Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!
Chris Oliver in PCA. Genius or prime douche? (asked lightheartedly as answer is clear) :p
Just been watching this am's FT episode. This guy has annoyed me no end throughout, today especially. Pretty much everything thats wrong with poker.
My favourite quotes by him:
"Yeah they say the monkeys playing every hand again, but its ok as I'm winning every hand".
Three betting as standard with less than rags, but running so hot it doesnt matter. This guy will likely win this tournament but be bankrupt for rest of his life wondering why he cant catch 2 outers every hand.
Favourite quotes from others:
"This hand is a clown short of a circus" and "Chris Oliver has been sleeping with a simple minded leprechaun and the dumb luck has rubbed all over him". Very well said.
Only got up to the point where he 3 bes Sowers with 82 on the button, flopping 2pr (awful flat pre by Sowers though).
Lets see what else happens.....
0 ·
Comments
Just watched end of PCA, very very exciting HU battle and thoroughly enjoyed it, wont say anything else if others havent seen it.
Truly great commentary by Mr Hartigan. I know they edit it in afterwards but its always quality hearing the contempt in a commentators voice towards the idiot spewy players
To be fair to Mr Oliver he seems to do ok at this poker malarky, and to his credit he was probably the most entertaining player to watch, although I have to say Mr Moneymaker came across as a very nice bloke, who probably deserves a bit more credit than he tends to get.
Really lol? Dont quite know what to say to that
Really was on edge of my seat waiting for the car crash. Hall played amazing well throughout.
Knew Oliver was going to fillup on river in that crucial hand. Against Oliver thats an amazing fold. I think most people would realise Oliver wasnt bluffing there but its a really hard fold regardless.
If bets bets half pot at turn tournements over on river.
Moneymaker had Oliver in his pocket till they switched tables last week, then it was down and out for moneymaker as he thought everyone was at it ( as oliver was ) and Oliver just kept hitting and knocking out everyone.
p.s when oliver moved tables he was short stacked
Lol I was hoping you'd see this
It was funny to watch as most generic american commentators would have picked Oliver apart but it was just so much better done with the British reserve. Could tell you wanted say alot more but it almost seemed like you felt sad and exsasperated for the guy
What you say about him self destructing was clear. After that second double up it didnt seem as though he knew what hit him. He'd been so stacked for so long he was just playing monopoly money chip poker, you can just see that he loose the plot completely. Oliver and Hall were just polar opposites of skill and patience.
What did Negranue make of him when it airing live?
MoneyMaker was the only person that seemed to read him well. If I remember right he only developed his stack by catching real slim lines then making a mahoosive 3 or 4 bet allin pre with 8's vs K's, binking the flop. Again, without intending to be rude I dont think I saw any real skill or finesse based play.
Conversley, an argument could be made that fearlessly 3 betting pre isnt the worst approach. However doing it when your image is shot to hell is never going to be that smart...................unless you ran as hot as he did.
Myeh...Just as everyone has a great book in them, I guess everyone has a great MTT in them
"Conversley, an argument could be made that fearlessly 3 betting pre isnt the worst approach. However doing it when your image is shot to hell is never going to be that smart.................." - This might have been enlightening if you had read on.
I hear what your saying but if you think 3betting 8's massive for your whole stack is skillful, or drawing to slim lines is skillfull, or continually getting it in bad.....or 3 betting pre super weak when image is shot to hell is skillful then thats your choice.
Maybe his online game isnt quite as bad as this. Its easy to lose your head a little with a stack that big. But if you find anything admirable in his approach to this tornament then you are a "choose your own word".
He simply luckboxed his way through for the most part in this PCA. Maybe he plays differently in other games but I find it shocking that you would defend it.
Yes very aggro, being very aggro with alot of money on the line can be a great approach.
He got very lucky many times. He wasnt vieing to put himself into a position to win through any higher thinking, just aimlessly 3 betting hoping to squek hands through. Firing bullets in all directions with no real thought process.
This is why a logical thinking player like Hall was always going to pick him apart with a 4/1 chip defecit.
I give up.
You come straight in firing contempt and insults, believing that all other POV's are inferior to your own.
Not really interested in speaking to you again.
if oliver had raised his house against straight hand instead of shoving, hall would have shoved, that was the hand that turned it all round.
p.s you are spot on james, oliver actually says he didn`t get in till after 5 in the morning ( he was wasted )
The content of your post is fantasy, I dont believe I've ever said anything like that.
If you actually look I say more than once daize may play diff online (as in better), or was paticularly spewy in this individual game, rather than him being a bad player.
Feel free to actually discuss the pros and cons of what he was doing rather than just complaning that i'm so nasty for trying to enlighten you as to why your blinkered opinion is wrong.