You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Nothing else to say really as this hand is about right in whats been happening to me on this site for at least 2 weeks now , i know variance can be harsh but WHY do players call any raise with hands like this ??
Yes i DO want these calls BUT NOT when tney keep hitten em ffs
Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
callumtres | Small blind | 1500.00 | 1500.00 | 141936.94 | |
GEORGE21 | Big blind | 3000.00 | 4500.00 | 105477.39 | |
Your hole cards |
| ||||
debdobs_67 | Raise | 6000.00 | 10500.00 | 63820.57 | |
Th35hark84 | Fold | ||||
callumtres | Call | 4500.00 | 15000.00 | 137436.94 | |
GEORGE21 | Call | 3000.00 | 18000.00 | 102477.39 | |
Flop | |||||
| |||||
callumtres | Check | ||||
GEORGE21 | Check | ||||
debdobs_67 | Bet | 18000.00 | 36000.00 | 45820.57 | |
callumtres | Fold | ||||
GEORGE21 | All-in | 102477.39 | 138477.39 | 0.00 | |
debdobs_67 | All-in | 45820.57 | 184297.96 | 0.00 | |
GEORGE21 | Unmatched bet | 38656.82 | 145641.14 | 38656.82 | |
GEORGE21 | Show |
| |||
debdobs_67 | Show |
| |||
Turn | |||||
| |||||
River | |||||
| |||||
GEORGE21 | Win | Two Pairs, Queens and 4s | 145641.14 | 184297.96 |
Comments
I don't comment on others' playing decisions, as I'm not a great player myself, but I think a questionable call to a shove on your part, especially if you consider the risk/return bit - you're risking all your chips on what you thought was top pair with two to come, but your oppos not going to go out if his two pairs are beaten with the appearance of two (or one in this case - ace) naff card(s).
Don't give up, but learn from the experience.
Good cards.
Questionable call by george pre flop, maybe if u raise more pre he wud fold. but after that there's no way u can fold to shove with tptk. if he has a set then its just ul..if he on a draw then ur still ahead.
so calling 1bb to get lucky isnt so bad imo....
better to type ur frustations than to shout at ppl
NUFF SED
In hinddight, I think he was querying what I'd written . . . I thought I'd put in "thought you had best hand with top pair", although what I did write was "thought you had top pair" (which of course you actually did at that point).
Despite my earlier posting I did the same myself the other night - was short stacked and dealt pocket Jacks. Let the flop go down - 2,3,4. As the caller had called a hefty raise I thought he might have an ace, therefore he would be chasing a 5 high straight (odds of about 5-1 if I went all in). I did, and he flipped over A,5o. So it was goodnight from me. . . Should have shoved pre-flop, although at the level I play a lot of players will call with an ace and anything.
For note, The odds of flopping a 5 high straight are 304.81-1, so I think I can be forgiven for discounting that possibility.
Eg the chance of flopping a flush with any 2 suited cards is 118.8-1, however once you have seen that the board has 3 of the same suit, the chance the oppo has flopped the flush is actually about 1 in 24.
Also, although mathematically the same, the chance of running into an ace high straight, compared to a five high straight are higher - simply because players are more likely to hold onto two cards that would make an ace high straight than a five high straight. How many players will call through on 2,4o (possibly with the exception of the blinds)? This is where the maths get blurred in the game and why the variance aspects of it are really unquantifiable - due to individual's playing style will have an effect on results.
A reason why, although the odds and maths are not the be all and end all of the game, a little time invested in memorising some numbers can go a long way. Over a period of time, people will develop a gut feeling for the likelihood of an event happening (ie being rivered by a card that turns an underpair into a set), but if it isn't quantified then it can be easy to call "rigged game".
By example, I play DYMs and on an average of forty hands a game (of which I play around 15), then for every 6 or 7 games I play I expect to be on the end of a one in a hundred odds event occuring. Not particularly scientific, but it does put things in perspective. Those who play thousands of hands, and then scream "rigged" when their aces are cracked by someone calling with pocket threes (as an example) need to put some study time in - with the maths.
Good cards.
Eg, If you hold A5, the chance of the flop being 2 3 4 is 1 in 306.25
If the board is 2 3 4, the chance of him having A5 is 1 in 73.5
So once you know the flop the odds decrease.
Very confused . . . the chances of anyone holding any two cards are 220-1. There are 1,326 possible hole card combinations, and with six ways to make a hand that equates to 6/1,326, or 1/221? This doesn't change after an event has occured. So in the case above with 2,3,4, on the board, I know that the chances of him holding A,5 are still 220-1. The coincidence of this, together with flopping the three cards needed to make the straight tally to the 305-1(ish).
Think we must have studied maths at different schools.
1 There are 6 combos of each paired hand, but 16 of unpaired hands like A5. So pre the odds of you being dealt A5 are 4C1*4C1/52C2. Once you see you have JJ the odds he has A5 are 16/50C2
2The odds change a little postflop. You know 5 cards already (2,3,4,J,J) He can have A5 (4C1*4C1)/(47C2)
Also there are a good few more hands he can have that beat you or have good equity against your range. Use reads, betting etc along with the maths
In the case described, I was reasonably sure of the ace, and knowing the odds of the oppo being dealt A-5, and therefore hitting a five high straight on the flop, I thought I'd be in clover. Fate dictated otherwise. :-(
Apologies for confusing anyone reading this. Got my come-uppance though - have just got bombed out of three on the trot.