All Categories› Poker› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

UKOPS - the Leaderboard.

2»

Comments

  • hurst05hurst05
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    =(((((B2-A2)/A2)*1000)*(C2/100))^0.33)*10+(B2/C2) Where B Winnings, A Buyin and C players. Gives a good spread of values, and rewards ROI, while taking into account buyin size and player field as well as winnings. I think it gives some pretty good results
    Posted by CoxyLboro
    lol my mind just asploded
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unknown_usernameunknown_username
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : Deffo worth a gander, Mr AA. By the way, congrats on being the FIRST player to qualify for the £530 UKOPS High Roller! Now get the job finished, eh?
    Posted by Tikay10
    TY Tikay. Should be fun and hope I can spin it up.
    Yeah I think they use some multiplier function depending on feild size and buy-in. 

    Maybe your formula wasn't a million miles away....

    P.S. Don's suggestion seems reasonable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rentisduerentisdue
    edited October 2011
    Why not do it on a number of runners in each event type of score board by quatering the field each time.

    Eg 400 runners = top 100 get 100 points, 101 to 200 get 75 points, 201 to 300 get 50 points and 301 to 400 get 25 points.

    Then give extra points to the payouts.

    Eg if 30 paid 1st gets 30 points and 30th gets 1 point.

    Bit simple i know but easy enough to understand and score.

    I know it will give anyone playing more events more chance of winning but imo anyone willing to join more events should have.

    Only a idea though so dont shoot me down :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HITMAN_RVHITMAN_RV
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    square root of the prize money in each event added together would work
    Posted by aussie09
    Brilliant Rob, but will anyone else understand!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoLackSoLack
    edited October 2011
    What Ryan said - league points
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tikay10Tikay10
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : Brilliant Rob, but will anyone else understand!!
    Posted by HITMAN_RV
    With due respect, if an Aussie can understand it........
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BrownnDogBrownnDog
    edited October 2011
    Who ever knocks Tikay out in the most brutal fashion gets the most points and wins = simple!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dylan12dylan12
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    Who ever knocks Tikay out in the most brutal fashion gets the most points and wins = simple!
    Posted by BrownnDog
    I would second this, fairest and funniest = win + win imo :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unknown_usernameunknown_username
    edited October 2011

    IMO size of field has to be the most important factor
    The standard of player taking part will be elite in all competitions
    therefore structured points for finishing positions should be the same in all competitions
    with 1 bonus point added for every 50 players taking part.
    When Dylan 12 won the jackpot he triumphed over 500 in each comp his score would be 30 points for winning plus bonus 10 pts for the field
    whereas winning the roller would be 30 points for the win and just 1 point for the field because less players take part and fewer decisions have to be made.
    Cash prize money should be irrelevant skillfull play should be the only thing rewarded

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kidwizzz78kidwizzz78
    edited October 2011
    The easiest factor possible would be dont go buy the buy in to the tournies forget that it should be as said...

    6 WCOPS tournies , with these points bein with in close region it would apply a close league at the same time and make it more intresting.
     
    1st ... 100
    2nd .. 90
    3rd ... 80
    4th ... 70
    5th ... 60
    6th ... 50
    7th ... 40
    8th ... 30
    9th ... 20
    10th .. 10

    hope that helps
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MachkaMachka
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    alphabetical?
    Posted by aussie09
    I like this idea.

    Aaron.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • aussie09aussie09
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : I like this idea. Aa ron.
    Posted by Machka
    me too, Ron

    aaRob

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • aussie09aussie09
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : With due respect, if an Aussie can understand it........
    Posted by Tikay10
    precisely.









    wait a minute.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pomfrittespomfrittes
    edited October 2011


       Points should be awarded to all players taking part and 1st out gets 1 pt, 2nd 2 pts etc etc. So in a 100 runner tourney winner gets 100 pts, 200 runners winner obv gets 200 pts. Players who go deep in big fields are therefore rewarded relative to field size. This is simplistic i know but eliminates the need to worry about buy ins and prize funds etc.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MachkaMachka
    edited October 2011
    To level the field completely eliminating any weighing of buy in, field size etc just base the league on % of field beaten.

    I couldn't get the spreadsheet to work perfectly so winning doesn't always get 100 points (percent passed) but a rough working copy would give this.
    Runners Finish Position % Beaten By (% You Beat)
    Points Awarded
    51 51 100 0
    51 40 78 22
    51 30 59 41
    51 25 49 51
    51 10 20 80
    51 5 10 90
    51 2 4 96
    51 1 2 98

    Runners Finish Position % Beaten By (% You Beat)
    Points Awarded
    500 500 100 0
    500 400 80 20
    500 300 60 40
    500 250 50 50
    500 100 20 80
    500 51 10 90
    500 30 6 94
    500 25 5 95
    500 5 1 99
    500 2 0 100
    500 1 0 100
    Simply put this is:

    Points Awarded = 100 - ((Finish Position / Total Runners) / 100)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • aussie09aussie09
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    To level the field completely eliminating any weighing of buy in, field size etc just base the league on % of field beaten. I couldn't get the spreadsheet to work perfectly so winning doesn't always get 100 points (percent passed) but a rough working copy would give this. Runners Finish Position % Beaten By (% You Beat) Points Awarded 51 51 100 0 51 40 78 22 51 30 59 41 51 25 49 51 51 10 20 80 51 5 10 90 51 2 4 96 51 1 2 98 Runners Finish Position % Beaten By (% You Beat) Points Awarded 500 500 100 0 500 400 80 20 500 300 60 40 500 250 50 50 500 100 20 80 500 51 10 90 500 30 6 94 500 25 5 95 500 5 1 99 500 2 0 100 500 1 0 100 Simply put this is: Points Awarded = 100 - ((Finish Position / Total Runners) / 100)
    Posted by Machka

    brilliant aaron, you are so funny.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MachkaMachka
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard. : brilliant aaron, you are so funny.
    Posted by aussie09
    Got to work hard to keep the comedy level up.  All that competition from new posters on the show threads these days.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • aussie09aussie09
    edited October 2011


    aye, that wobbly guy... trying to be witty... he has to post at least 1,501 posts before he get's a "lol" here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MachkaMachka
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    aye, that wobbly guy... trying to be witty... he has to post at least 1,501 posts before he get's a "lol" here.
    Posted by aussie09
    lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MachkaMachka
    edited October 2011
    Was there a decision on whether to run a leaderboard for UKOPS?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoLackSoLack
    edited November 2011
    Possibly
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • aussie09aussie09
    edited November 2011


    the formula contained a circular reference

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tikay10Tikay10
    edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: UKOPS - the Leaderboard.:
    Was there a decision on whether to run a leaderboard for UKOPS?
    Posted by Machka
    Yes - & the UKOPS Leaderboard after UKOPS1 wil be Posted on the Community later today, as well as the prizes.

    PS -Aaron - I need you to try & help me with a little techie problem next door, if you don't mind. Can you contact me, please?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sky_DaveSky_Dave
    edited November 2011
    It's been published - see the sticky at the top of the General Poker Chat :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.