You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Sky Poker forums will be temporarily unavailable from 11pm Wednesday July 25th.
Sky Poker Forums is upgrading its look! Stay tuned for the big reveal!

live ruling- thoughts please

2»

Comments

  • edited March 2012

    If you're sat in seat 1 or seat 10, keep your elbows into the dealer so he can't just reach past you.
    I've had one try to take my cards out from under my hand before. He was very apologetic when I asked him what he thought he was doing... lol

  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    If you're sat in seat 1 or seat 10, keep your elbows into the dealer so he can't just reach past you. I've had one try to take my cards out from under my hand before. He was very apologetic when I asked him what he thought he was doing... lol
    Posted by BorinLoner
    "LIKE".

    Seat 1 & 10 (or the seat immediately either side of the Dealer) are the hot spots.

    Good advice. Mr Loner.

    You got no friends, then? You & me would get along fine, methinks.

    Some years ago, the great Ali Mallu was in Seat 1, in Grosvenor Bolton, & the Dealer mucked his hand by mistake. Some aggro verbals go off, followed by some argy bargy handbag slapping type stuff, 6 of one, half dozen of the other sorta thing.

    Ali goes home, & 2 days later, gets a letter, saying he is Banned from Grosvenor Casinos, ALLEGEDLY for "assaulting the dealer". (He said he just tickled him.....)

    Now, sort this Ruling out. By now - 2 days later - Ali has made the Final of another Tourney in Blackpool, and I was in the same Final. It was a 2 day jobbie, we return on Day Two, 9 of us, to play the Final. And they won't let Ali Mallu in, they say he has been banned nationwide. (His ban was overturned a year later, & all is well with he & Grosvenor now).

    Ali rings me at the Table from Reception & asks me to go see him, but I can't get involved in that sort of discussion, so Ali can't get in to finish the Tourney he paid £300 or whatever to enter the previoios day. 

    So, his chips are "in play", but he can't play.
     
    The question, then, is what happens to his chipstack? Obviously, leaving them in play, advantages some, & disadantages others. Think about THAT one!

    PS - I just looked it up on a Database, it was Saturday 30th December, 2006.  9th place is shown as "Name withheld". That was Ali. You can guess what donkey finished eighth, of course......  
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    Try this one. You are playing Live Poker, & it is you to act.   The guy to act AFTER you - to your left, accidentally mucks his hand "out of turn". The guy behind HIM now, caused by the "domino effect", also mucks his
    hand, too. Guess who gets penalised? Correct - YOU do  - your hand is declared dead.   
    Posted by Tikay10

    Bizarre!

    Where are these rules written down? Are they on any major casino group website? Or are players just supposed to know them?
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : That changes it COMPLETELY. The Floor are summoned, & the player is required to name his EXACT TWO cards at first time of asking. (No second chances). If he does so, his cards can be recovered from the muck, & play of the hand continues, always providing no further action behind has taken place. In this case, the player has acted correctly, so he does not get penalised.   If the player does not act correctly, he/she DOES get penalised.  
    Posted by Tikay10

    So if this was pre-flop, and the player hadn't looked at his cards yet (as is quite rightly drummed into us on 865 regularly), despite the player doing absolutely nothing wrong he/she is effectively punished?


    EDIT - Sorry - just realised I slightly misread the original post that the player concerned had raised, so he must have looked at his cards!
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : So if this was pre-flop, and the player hadn't looked at his cards yet (as is quite rightly drummed into us on 865 regularly), despite the player doing absolutely nothing wrong he/she is effectively punished? EDIT - Sorry - just realised I slightly misread the original post that the player concerned had raised, so he must have looked at his cards!
    Posted by FCHD
    It IS pre-flop.

    In the example quoted, "we" have NOT acted yet. We are still deciding what to do, when the two guys behind us mucked out of turn. So our hand is ruled "dead"......

    Not sure how it would apply post-flop. The same, I guess.....
     
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : So if this was pre-flop, and the player hadn't looked at his cards yet (as is quite rightly drummed into us on 865 regularly), despite the player doing absolutely nothing wrong he/she is effectively punished? EDIT - Sorry - just realised I slightly misread the original post that the player concerned had raised, so he must have looked at his cards!
    Posted by FCHD
    You got it.

    Weird, eh?

    The logic is that "we" had time to point out that the player behind us acted out of turn BEFORE the 2nd player did the same thing. Which is tosh, of course.

    It is a standard rule in all Grosvenor Casinos, but fortunately or otherwise, it is NOT applied consistently, like most of their rules, I'm afraid.

