You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
joburns06 | Small blind | £0.25 | £0.25 | £5.52 | |
richtea | Big blind | £0.50 | £0.75 | £49.50 | |
Your hole cards |
| ||||
SJspanky1 | Raise | £1.50 | £2.25 | £63.47 | |
britrock | Call | £1.50 | £3.75 | £64.53 | |
iwojima03 | Call | £1.50 | £5.25 | £114.71 | |
Jibbz | Fold | ||||
joburns06 | Fold | ||||
richtea | Fold | ||||
Flop | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
SJspanky1 | Bet | £3.00 | £8.25 | £60.47 | |
britrock | Raise | £11.44 | £19.69 | £53.09 | |
iwojima03 | Fold | ||||
SJspanky1 | All-in | £60.47 | £80.16 | £0.00 | |
britrock | Call | £52.03 | £132.19 | £1.06 | |
SJspanky1 | Show |
| |||
britrock | Show |
| |||
Turn | |||||
| |||||
River | |||||
| |||||
britrock | Win | Three 5s | £130.39 | £131.45 |
Comments
Banana skins____________>
How does it run –EV
Maybe I am missing something in my head calculations, thought it was very slightly +EV even with no FE – does oppo never raise leads with air/hands that fold – can you give me 2% FE at least )
Edit: -EV all day
you have zero fold equity and zero chance that this villain has anything other than a set. his hand is completely face up. he never has A5 or A4 and will never reraise a flush draw of any kind
what does poker stove say when you know his hand is either 55 or 66?
you win some and you lose some, but like the aggression
You have theoretically fifteen outs, but even if you hit on the turn the villain has ten outs for the redraw (he has 7 outs that kill you instantly). If you had 5 clean outs would you get it all in? I doubt it.
The sums aren't exact but close enough for the discussion.
Do we want him to call? I would say yes. Thinks he b/fs a potion of hands we'd rather keep in here. Wanting him to call, I raise a committing amount that forces him to shove.
I want his whole stack here tbh and I dont want to give him a reason to sigh fold.
But once deciding that, we cannot care about the result. We want to make a bet that gets called or re shipped on. Doubtful he flats when we do this. If he does, we have already decided to ship any turn obv.
I'd never call, but i dont shove simply as I dont want to lose customer, unless I'm reasonably sure he calls. What more do we wany from the flop?
Then I'll get a biscuit while the board runs. If rolled result is immaterial. Seems to me we are 6/4 fav territory here despite opponent being at very top of his range as seen.
This hand is simple imo if rolled.
Do we not want to get as much money in with highest point of equity?
Do we really want to c/f turn? In honesty, will we be? Doubtful.
We raise UTG for with suited connectors looking to flop practically this board. Make a decision, step on the gas and let the board run. To do anything else in this hand, in cash, when rolled would be silly,
In my more risk averse days I'd prob agree with you. But we need to be realistic on what options we give ourselves on later streets in this hand.
We have flopped the world draw with 120bb's. Even against the rarity where opponent is at the top of his range this is a no brainer..
Yes Doh we are semi bluffing, but I dont agree we definately want a fold. Once we have made our decision on flop that we are in for the whole journey and we are comfortable playing for our stack outcome regardless, I prefer a raise that ensures stacks go in, rather than allows a fold.
As CrazyBen states it was pretty obvious that the villain had a set here. I just couldn't live with myself if I call with suited connectors, hit just about the ultimate drawing flop and then don't commit to the hand. Result was immaterial IMO but I wanted to know the general concensus.
It seems mathematically that I make the wrong play here but Peg liked it and he's my hero so I'll live with it.
Might not click that all-in quite so quick next time mind.....
Funny thing is you have semi bluffed once by leading flop
Then we semi bluff again, only a bluff raise we fold out
Maybe c/r flop is better
Why are we assuming opponent ALWAYS has set?, would be silly.
C) We are not a 40% dog. 8 hearts 6 straightners 14 outs 2.2 x 14 x 2 = 61% Even shaving 2 outs off gives us a slight edge @ 51%.
We need to look at the hand realistically. We raise UTG, flop the world and then look to lose the Minimum? Are we really going to be giving up if we miss turn.......Sigh...
In Response to Re: Is shove correct or can I call?:
Look at crazyben/huuume's posts, 2 players both say this guy only has a set here.. huuuume says this guy never raises a FD/1 pair or 2 pair.50% you say?
---
5,940 games 0.080 secs 74,250 games/sec
Board: 5h Ah 4c
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 40.202% 40.20% 00.00% 2388 0.00 { 7h6h }
Hand 1: 59.798% 59.80% 00.00% 3552 0.00 { 55-44 }
---
Depends on your read on oppo, could be raising a range of hands but without reads you have to say top of range – set = -EV
If oppo is only raising here with top of range then it’s vey easy for us to play this hand versus this oppo
---
44,550 games 0.001 secs 44,550,000 games/sec
Board: 5c 4h Ah
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.928% 49.93% 00.00% 22243 0.00 { 7h6h }
Hand 1: 50.072% 50.07% 00.00% 22307 0.00 { 55-44, AKs, A5s-A4s, 54s, AKo, A5o-A4o, 54o }
---
Someone do the stove bit :S
edit: colley done it ) Think range is too wide - only AK seems resonable to raise here
Seems the decision here really boils down to our basest tendencies, the more nit like take the less aggressive line, the aggro guys would go shove with it...No denying that its a -EV move though...PokerStove never tells fibs.
Be nice if I could post a hand where I actually win and get a similar response
Pretty sure that the 50nl regs would be saying something similar to what they did 'this guy always has a set here'
we prob dont have fe in this spot