i think check call coz of bluff catching the opponent could esily have busted flush draw here so check and let him bluff of stack i dnt really like the all in because i think its marginal maybe some kings will call u but i think alot of times maybe same hand or hands that beat u will call i dnt like bet fold here imo c/c is best
In Response to Re: 400nl HU: River decision in 3b pot : Why do you have to call? Posted by LadyFingrs
I think he means because any bet of £100 or so that gets reraised leaves a lot of money out there and fairly big pot odds that would mean vs the range of hands he may have over the long haul calling would likely be the right thing to do even if you lose in this one spot.
In Response to Re: 400nl HU: River decision in 3b pot : I think he means because any bet of £100 or so that gets reraised leaves a lot of money out there and fairly big pot odds that would mean vs the range of hands he may have over the long haul calling would likely be the right thing to do even if you lose in this one spot. Posted by KAM99
I understand this concept haha
What I mean is, if we think he's call everything worse with a bet of 150, but never shove worse and always shove better then why do we have to call.
I haven't done the maths but i guess our pot odds would be like 7:1. So we have to be good 12.5% of the time. If we're not then why do we have to call?
Comments
But that's prob why I'm awful at cash