You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc

edited August 2011 in The Poker Clinic
Only mentioning LOLRAISE because he's one of the few who priveledges us with an answer.

Closest you boys have come to going bust? I, obviously, know nothing about youse.

But has it ever come close to considering a different career? Even with your edge has it run so bad you've considered something else?
«1

Comments

  • edited August 2011
    I'm not a pro lol but I'd imagine it's be almost impossible to go broke if you use proper bankroll management as if you lose too much you simply move down a level. Of course some people have an ego which prevents them from doing this so that could be a factor in losing it all.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    I'm not a pro lol but I'd imagine it's be almost impossible to go broke if you use proper bankroll management as if you lose too much you simply move down a level. Of course some people have an ego which prevents them from doing this so that could be a factor in losing it all.
    Posted by Dudeskin8
    I agree with this as a few months ago i noticed a reg 25/50 nlhe who was playing 4/8 and 5/10 where i was playing and now appears to have moved back UP
  • edited August 2011
    I think I've heard LOLUFOLD describe himself as a bankroll nit so it's very unlikely he's been busto through bad BRM.
  • edited August 2011

    Put it in the "Ask team sky poker" thing, much more likely to get answers there. 

    They prob all did several times when they had BR's of 1k or less......But then they wouldn't have been as good then as they are now. 

    Lol raise was down at nl50 a while back but within a couple of months was back at 500nl+, winning every sky roller, and on his way to Vegas. 

    They could all probably fall back on nl50 and beat it as easily as I can beat nl4. Which makes me wanna cry as nl50 kicks my bot bot! haaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

    Also means it's prob impossible for them to go broke from where they are now, unless they go mental.


  • edited August 2011
    I would say that the globe is littered with 'pros' that have gone busto and some that owe every tom d ick and harry a lot of money.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    I would say that the globe is littered with 'pros' that have gone busto and some that owe every tom d ick and harry a lot of money.
    Posted by loonytoons
    Chino Reem anyone?
    Google Chino Reem and probation and read about players waiting for him at the casino to cash out after his win in the Epic Poker League.
  • edited August 2011
    You'll probz find they have gone broke at some time
    I'd imagine they'll have at least 40 BI for their level which makes it quite difficult to go broke -  these players probz have an edge on most players on Sky anyway 
  • edited August 2011
    Matasow is perma broke, he'd be the first to admit it.

    Everyone goes broke from time to time.

    There are truly exceptional people that dont and huge respect to them.

    BRM is the hardest thing to get right IMO.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    You'll probz find they have gone broke at some time I'd imagine they'll have at least 40 BI for their level which makes it quite difficult to go broke -  these players probz have an edge on most players on Sky anyway 
    Posted by percival09
    Lol, keep dreamin.
  • edited August 2011
    95% of pros bust the roll early in there career - high risk reward for the big spin in cash or big win in a MTT will set you up - I remember reading or hearing about Daniel Negreuno who went bust 2-3 times early when he was trying to crack Vegas

    You will always get the 5% who start with £50 and spin it into 100,000 in one year but thats really run good and spin up big with max risk, like 50% of you BR on a cash table.


    Once you have a nice roll then you can stop the gamble and just manage your Bankroll.
    You could spin up with a bit of luck, one big MTT win will either let you play slightly higher and maintain a win ratio or just play too big and dump your money on table full of better players which 80% of winners do.
    In this game the money tends to filter up the stakes in cash to the high rollers, the little fish get eaten and the fat fish just get fatter.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc : Lol, keep dreamin.
    Posted by loonytoons
    I am sure they stay within 2-5% of the BR on the table at any one time




  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc : Lol, keep dreamin.
    Posted by loonytoons
    I'm pretty sure if they grind 10+ tables, and want to make a living out of it (obv do if they are pros) then they will def have at least 40 BI's

  • edited August 2011

    I reckon ur looking at 100x buy ins at least.

    Probably 250 bi +

    Obviously not the best example, but reds was playing 200nl all the time before he won 200k in Vegas.

    Now he plays, 200nl.

