Seat 1: timo***1 (5,730 in chips)
Seat 2: poor***2 (140 in chips)
Seat 3: avfcalex (3,000 in chips)
Seat 4: Riss***4 (5,040 in chips)
Seat 5: Duke***5 (2,215 in chips) DEALER
Seat 6: rjmu***6 (2,950 in chips)
Seat 7: Isol***7 (2,796 in chips)
Seat 8: bboy***8 (6,066 in chips)
Seat 9: RedH***9 (2,430 in chips)
rjmu***6: posts small blind 15
Isol***7: posts big blind 30
Dealt to avfcalex [Kh,Ks]
bboy***8: folds
RedH***9: calls 30
timo***1: folds
poor***2: raises to 60
avfcalex: raises to 255
Riss***4: folds
Duke***5: calls 255
rjmu***6: folds
Isol***7: folds
RedH***9: is all in 2,400
poor***2: is all in 80
avfcalex: is all in 2,745
Duke***5: folds
avfcalex: returns uncalled bet 570
poor***2: shows [Ts As]
avfcalex: shows [Kh Ks]
RedH***9: shows [Qd Qs]
*** FLOP *** [5c,6d,7h]
*** TURN *** [Jd]
*** RIVER *** [Qh]
***SHOW DOWN***
RedH***9 wins 4,695 with Three of a Kind Queens
***SHOW DOWN***
RedH***9 wins 605 with Three of a Kind Queens
Comments
Well Spotted Dohhhh
Using a hand to attack a site, yet its not a hand from that site. Just bad form.
Go and cheat somewhere else.
With the exception of Phil Laak and Jennifer Tilly the only real love in poker is the love of winning and the money that brings.
It is a brutal, spiritual void more likely to generate bitterness, jealousy, hatred, frustration and for the vast majority, loss.
If it's love you are after try Mills and Boon, Hollywood, the church, the poetry of Keats or Shelley for example or bending down to pick up something a 'lady' has dropped, at the same time she does, bumping heads in the process.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news ........... I wish it were different. I wish poker was a magical realm where the lion and the lamb play happily together forever. The reality is that poker is a filthy, savage abattoir of hope and joy. Like warfare, crime, and substance addiction just another annex of Hell.
Gl and have fun at the tables
That was really funny. What did he say ? " IT WILL MAKE YOU ILL !!!!! " or something.
He appeared to be to be losing it getting stressed about other people getting stressed, and all for the reasons you mention.
A card table is a vicious circle to be sure
Its nothing personal against avfcalexs, like many I just didnt appreciate the OP in this thread, as its an utter misrepresentation and falsehood.
But then to just put up another flat out manipulative lie that I have messaged him an apology is hugely bad form I'd hope that the forum realise I have more integrity than that. I really dont like what he's attempted to do here.
Black mass: I agree with you post fully in regard to poker in general. But what he is doing isnt that. I think pod1 hit the real issue smack on the head.
Black Mass is a whoa man? (woman).
I have to admit that i am a whoa man and not a woman.
I hope that clears up any confusion.
p.s. my theory is paying nicely at the mo so why would i change it,and i would be carefull who you call krazy as you may just be the one who ends up looking silly in the end so if i were you until the regulations are produced i would come down off your high horse.
i would say a fair percentage of online poker players do not think online poker is 100% legit so for arguments sake lets say 20% have there doubts that's possibly hundreads of millions lost revenue for online poker if these people stay away which could be easily resolved by the industry by putting out clear and strict regulations that they have to adhere to ie rng regulations from the numbers(cards) generated to how they find them dealt and reordered for the flop turn and river etc you would think any business would hate to miss out on this money so why do they not put out these regulations simple really.
First: 17/6/2009
Last: 12/9/2011In Response to Re: What's wrong with this site?:
i agree with most of what you say pod 1, but i think you may be missing my point. the question i would like answered is is the game truly random as this is what sites are implying. if it is random then each hand is dealt from a pack of 52 without any idea what the next card will be, this is regulated in the live game. and transparent for all to see, but is it the same for online poker. if sky put it in the forum that it is then i will accept that as a fact. i have never said that online poker is rigged. i am happy with my results on sky. i don't win a lot i dont lose a lot. i just enjoy playing poker. i take my bad beats have a moan and carry on.i am just asking that the regulations be transparent for everyone to understand. allowing them to decide weather they want to spend their money in full knowledge of all the facts
Posted by drumahai05
I've tried/am trying to avoid commenting on threads started by "area51 regs" recently, although it is hard at times.
All/most of my A51 posts now will be on threads started by, (and posts contributed by) new players entering A51.
But fwiw the above post is one of the most reasonable posts I've read from an A51er, and I see no reason why his requests cannot be met by sky.
I'm certain they can provide evidence to put your mind at rest about the validity of the RNG, and I can't see why they haven't done it already.
So, over to sky I guess, and we can all play happily ever after ........................
oh and by the way god is a bannana and britney spears is a man now theres crazy post 1 more to come
from dohhhhhhh's post correct me if im wrong but does this not name me as a crazy which to be honest i lol at but a clear swipe at me for my newbie run good theory.
for someone who has never played live poker he does have a lot of blind faith in online poker but has nothing to compare it too if he has never played live(which i believe to be correct i may be wrong though)