamonds. well played villian. thank you everyone for your comments. Posted by GREGHOGG
After last night i also no your a fan of the min raise late in tournies...even though your friend isn't
In Response to Re: is this "getoffable"? : After last night i also no your a fan of the min raise late in tournies...even though your friend isn't Posted by robc
lol, i only min raised to annoy chompy!! (and because it was correct in those situations) and yes, in certian situations the min raise is effective imo but chompers hates it in all scenarios
you're calling off 150bb on 2nd nut flush draw...yes its getoffable!
you are only beating 3 hands far as i can see Ad8x, AdTx, Ad4x. Hes never shoving with with worse unless u have reads hes a maniac. wait for a better spot
I cant ever see a fold here Greg. With pre flop play I dont put him on aces, but with your potential extension I think a fold is too tight yeah. They are not doing this with made nut flush so I dont think you can be too worried Posted by Boonicon
I agree here greg, u have the k dimonds and im happy 2 get it in on this flop. You were just unlucky and i like the flat call by the villian with AA pre flop especially if you say the other guy has been a bit crazy
Well im gonna assume I have 9 outs twice, even against sets, whats what 36%?- Minus whatever it is for him to fill up - yeh im happy to take that chance - im ahead lots of the time against the bare ace, or ace ten, JJ with a diamond, QQ with a diamond....
What Im saying is Im comfortable making the call. If I know Im ahead 5 times, and behind 5 times, Ill call 10 times - coz im never THAT far behind unless he has the 1 hand that it turned out he had.
Just ul. Rebuy. Game on.
Edit it wud be 9 outs once and 8 outs once? so 34% ?
if he flopped the flush and you think your K of diamonds will give you a better flush if you hit one on the turn and river you are only around 30% likely to hit.
You have only £3 in there. Surely there are better spots for you to get your other £30 in.
I would fold, but it might be the right move to call if some of these players above are saying call.
Post reads and previous battles with villain, if you dont have any pay more attention. Raise flop, only ever folding if villain is a rock and we are deep. Posted by ajs4385
fair point, no reads and no battles with villian. i had my eye on one other player in particular who i thought i could stack... how ironic
raise flop, yes i agree. if i hadnt thought i could play the hand better i wouldnt have started this thread. Im not a multi table high limit player like you, so im pleased that you have posted. thanks.
what im trying to point out is it IS my natural instinct to fold here, BUT, i made a "gamblers" call because i thought it might be mathmatically or technically correct (over time) rather like dohhhhhh is implying.... maybe im thinking about the game too much and i should just stick with my natural instincts... hmmmm
Its ok Gregg, I dont post much cos most threads in this setion are look at me I have had a bad beat. If no reads I am getting it in on flop.
As for Mr Miyagi, we are getting it in because villain could quite easily have a worse pair with a diamond. Also there is hardly any hands where we are crushed. If you only get it in when you have the nuts or near nuts you are not going to get paid off by anybody with two poker brain cells to rub together.
As for villain he played it terrible by not 3 betting pre this should have all gone in pre flop.
I think its a fold TBH but its pretty close, his range for doing this could include sets and two pairs and even his bluff range is going to have the ace of diamonds which means the villian will have around 46% equity against us. When calling the only hands we are hoping to see here is jj and qq. (villian might not even push with those hands as 20nl players are generally passive as seen pre flop)
I've read everyone else's comments thus far and I still think it's a call. Let's have a close look at the villain. They flat a standard preflop raise on the button (which of course widen's the blind's calling range and encourages a multi-way pot). Then to a raise and a flat they overbet shove the lot into the middle. There is no way to put him on pocket aces here, and pocket aces with the Ad is the only hand we are really in bad shape against. If this happened to me I think they have either made the flush but not the nut flush or more likely they have AdX (leaning towards AdKX & AdQx). If I had AdKx in the villian's spot, I know I'm squeezing or folding. To Lynx and others, yes I know you are also never in great shape (unless you've got some crazy fool with KT) but you have a good edge in enough spots to make it a call. FWIW this is turning out to be one of the better discussions in the clinic.
I've read everyone else's comments thus far and I still think it's a call. Let's have a close look at the villain. They flat a standard preflop raise on the button (which of course widen's the blind's calling range and encourages a multi-way pot). Then to a raise and a flat they overbet shove the lot into the middle. There is no way to put him on pocket aces here, and pocket aces with the Ad is the only hand we are really in bad shape against. If this happened to me I think they have either made the flush but not the nut flush or more likely they have AdX (leaning towards AdKX & AdQx). If I had AdKx in the villian's spot, I know I'm squeezing or folding. To Lynx and others, yes I know you are also never in great shape (unless you've got some crazy fool with KT) but you have a good edge in enough spots to make it a call. FWIW this is turning out to be one of the better discussions in the clinic. Posted by TommyD
I want to make it absolutely clear that i did not intend this to be a "bad beat" or a moany thread... in fact, far from it!