  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    I reckon ur looking at 100x buy ins at least. Probably 250 bi + Obviously not the best example, but reds was playing 200nl all the time before he won 200k in Vegas. Now he plays, 200nl.
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    100x buy in's is 1% of BR
    250 is 0.4% so yeah thats a BR nit )

    obviously 50,000 is not his entire BR so he is a massive BR nit




  • edited August 2011
    i lost 2/3rds my roll in the first week of 2010 ~$27k. i still had a winning month though which was pretty amazing

    2010 was terrible for me, went on 60bi downswing over 6week period in oct/nov ( />half of this is due to tilt/spew bad play etc) when i started taking shots at nl400. ended up underolled for nl100.

    br nit /> no br
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    i lost 2/3rds my roll in the first week of 2010 ~$27k. i still had a winning month though which was pretty amazing 2010 was terrible for me, went on 60bi downswing over 6week period in oct/nov ( />half of this is due to tilt/spew bad play etc) when i started taking shots at nl400. ended up underolled for nl100. br nit /> no br
    Posted by LOL_RAISE
    OK fair play here for total honesty BUT would ya let this happen again ?? bet the answer is no xxx
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    i lost 2/3rds my roll in the first week of 2010 ~$27k. i still had a winning month though which was pretty amazing 2010 was terrible for me, went on 60bi downswing over 6week period in oct/nov ( />half of this is due to tilt/spew bad play etc) when i started taking shots at nl400. ended up underolled for nl100. br nit /> no br
    Posted by LOL_RAISE
    Wow. Kudos. Reply appreciated, ty. Food for thought.

    Tough, tough game this thing they call poker.
  • edited August 2011
    Very interesting thread Bandini, gave me a good read.

    On the topic of BRM, I'd appreciate people's input on my own BRM.
    I started with £20 and have gradually worked it up to £200 by playing 2p/4p (now 50 BIs) and I'm still playing at this level, do you think this is too tight? Or should I move up to 4p/8p?
  • edited August 2011
    Id really like to know why Phil Ivey owes $8m in loans to Full Tilt. What reason would he need to borrow that?!
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    Id really like to know why Phil Ivey owes $8m in loans to Full Tilt. What reason would he need to borrow that?!
    Posted by LLCooLD
    Expensive tastes?
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc : 100x buy in's is 1% of BR 250 is 0.4% so yeah thats a BR nit ) obviously 50,000 is not his entire BR so he is a massive BR nit
    Posted by rancid
    I'm interested in some of the responses made to the OP, and will have some further questions (which some might consider somewhat naive) later. But for now the figures given above  . . . On the 2p/4p tables where I've played in the past, a buy-in is £4? So if 100 BIs (£400) represents 1% of a bankroll, does that then mean that to carry an acceptable RoR you'd need a bankroll of £40K (100 x 100 x £4)? Seems a bit over-egged?
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc : I'm interested in some of the responses made to the OP, and will have some further questions (which some might consider somewhat naive) later. But for now the figures given above  . . . On the 2p/4p tables where I've played in the past, a buy-in is £4? So if 100 BIs (£400) represents 1% of a bankroll, does that then mean that to carry an acceptable RoR you'd need a bankroll of £40K (100 x 100 x £4)? Seems a bit over-egged?
    Posted by Goethe
    100 buy ins for NL4 is £400 - so a BR of £400
    so this would mean you only have 1% of your BR in play on one table

    NL4 a BR of £80 is adequate to start - 20 buy ins
    5% of your BR in play on one table



  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    Very interesting thread Bandini, gave me a good read. On the topic of BRM, I'd appreciate people's input on my own BRM. I started with £20 and have gradually worked it up to £200 by playing 2p/4p (now 50 BIs) and I'm still playing at this level, do you think this is too tight? Or should I move up to 4p/8p?
    Posted by Lambert180
    Good work mate.

    With £200 you HAVE to start playing NL10 now or at least try NL8 for a few 100 hands, maybe give it 1000 hands there but you gotta move up to NL10 soon with 20 BI's at that level, continuing at NL4 is just wasting your time lol.

    Also if you do move up stay away from my tables !
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    Very interesting thread Bandini, gave me a good read. On the topic of BRM, I'd appreciate people's input on my own BRM. I started with £20 and have gradually worked it up to £200 by playing 2p/4p (now 50 BIs) and I'm still playing at this level, do you think this is too tight? Or should I move up to 4p/8p?
    Posted by Lambert180
    You are comfortably rolled for nl8 now i would give it ago and if you drop down to 160 you can always play nl4 again. Do you multitable? if so maybe 2 nl4 tables and 2 nl8 to help you with the transition but you get the same calibre of player in nl8 as nl4 so i imagine you will do fine :)
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc : 100 buy ins for NL4 is £400 - so a BR of £400 so this would mean you only have 1% of your BR in play on one table NL4 a BR of £80 is adequate to start - 20 buy ins 5% of your BR in play on one table
    Posted by rancid
    In poker, due to the dynamics and vaguaries of the game, it's hard (if not impossible) to calculate a risk of ruin figure. I can see from this example how to calculate a %age of a bankroll on any one table, which isn't the same thing. Is %age of bankroll on the table at any one time the defacto basis for calculating what bankroll is required at any given level to give an acceptable RoR? And what is an acceptable RoR considered to be in hold'em?