    I do have a little smile to myself when folks have a pop at Online Poker. Try playing "Live", & see what happens!
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : So if this was pre-flop, and the player hadn't looked at his cards yet (as is quite rightly drummed into us on 865 regularly), despite the player doing absolutely nothing wrong he/she is effectively punished? EDIT - Sorry - just realised I slightly misread the original post that the player concerned had raised, so he must have looked at his cards!
    Posted by FCHD
    I probably havent if im raising early posision.
  • edited March 2012
    Thanks for the feedback everyone and im glad this thread has developed a healthy debate

    Since i have begun live poker I always been told to protect my cards, and i do, without fail, usually with a chip. I never realised just how important this was i just did it as habit without really understanding why...

    Having listened, I fully agree with tikay that it is the players responsibility to protect their cards. On this occasion, the player was clearly unhappy with the decision, but he used that annoyance positively and went on to win the mtt, showing great character. He told me after that he has never ever used a card protector and he has played the game for many years...

    I wonder if he now will...

    The dealer was also a little annoyed with herself and said sorry to the player after the mtt which i thought was nice. But, mistakes happen and she had been dealing non stop for 2 days it was about 3am, so anyone saying "sack the dealer" is being rediculous imo.  Tikay is right tho, the main mistake was the player not protecting his cards and so this was a fair ruling.
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : Absolutely, Jon. But it remains the players responsibility to protect their hands. It is best that players understand that totally, & don't rely on there being a sensible TD, in a good mood.   The rule is absolutely clear, & sacrosant.   
    Posted by Tikay10
    Absolutely, first and foremost you have to protect your hand.

    But the 'rules are rules; cast in iron and stone never to be bent or flexible in any way' mindset can get annoying - most commonly when it comes from local regs jumping on a string bet from an inexperienced player - and that highlights that you mainly get it from players rather than tournament officials. 

    I think most licensed card rooms do have good staff who run poker games well and do make sensible decisions - but if they ever make a decision which is the common sense and fair ruling despite not being a strict interpretation of the rules, that usually seems to lead to at least half the table grumbling that it's the worse decision ever made and obviously 'wrong'. That doesn't effect the game - but it can get irritating when they're still dissecting it 2 hours later :D


    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    ... He told me after that he has never ever used a card protector and he has played the game for many years... I wonder if he now will...
    Posted by GREGHOGG

    Funnily enough Sam Razavi said something in passing that I'd never thought about before - he said that he'd seen a lot of regular players not using card protectors and wondered if they thought it was some sign of weakness or naivety to have to use one. I don't know the reason but given how important it is to protect your hand it is a bit odd how many experienced players don't bother with something so simple.
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    But, mistakes happen and she had been dealing non stop for 2 days it was about 3am, so anyone saying "sack the dealer" is being rediculous imo
    Posted by GREGHOGG
    Attention slip ups just shouldn't happen IMO, imagine if pod made a fundamental error due to lack of attention after a long day at work, 3 weeks later the bridge collapses killing 700 million people, that would be his fault and I bloody hope he'd get fired if that ever happened!!

    If a dealer makes mistakes often(ish) they should be gone!
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : Attention slip ups just shouldn't happen IMO, imagine if pod made a fundamental error due to lack of attention after a long day at work, 3 weeks later the bridge collapses killing 700 million people, that would be his fault and I bloody hope he'd get fired if that ever happened!! If a dealer makes mistakes often(ish) they should be gone!
    Posted by Poker_Fail

    If you can fit 700 million people on a bridge without it collapsing, I would be surprised lol

    Well, let's put it this way, i wouldnt want you to be my manager or i'd be without a job!
  • edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please:
    In Response to Re: live ruling- thoughts please : If you can fit 700 million people on a bridge without it collapsing, I would be surprised lol Well, let's put it this way, i wouldnt want you to be my manager or i'd be without a job!
    Posted by GREGHOGG

    Depends what you do, things like poker and bridges need attention to detail!

    If you're something useless like an astronaut, or doctor, you might as well turn up drunk.
  • edited March 2012
    It's a lot easier just to use one of them things on the ends of your arms and protect your cards, but is this allowed - I have never had a problem but people do say "I can't see your cards"
    Like they can't keep track of who is in the hand!
  • edited March 2012
    You can't hide your cards (a path to angle shooting if ever there was one) - but if I'm in seat 1 or 10 or if I'm worried about a dealer then I'll use a card protector AND put a hand over the bottom of my cards.
Sign In or Register to comment.