I am not a great player, but i do aspire to become one in the very long term. My motivation behind posting this hand was to find out whether this was a complete no brainer call... do i worry too much about getting my money in?
Or, was i right to be hesitant but right to ultimately call because of the likelihood of being ahead over time? Or should i just know im behind and fold?
The greatest players in the world can save money when placed in situations such as this. And i would dearly have loved to have found the fold that i so wanted to make... but even if i did, would it have been the right fold in a cash players mindset??? this is what i find interesting because im not a cash player, and my sng and mtt background wants to find the fold...
One could of course trivialise this and say its just down to AA vs KK and all the money goes in. Imo, this is a very simplistic and does not take into account the stacks of 150bbs + each. The thing is, i want to save every penny i can, that is my mindset when i think i could be behind. Others choose to gamble, i will always aim to try to find a way of getting out of a situation when i could be behind, maybe i am wrong...
I think its a fold TBH but its pretty close, his range for doing this could include sets and two pairs and even his bluff range is going to have the ace of diamonds which means the villian will have around 46% equity against us. When calling the only hands we are hoping to see here is jj and qq. (villian might not even push with those hands as 20nl players are generally passive as seen pre flop) Posted by DeuceAK-47
After further analysis this post is wrong and it is actually a easy call.
With the money we have already put in the pot we need 43.31% equity to call and agaisnt this range TT-AA,88,44,t8s,t8o we have 56.7% equity,also you have to include all the Adx hands which we have 55% equity against.
Even if the villian would push with all the smaller made flush hands (which is debatable) there is not enough hand combinations to make this a fold.
In Response to Re: is this "getoffable"? : After further analysis this post is wrong and it is actually a easy call. With the money we have already put in the pot we need 43.31% equity to call and agaisnt this range TT-AA,88,44,t8s,t8o we have 56.7% equity,also you have to include all the Adx hands which we have 55% equity against. Even if the villian would push with all the smaller made flush hands (which is debatable) there is not enough hand combinations to make this a fold. Posted by DeuceAK-47
lol you had a couple of hours to make your mind up, i only had 15 seconds:)
im glad people have found this interesting I want to make it absolutely clear that i did not intend this to be a "bad beat" or a moany thread... in fact, far from it! I am not a great player, but i do aspire to become one in the very long term. My motivation behind posting the hand in question was to find out whether this was a complete no brainer call... do i worry too much about getting my money in? Or, was i right to be hesitant but right to ultimately call because of the likelihood of being ahead over time? Or should i just know im behind and fold? The greatest players in the world can save money when placed in situations such as this. And i would dearly have loved to have found the fold that i so wanted to make... but even if i did, would it have been the right fold in a cash players mindset??? this is what i find interesting because im not a cash player, and my sng and mtt background wants to find the fold... love it, thanks guys... Posted by GREGHOGG
Greg,
I am finding it hard to put what I want to say into words but here go's. Perhaps this hand is a cooler, but I think that you can get off coolers, and obviously this is dependent on the situation. I try to discount the "this is +ve in the long run" mindset, primarily because I'm a nit that hates to lose any amount, no matter how small. So I tend to play on instincts, which are correct most of the time. With no reads on the player, however, this all goes out the window. You have to either go on the maths, or just fold and say that you can find a better spot later on.
Having said all of that, and coming from a micro-stakes background, I would find it almost impossible to find a fold in 15 seconds.
Comments
The villian was lucky that he didnt lose his customer and that he got me to call his massive reshove. i hadnt really noticed him tbh. (in hindsight he is obviously a bit of a shark)
I was so close to folding, but just clicked call as the timer was running out! a bit more time to think and i might have chucked it! (im such a nit!)
As for not raising X3 with premium hands, well i vary my raise sizes, so sometimes ill raise X3 sometimes X4, or more (for disguise) Normally im fairly comfortable folding a massive hand like this if i get the right signals so i dont think the preflop raise size matters a great deal. But in this case i guess this a real cooler. im still hurting having called off 150 bbs with 2 outs though! i hate calling massive bets like this and i could never put him on AA with A diamonds. well played villian.
thank you everyone for your comments.
each to their own
Post reads and previous battles with villain, if you dont have any pay more attention.
Raise flop, only ever folding if villain is a rock and we are deep.