    I've done a lot of these sums for Blackjack, but that's a very different game and frankly one that's a lot easier to analyse. In online poker you can down-level almost to the penny tables to maintain a desired RoR (%age) where in BJ you can't - at some stage bet units will hit the table minimums.
  • edited August 2011
    I never multitable cash games at diff levels , like 2xnl4 and 2xnl8 i always play at the same level as i think its difficult to equate buy ins won/lost and i would hate to run really well on the lower level and lose on the higher one xx
  • edited August 2011
    Cheers Dude and Jams.

    I am multi-tabling but I'm relatively new to it so doing about 3 tables at the moment just til I get comfortable and can increase that a bit. Plus I hate mini-view so having to try and get used to that.

    Yeah I just didn't know if because I'm playing 3 tables, if I play 8NL then that means I've got £24 on the table as soon as I sit down which seems like a big chunk of my £200 BR.

    I guess we're working on the basis that alot of the people at this level are junk so in terms of ups and downs, your downs should be less??

  • edited August 2011
    Interesting read.

    My own experience, (brag btw) i spun $8 into $160 at NL4 plus a few MTT's, then moved up to NL8 and spun up to $196, obviously sticking to the 20 x BI rule. I then had a horrific run and suffered some really bad variance and dropped below $160. I knew this had affected my confidence for the first time and dropped back to playing small STT's to try and turn it around.

    After a small break, (lakes for a week), i returned to NL4 and have taken an age to grind back up to $170-$180. I'm getting there. Only small scale stuff this but this seemed to stop the slide and stopped me tilting and losing everything and going busto. Do not move up a level to chase your losses, if anything drop down a level or two until you feel you are playing well again.

    Good luck.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    Cheers Dude and Jams. I am multi-tabling but I'm relatively new to it so doing about 3 tables at the moment just til I get comfortable and can increase that a bit. Plus I hate mini-view so having to try and get used to that. Yeah I just didn't know if because I'm playing 3 tables, if I play 8NL then that means I've got £24 on the table as soon as I sit down which seems like a big chunk of my £200 BR. I guess we're working on the basis that alot of the people at this level are junk so in terms of ups and downs, your downs should be less??
    Posted by Lambert180
    This is so crazy because that's exactly how I felt when I started multitabling back when I was playing 4NL, I actually didn't multitable till I had £80 (20 BI's) this now seems obsurd as single tabling would probably make my brain melt lol

    On the having £24 on the tables yes in theory this is what you do have but after playing multitable cash for a while now you soon realise that the only reason you do it is so you simply see more hands. If you're playing good solid poker (which is the ONLY way up to 10NL, maybe higher lol) then you'll just continue doing what you did on one table but it means you don't have to wait 10 years for the some guy to min bet 3 streets and the other to slow roll call down with 3rd pair, you always have action happening and this in turn stops you from playing too loose/getting bored.

    Another thing with multitabling is when you get good days they can be REALLY good but of course you get the odd bad day that can be REALLY bad lol just about getting more good ones.
  • edited August 2011
    In Response to Re: Do pros ever go bust? FAO LOLRAISE, lolu, gliterbabe, ljamesl, brownndog, etc:
    if I play 8NL then that means I've got £24 on the table as soon as I sit down which seems like a big chunk of my £200 BR.
    Posted by Lambert180
    Playing online merely means you can play more than one "live" session.
    So if you playing four tables then your really playing four live sessions in one session.

    Only move up when you feel comfortable playing 8NL or 10NL
    If you feel your not playing the same then you should not be playing.
    If your playing 20 buy ins you need to feel confident you can beat the level your playing.
    Half your BR gone and you realise the step up was not a good idea, i know how this feels )
    I would advocate waiting for 25 buy ins, give yourself a 5 buy in window to handle the variance to start with.



Sign In or Register to comment.