fwiw its worth i think the decision in this instance may have been a good one, BUT i dont much like to preflop/ post-flop bet-sizing
also i wouldnt have taken this line...i would lead out-call, check raise shove turn as villain could 3bet any Pair, flush draw, or even be 3bettin light, but when he 5bet shoves i think his range is polarised to Ax or 55
fwiw its worth i think the decision in this instance may have been a good one, BUT i dont much like to preflop/ post-flop bet-sizing also i wouldnt have taken this line...i would lead out-call, check raise shove turn as villain could 3bet any Pair, flush draw, or even be 3bettin light, but when he 5bet shoves i think his range is polarised to Ax or 55 Posted by sikas
the point is the whole thought process of 3betting then deciding what to do when we get 4bet is just wrong, the only reason he should be 3betting here is to get stacks in and so he should be snap calling a shove.
"the point is the whole thought process of 3betting then deciding what to do when we get 4bet is just wrong, the only reason he should be 3betting here is to get stacks in and so he should be snap calling a shove."
quote from grantorino
"yeah he is often behind when villain 4bets. But readless you cant 3b/f this strong a hand, its bluffing with a strong hand and better never folds"
Two very good points.
Can you talk us through your thought process on the flop please. Not a dig at op just might be easier to explain why this happened and what your thoughts were at the time.
Comments