Well im gonna assume I have 9 outs twice, even against sets, whats what 36%?- Minus whatever it is for him to fill up - yeh im happy to take that chance - im ahead lots of the time against the bare ace, or ace ten, JJ with a diamond, QQ with a diamond....
What Im saying is Im comfortable making the call. If I know Im ahead 5 times, and behind 5 times, Ill call 10 times - coz im never THAT far behind unless he has the 1 hand that it turned out he had.
Just ul. Rebuy. Game on.
Edit it wud be 9 outs once and 8 outs once? so 34% ?
if he flopped the flush and you think your K of diamonds will give you a better flush if you hit one on the turn and river you are only around 30% likely to hit.
You have only £3 in there. Surely there are better spots for you to get your other £30 in.
I would fold, but it might be the right move to call if some of these players above are saying call.
raise flop, yes i agree. if i hadnt thought i could play the hand better i wouldnt have started this thread. Im not a multi table high limit player like you, so im pleased that you have posted. thanks.
what im trying to point out is it IS my natural instinct to fold here, BUT, i made a "gamblers" call because i thought it might be mathmatically or technically correct (over time) rather like dohhhhhh is implying.... maybe im thinking about the game too much and i should just stick with my natural instincts... hmmmm
Its ok Gregg, I dont post much cos most threads in this setion are look at me I have had a bad beat. If no reads I am getting it in on flop.
As for Mr Miyagi, we are getting it in because villain could quite easily have a worse pair with a diamond. Also there is hardly any hands where we are crushed. If you only get it in when you have the nuts or near nuts you are not going to get paid off by anybody with two poker brain cells to rub together.
As for villain he played it terrible by not 3 betting pre this should have all gone in pre flop.
I think its a fold TBH but its pretty close, his range for doing this could include sets and two pairs and even his bluff range is going to have the ace of diamonds which means the villian will have around 46% equity against us.
When calling the only hands we are hoping to see here is jj and qq. (villian might not even push with those hands as 20nl players are generally passive as seen pre flop)
Let's have a close look at the villain. They flat a standard preflop raise on the button (which of course widen's the blind's calling range and encourages a multi-way pot).
Then to a raise and a flat they overbet shove the lot into the middle.
There is no way to put him on pocket aces here, and pocket aces with the Ad is the only hand we are really in bad shape against. If this happened to me I think they have either made the flush but not the nut flush or more likely they have AdX (leaning towards AdKX & AdQx). If I had AdKx in the villian's spot, I know I'm squeezing or folding.
To Lynx and others, yes I know you are also never in great shape (unless you've got some crazy fool with KT) but you have a good edge in enough spots to make it a call.
FWIW this is turning out to be one of the better discussions in the clinic.
I want to make it absolutely clear that i did not intend this to be a "bad beat" or a moany thread... in fact, far from it!
I am not a great player, but i do aspire to become one in the very long term. My motivation behind posting this hand was to find out whether this was a complete no brainer call... do i worry too much about getting my money in?
Or, was i right to be hesitant but right to ultimately call because of the likelihood of being ahead over time? Or should i just know im behind and fold?
The greatest players in the world can save money when placed in situations such as this. And i would dearly have loved to have found the fold that i so wanted to make... but even if i did, would it have been the right fold in a cash players mindset??? this is what i find interesting because im not a cash player, and my sng and mtt background wants to find the fold...
One could of course trivialise this and say its just down to AA vs KK and all the money goes in. Imo, this is a very simplistic and does not take into account the stacks of 150bbs + each. The thing is, i want to save every penny i can, that is my mindset when i think i could be behind. Others choose to gamble, i will always aim to try to find a way of getting out of a situation when i could be behind, maybe i am wrong...
love it, thanks guys...
With the money we have already put in the pot we need 43.31% equity to call and agaisnt this range TT-AA,88,44,t8s,t8o we have 56.7% equity,also you have to include all the Adx hands which we have 55% equity against.
Even if the villian would push with all the smaller made flush hands (which is debatable) there is not enough hand combinations to make this a fold.
I am finding it hard to put what I want to say into words but here go's. Perhaps this hand is a cooler, but I think that you can get off coolers, and obviously this is dependent on the situation. I try to discount the "this is +ve in the long run" mindset, primarily because I'm a nit that hates to lose any amount, no matter how small. So I tend to play on instincts, which are correct most of the time. With no reads on the player, however, this all goes out the window. You have to either go on the maths, or just fold and say that you can find a better spot later on.
Having said all of that, and coming from a micro-stakes background, I would find it almost impossible to find a fold in 15 seconds.
Interesting hand.
Will